Antiprotrusio Cages for Acetabular Revision

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 420, Issue , 2004, Pages 106-112

  Berry, Daniel J ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETABULOPLASTY; ACETABULUM FRACTURE; BONE DEFECT; BONE GRAFT; CONFERENCE PAPER; DISEASE SEVERITY; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE FIXATION; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT;

EID: 1842476844     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200403000-00015     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Berry DJ. Acetabular anti-protrusio rings and cages in revision total hip arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty. 1995;6:68-75.
2. Berry DJ, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD, et al. Pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 1999;81A:1692-1702.
3. Berry DJ, Muller ME. Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg. 1992;74B: 711-715.
4. Böhm P, Banzhaf S. Acetabular revision with allograft bone: 103 revisions with 3 reconstruction alternatives, followed for 0.3-13 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999;70:240-249.
5. Garbuz D, Morsi E, Gross AE. Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft: Study with a minimum 5 year followup. J Bone Joint Surg. 1996;78A:693-697.
6. Gill TJ, Sledge JB, Muller ME. The Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty: Indications, principles, and long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg. 1998;80B:946-953.
7. Gross AE, Wong P, Saleh KJ: Don't throw away the ring: Indications and use. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(4 Suppl 1):162-166.
8. Padgett DE, Kull L, Rosenberg A, et al. Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 1993;75A:663-673.
9. Perka C, Ludwig R. Reconstruction of segmental defects during revision procedures of the acetabulum with the Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:568-574.
10. Peters CL, Curtain M, Samuelson KM. Acetabular revision with the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage and cancellous allograft bone. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:307-312.
11. Rosson J, Schatzker J. The use of reinforcement rings to reconstruct deficient acetabula. J Bone Joint Surg. 1992;74B:716-720.
12. Saleh KJ, Jaroszynski G, Woodgate I, et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty with the use of structural acetabular allograft and reconstruction ring: A case series with a 10-year average followup. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15: 951-958.
13. Schatzker J, Wong MK. Acetabular revision: The role of rings and cages. Clin Orthop. 1999;369:187-197.
14. Tanzer M, Drucker D, Jasty M, et al. Revision of the acetabular component with an uncemented Harris-Galante porous coated prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1992;74A:987-994.
15. Udomkiat P, Dorr LD, Won YY, et al. Technical factors for success with metal ring acetabular reconstruction. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:961-969.
16. van der Linde M, Tonino A. Acetabular revision with impacted grafting and a reinforcement ring: 42 patients followed fora mean of 10 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72:221-227.
17. Wachtl SW, Jung M, Jakob RP, et al. The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in acetabular revision surgery: A mean followup of 12 years. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:959-963.
18. Winter E, Piert M, Volkmann R, et al. Allogeneic cancellous bone graft and a Burch-Schneider ring for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2001;83A:862-867.