Refocusing where and how IT value is realized: An empirical investigation

Omega

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 399-412

  Rai, A ^a   Patnayakuni, R ^a   Patnayakuni, N ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost benefit analysis; Information systems; Investment; Productivity; Technology

Indexed keywords

BUDGET CONTROL; COMPETITION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY; SALES; PRODUCTIVITY;

COST-BENEFITS ANALYSIS; EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION; FIRM PERFORMANCE; INTERACTION EFFECT; IT INVESTMENTS; LABOUR PRODUCTIVITIES; PERFORMANCE; PERFORMANCE MEASURE; SECONDARY SOURCES; TECHNOLOGY; BUSINESS MODEL; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC ASPECT; EMPIRICAL MODEL; FIRM STRATEGY; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INVESTMENT; STATISTICAL STUDY;

INVESTMENTS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0030201220     PISSN: 03050483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0305-0483(96)00009-6     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. 1. Bakos JY (1987) Dependent variables for the study of firm and industry-level impacts of information technology. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 10-23.
2. 2. Banker RD, Kauffman RJ and Morey RC (1990) Measuring gains in operational efficiency from information technology: a study of positran deployment at Hardees Inc. J. MIS. 7, 29-54.
3. 3. Barua A, Kreibel CH and Mukhopadhyay T (1995) Information technologies and business value: an analytic and empirical investigation. Info. Sys. Res. 6, 3-23.
4. 4. Bender DH (1986) Financial impact of information processing. J. MIS. 3, 22-32.
5. 5. Brynjolfsson E (1993) The productivity paradox of information technology. Comm. of the ACM 36, 67-77.
6. 6. Brynjolfsson E and Hitt L (1993) Is information systems spending productive? New evidence and new results. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 47-64.
7. 7. Business Week (1993) The technology payoff.14 June, 57-79.
8. 8. Cash JI and Konsynski BR (1985) IS redraws competitive boundaries. Harv. Bus. Rev. 64, 134-142.
9. 9. Cash JI, McFarlan FW and McKenney JL (1988) Corporate Information Systems Management: The Issues Facing Senior Executives. Irwin, Homewood, IL.
10. 10. Clemons EK and Kimbrough S (1986) Information systems, telecommunications and their effects on industrial organizations. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 99-108.
11. 11. Cron W and Sobol M (1983) The relationship between computerization and performance: a strategy for maximizing economic benefits of computerization. Info. Mgmt. 6, 171-181.
12. 12. Crowston K and Treacy M (1986) Assessing the impact of information technology on enterprise level performance. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 299-310.
13. 13. Dixon R and Smith DR (1993) Strategic management accounting. Omega 21, 605-618.
14. 14. Dos Santos BL and Peffers K (1995) Rewards to investors in innovative information technology applications: first movers and early followers in ATM's. Org. Sci. 6, 241-259.
15. 15. Dos Santos BL, Peffers K and Mauer DC (1992) The impact of information technology investment announcements on the market value of the firm. Info. Sys. Res. 4, 1-23.
16. 16. Economist (1990) A survey of information technology. 16 June, s5-s20.
17. 17. Eilon S (1992) Key ratios for corporate performance. Omega 20, 337-343.
18. 18. Gold B (1987) Technological innovation and economic performance. Omega 15, 361-370.
19. 19. Hammer M (1990) Reengineering work: don't automate, obliterate. Harv. Bus. Rev. 68, 104-112.
20. 20. Harris SE and Katz JL (1988) Profitability and information technology, capital intensity in the insurance industry. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 124-130.
21. 21. Harris SE and Katz JL (1991) Organizational performance and information technology investment intensity in the insurance industry. Org. Sci. 2, 263-295.
22. 22. Hitt L and Brynjolfsson E (1994) The three faces of IT value: theory and evidence. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 263-277.
23. 23. Kaplan RS (1986) Must CIM be justified on faith alone?. Harv. Bus. Rev. 64, 95-101.
24. 24. Kauffman RJ and Kriebel CH (1988) Identifying business value linkages for production processes involving information technology. In Advances in Working Capital Management: Volume II (Edited by Kim YH and Srinivasan V). JAI Press, New Haven, CT.
25. 25. Kauffman RJ and Weill P (1989) An evaluative framework for research on performance effects of information technology investment. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 377-388.
26. 26. Lichtenberg F (1993) The output contribution of computer equipment and personnel: a firm level analysis. Columbia Business School Working Paper.
27. 27. Loveman GW (1994) An assessment of the productivity impact of information technologies. In Information Technology and the Corporation of the 1990s: Research Studies (Edited by Allen TJ and Scott Moron MS), pp.84-110. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
28. 28. Lucas HC (1975) Performance and use of an information system. Mgmt. Sci. 21, 908-919.
29. 29. Morrison CJ and Brandt ER (1990) Assessing the productivity of information technology equipment in U.S. Manufacturing industries. Working paper #3582, National Bureau of Economic Research.
30. 30. Mukhopadhyay T, Kekre S and Kalathur S (1995) Business value of information technologies: a study of electronic data interchange. MISQ 19, 137-156.
31. 31. Neter J, Wasserman W and Kutner H (1989) Applied Linear Regression Models. Second edition. Richard D. Irwin Inc.
32. 32. Panko RR (1991) Is office productivity stagnant. MISQ June, 191-203.
33. 33. Porter ME and Millar VE (1985) How information gives you competitive advantage. Harv. Bus. Rev. July, 149-160.
34. 34. Quinn MA, Craumer MA and Weaver A (1993) Critical issues of information systems for 1993. The Sixth Annual Survey for Information Systems Management Issues, CSC Index, Cambridge, MA.
35. 35. Roach SS (1987) Technology and the service sector: America's hidden competitive challenge. In Economic Perspectives. Morgan Stanley and Co., New York.
36. 36. Roach SS (1988) Technology and the service sector: the hidden competitive challenge. Tech. Forecast. Soc. Change. 34, 387-403.
37. 37. Roach SS (1989) Pitfalls on the 'new' assembly line: can services learn from manufacturing? In Economic Perspectives. Morgan Stanley and Co., New York.
38. 38. Strassman PA (1988) Management productivity as an IT measure. In Managing Business Value Of Information Technologies (Edited by Berger P, Kobielus JG and Sutherland DE), pp. 17-55. ICIT Press, Washington, DC.
39. 39. Strassman PA (1989) Financial earnings don't measure up to I/s payoff in services sector. CIO J. 1, 22-27.
40. 40. Turner J (1985) Organizational performance, size and the use of data processing resources. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information Systems. Ann Arbor, MI.
41. 41. Venkatraman N (1994) IT-enabled business transformation: from automation to business scope redefinition. SI. Mgmt. Rev. Winter, 73-87.
42. 42. Weill P (1992) The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: a study of the valve manufacturing sector. Info. Sys. Res. 3, 307-333.
43. 43. Willcocks L (1992) Evaluating and Managing Information Systems Investments. Chapman and Hall, London.
44. 44. Willcocks L (1992) Evaluating information technology investments: research findings and reappraisal. J. Info. Sys. 2, 243-268.