Influence of new light curing units and bonding agents on the microleakage of class V composite resin restorations

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 409-413

  Pradelle Plasse, Nelly ^a   Besnault, Catherine ^a   Souad, Nechad ^a   Colon, Pierre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; FILTEK A110 COMPOSITE RESIN; OPTIBOND SOLO PLUS; POLYMER; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SINGLE BOND;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; LIGHT; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; POWER SUPPLY; RADIATION EXPOSURE; TOOTH DISEASE;

BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLIES; HUMANS; LIGHT; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; POLYMERS; RESIN CEMENTS;

EID: 1842486859     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Venhoven DAM, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Polymerization contraction and conversion of light curing BisGMA-based methacrylate resins. Biomaterials 1993; 14: 871-875.
2. Verluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent Res 1998; 77: 1435-1445.
3. Ferracane JL. Correlation between hardness and degree of conversion during the setting reaction of unfilled dental restorative resins. Dent Mat 1985; 1: 11-14.
4. Feilzer AJ, Dooren LH, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface. Eur J Oral Sci 1995; 103: 322-326.
5. Tarle Z, Meniga A, Ristic M, Sutalo J, Pichler G, Davidson CL. The effect of the photopolymerization method on the quality of composite resin samples. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 436-442.
6. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1636-1639.
7. Bouschlicher MR, Vargas MA, Boyer DB. Effect of composite type, light intensity, configuratoin factor and laser polymerization on polymerization contraction forces. Am J Dent 1997; 10: 88-96.
8. Yearn JA. Factors affecting cure of visible light activated composites. Int Dent J 1985; 35: 218-225.
9. Ferracane JL, Aday P, Matsumoto H, Marker VA. Relationship between shade and depth of cure for light-activated dental resin composites. Dent Mater 1986; 2: 80-84.
10. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations affected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1240-1243.
11. Lutz F, Krejci I, Oldenburg TR. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: A new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 1986; 17: 777-784.
12. Uno S, Asmussen E. Effect on bonding of curing through dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 1991; 49: 317-320.
13. Verluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res 1996; 75: 871-878.
14. Van Dijken JWV, Hörstedt P, Waem R. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: Interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 165-172.
15. Lösche GM. Marginal adaptation of Class II composite fillings: Guided polymerization vs reduced light intensity. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1: 1-9.
16. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater 1991; 7:107-113.
17. Sakaguchi RL, Berge HX. Reduced light energy density decreases post-gel contraction maintaining degree of conversion in composites. J Dent 1998; 26: 695-700.
18. Kidd E. Microleakage: A review. J Dent 1976; 4: 199-206.
19. Relief DH. Do adhesives prevent microleakage? Int Dent J 1994; 44: 19-26.
20. Brännström M, Linden L, Aström A. The hydrodynamics of the dental tubule and of pulp fluid. A discussion of its significance in relation to dentinal sensitivity. Caries Res 1967, 1: 310-317.
21. Brännström M, Linden L. The hydrodynamics of the dentine: its possible relationship to dentinal pain. Int Dent J 1972; 22: 219-227.
22. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, Syed SA. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: Its effects on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982; 11: 439-450.
23. Brännström M. The cause of post-restorative sensitivity and its prevention. J Endod 1986; 12: 475-481.
24. Cox CF, Keall CL, Keall HJ, Bergenholtz G. Biocompatibility of surface-sealed dental materials against exposed pulps. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 57: 1-8.
25. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Vanherle G. Marginal adaptation and retention of hybrid restorative materials in vivo. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 1208, (Abstr 10).
26. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982; 16: 265-273.
27. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998; 26: 1-20.
28. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Curtis JW Jr. Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on cure of resin composites. Oper Dent 1994; 19: 26-32.
29. Mills RW. Blue light emitting diodes - Another method of light curing? Br Dent J 1995; 178: 169.
30. Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Microleakage. J Dent 1992; 20: 3-10.
31. Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: A review. Oper Dent 1997; 22: 173-185.
32. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Dentine permeability and tracer tests. J Dent 1999; 27: 1-11.
33. Dejou J, Sindres V, Camps J. Influence of criteria on the results of in vitro evaluation of microleakage. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 342-349.
34. Chan KC, Swift EJ. Marginal seal of new generation dental bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 420-423.
35. Cagidiaco MC, Ferrari M, Vichi A, Davidson CL. Mapping of tubule and intertubule surface areas available for bonding in Class V and Class II preparations. J Dent 1997; 25: 379-389.
36. Santini A, Mitchell S. Microleakage of composite restorations bonded with three new dentin bonding agents. J Esthet Dent 1998; 10: 296-304.
