Digital evolution in time-dependent fitness landscapes

Artificial Life

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 123-134

  Li, Ye ^a   Wilke, Claus O ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital organisms; Fluctuating environment; Quasi species

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; LOW PASS FILTERS;

DIGITAL EVOLUTION; DIGITAL ORGANISMS; LANDSCAPES;

BIOLOGY;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION; TIME;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTERS; EVOLUTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 1842454653     PISSN: 10645462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/106454604773563559     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Charlesworth, B. (1976). Recombination modification in a fluctuating environment. Genetics, 83, 181-195.
2. Charlesworth, B. (1988). The evolution of mate choice in a fluctuating environment. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 130, 191-204.
3. Charlesworth, B. (1993). The evolution of sex and recombination in a varying environment. Journal of Heredity, 84, 345-350.
4. Cooper, L. A., & Scott, T. W. (2001). Differential evolution of eastern equine encephalitis virus populations in response to host cell type. Genetics, 157, 1403-1412.
5. Eigen, M. (1971). Self-organization of matter and the evolution of macromolecules. Naturwissenschaften, 58, 465-523.
6. Eigen, M., & Schuster, P. (1979). The hypercycle - A principle of natural self-organization. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
7. Ishii, K., Matsuda, H., Iwasa, Y., & Sasaki, A. (1989). Evolutionary stable mutation rate in a periodically changing environment. Genetics, 121, 163-174.
8. Kamp, C., & Bornholdt, S. (2002). Co-evolution of quasispecies: B-cell mutation rates maximize viral error catastrophes. Physical Review Letters, 88, 068104.
9. Kamp, C., Wilke, C. O., Adami, C., & Bornholdt, S. (2002). Viral evolution under the pressure of an adaptive immune system - Optimal mutation rate for viral escape. Complexity, 8, 28-33.
10. Kimura, M. (1967). On the evolutionary adjustment of spontaneous mutation rates. Genetical Research, 9, 23-24.
11. Laakso, J., Kaitala, V., & Ranta, E. (2001). How does environmental variation translate into biological processes? Oikos, 92, 119-122.
12. Lande, R., & Shannon, S. (1996). The role of genetic variation and population persistence in a changhing environment. Evolution, 50, 434-437.
13. Leigh, E. G. (1970). Natural selection and mutability. American Naturalist, 104, 301-305.
14. Nilsson, M., & Snoad, N. (2000). Error thresholds on dynamic fitness landscapes. Physical Review Letters, 84, 191-194.
15. Nilsson, M., & Snoad, N. (2002). Optimal mutation rates in dynamic environments. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 64, 1033-1043.
16. Nilsson, M., & Snoad, N. (2002). Quasispecies evolution on a fitness landscape with a fluctuating peak. Physical Review E, 65, 031901.
17. Novella, I. S., Hershey, C. L., Escarmis, C., Domingo, E., & Holland, J. J. (1999). Lack of evolutionary stasis during alternating replication of an arbovirus in insect and mammalian cells. Journal of Molecular Biology, 287, 459-465.
18. Ofria, C., & Wilke, C. O. (2004). Avida: A software platform for research in computational evolutionary biology. Artificial Life, 10, 191, 229.
19. Ronnewinkel, C., Wilke, C. O., & Martinetz, T. (2001). Genetic algorithms in time-dependent environments. In Kallel, L., Naudts, B., and Rogers, A. (Eds.), Theoretical aspects of evolutionary computing, and natural computing (pp. 261-285). Springer-Verlag.
20. Sniegowski, P. D., Gerrish, P. J., & Lenski, R. E. (1997). Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli. Nature, 387, 703-705.
21. Taddei, F., Radman, M., Maynard-Smith, J., Toupance, B., Gouyon, P. H., & Godelle, B. (1997). Role of mutator alleles in adaptive evolution. Nature, 387, 700-702.
22. Travis, J. M. J., & Travis, E. R. (2002). Mutator dynamics in fluctuating environments. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 269, 591-597.
23. Turner, P. E., & Elena, S. F. (2000). Cost of host radiation in an RNA virus. Genetics, 156, 1465-1470.
24. Weaver, S. C., Brault, A. C., Kang, W., & Holland, J. J. (1999). Genetic and fitness changes accompanying adaptation of an arbovirus to vertebrate and invertebrate cell. Journal of Virology, 73, 4316-4326.
25. Wilke, C. O. (2002). Maternal effects in molecular evolution. Physical Review Letters, 88, 078101.
26. Wilke, C. O., & Adami, C. (2002). The biology of digital organisms. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 528-532.
27. Wilke, C. O., & Ronnenwinkel, C. (2001). Dynamic fitness landscapes: Expansions for small mutation rates. Physica A, 290, 475-490.
28. Wilke, C. O., Ronnewinkel, C., & Martinetz, T. (1999). Molecular evolution in time-dependent environments. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1674, 417-421.
29. Wilke, C. O., Ronnewinkel, C., & Martinez, T. (2001). Dynamic fitness landscapes in molecular evolution. Physics Reports, 349, 395-446.
30. Wilke, C. O., Wang, J. L., Ofria, C., Lenski, R. E., & Adami, C. (2001). Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rates leads to survival of the flatters. Nature, 412, 331-333.