37. Pilo R, Ben-Amar A. Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multiple-step dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 209-213.
38. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Davidson CL. Effect of two etching times on the sealing ability of Clerfil Liner Bond 2 in Class V restorations. J Dent Res 1997; 10: 66-70.
39. Opdam NJM, Roeters JJM, Burgersdijk RCW. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations. J Dent Res 1998; 11: 160-164.
40. Perdigao J, Frankenberger R, Rosa BT, Breschi L. New trends in dentin/enamel adhesion. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 25D-30D.
41. Pradelle N, Nechad S, Tavemier Bruno, Colon P. Influence of new dentin adhesives on the enamel-dentin/composite interfacial microleakage. Am J Dent, 2001;14:344-348.
42. Oilo G, Jorgensen KD. Effect of bevelling on the occurrence of fracture in the enamel surrounding composite resin fillings. J Oral Rehabil 1977; 4: 305-308.
43. Ireland E, Xu X, Burgess JO. Microleakage of beveled and non-bevelled Class 3 resin restorations. J Dent Res 1998; 77:939 (Abstr 207).
44. Burgess JO, DeGoes M, Walker R, Ripps AH. An evaluation of four light-curing units comparing soft and hard curing. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1999; 11: 125-32.
45. Althoff O, Hartung M. Advances in light curing. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 77D-81D.
46. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 146-148.
47. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. Dent Mater 1990; 6: 167-171.
48. Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, Peters MCRB. Curing light performance and polymerization of composite restorative materials. J Dent 1992; 20: 183-188.
49. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strenght and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems ? J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64: 658-664.
50. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeck B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 1999; 5: 128-137.
51. Goracci G, Mori G, de Martinis LC. Curing light intensity and marginal leakage of resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 355-362.
52. Leal FR, Bouschlicher MR. Microleakage in Class V restorations using varying power densities and durations. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 148 (Abstr 3132).
53. Martínez A, Falcon J, García-Godoy F, Saravia MA. Soft-start system polymerization using a hybrid composite vs packable composite: Microleakage study. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 148 (Abstr 3133).
54. Yoshikawa M, Morignami M, Tagami J. Environmental SEM observation on resin-tooth interface using slow-start curing method. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 148 (Absrr 38).
55. Uno S, Asmussen E. Marginal adaptation of a restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate. Scand J Dent Res 1991; 99: 440-444.
56. Unterbrink GL, Muessner R. Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems. J Dent 1995; 23:183-189.
57. Mehl A, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without 'softstart-polymerization'. J Dent 1997; 25: 321-30.
58. Koran P, Kurschner R. Effect of sequential versus continuous irradiation of a light-cured resin composite on shrinkage, viscosity, adhesion, and degree of polymerization. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 17-22.
59. Leinfelder KF. What intensity is best in light curing? J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130: 534.
60. Dennison JB, Yaman P, Seir R, Hamilton JC. Effect of variable light intensity on composite shrinkage. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 499-505.
61. Silikas N, Eliades G, Watts DC. Light intensity effects on resin-composite degree of conversion and shrinkage strain. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 292-296.
62. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Chan DC. Novel approach to measure composite conversion kinetics during exposure with stepped or continuous light. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11: 197-205.
63. Knezevic A, Tarle Z, Meniga A, Sutalo J, Pichler G, Ristic M. Degree of conversion and temperature rise during polymerization of composite resin samples with blue diodes. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28: 586-591.
64. Mills RW, Jandt KD, Ashworth SH. Dental composite depth of cure with halogen and blue light emitting diode technology. Br Dent J 1999; 186:388-391.
65. Fujibayashi K, Ishimaru K, Takahashi N, Kohno A. Newly developed curing unit using blue light emitting diodes. Dent Jap 1998; 34: 49-53.
66. Stahl F, Ashworth SH, Jandt KD, Mills RW. Light-emitting diode (LED) polymerization of dental composites: Flexural properties and polymerization potential Biomaterials 2000; 21: 1379-1385.
67. Jandt KD, Mills RW, Blackwell GB, Ashworth SH. Depth of cure and compressive strenght of dental composites cured with blue light emitting diodes (LED s). Dent Mater 2000; 16: 41-47.
68. Marais JT, Dannheimer MF, Germishuys PJ, Borman JW. Depth of cure of light-cured composite resin with light-curing units of different intensity. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1997; 52: 403-407.
69. Davidson-Kaban SS, Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Erdilek N. The effect of curing variations on bulk curing and wall to wall quality of two types and various shades of resin composites. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 344-352.
70. Besnault C, Pradelle-Plasse N, Picard B, Colon P. Effect of a LED versus halogen light cure polymerization on the curing characteristics of three composite resins. Am J Dent 2003;16:323-328.