Say it with me: Stuttering inhibited

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 161-168

  Saltuklaroglu, Tim ^a   Dayalu, Vikram N ^a   Kalinowski, Joseph ^a   Stuart, Andrew ^a   Rastatter, Michael P ^a  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; DYSARTHRIA; FEMALE; GESTURE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PARKINSON DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STUTTERING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOFEEDBACK (PSYCHOLOGY); CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; MALE; MEMORY; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; SPEECH THERAPY; STUTTERING; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 1842452650     PISSN: 13803395     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/jcen.26.2.161.28090     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ackermann, H., Konczak, J.R., & Hertrich, I. (1997). The temporal control of repetitive articulatory movements in parkinson's disease. Brain and Language, 56, 312-319.
2. Adams, M.R., & Ramig, P. (1980). Vocal characteristics of normal speakers and stutterers during choral speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 23, 457-469.
3. Andrews, G., Howie, P.M., Dozsa, M., & Guitar, B.E. (1982). Stuttering: Speech pattern characteristics under fluency-inducing conditions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 25, 208-216.
4. Barber, V. (1939). Studies in the psychology of stuttering: XV: Chorus reading as a distraction in stuttering. Journal of Speech Disorders, 4, 371-383.
5. Bloodstein, O. (1949). Conditions under which stuttering is reduced or absent: A review of literature. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 14, 295-302.
6. Bloodstein, O. (1995). A handbook on stuttering (5th ed.). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.
7. Browman, C.P., & Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49, 155-180.
8. Calvert, G.A., Brammer, M.J., Bullmore, E.T., Campbell, R., Iversen, S.D., & David, A.S. (1999). Response amplification in sensory-specific cortices during crossmodal binding. Neuroreport, 10, 2619-2623.
9. Calvert, G.A., Brammer, M.J., & Iversen, S.D. (1998). Crossmodal identification. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 247-253.
10. Campbell, R. (1998). Speechreading: Advances in understanding its cortical bases and implications for deafness and speech rehabilitation. Scandinavian Audiology, 49, 80-86.
11. Campbell, R., MacSweeney, M., Surguladze, S., Calvert, G., McGuire, P., Suckling, J., Brammer, M.J., & David, A.S. (2001). Cortical substrates for the perception of face actions: An fMRI study of the specificity of activation for seen speech and for meaningless lower-face acts (gurning). Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 233-243.
12. Cherry, E., & Sayers, B. (1956). Experiments upon total inhibition of stammering by external control and some clinical results. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1, 233-246.
13. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
14. Craig, A. (1998). Relapse following treatment for stuttering: A critical review and correlative data. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 23, 1-30.
15. Curio, G., Neuloh, G., Numminen, J., Jousmaki, V., & Hari, R. (2000). Speaking modifies voice-evoked activity in the human auditory cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 9, 183-191.
16. Dayalu, V.N., Saltuklaroglu, T., Kalinowski, J., Stuart, A., & Rastatter, M.P. (2001). Producing the vowel/a/ prior to speaking inhibits stuttering in english speaking adults. Neuroscience Letters, 306, 111-115.
17. Dodd, B. (1980). Interaction of auditory and visual information in speech perception. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 541-549.
18. Fleiss, J.L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
19. Fowler, C.A. (1986). An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 3-28.
20. Fox, P.T., Ingham, R.J., Ingham, J.C., Hirsch, T.B., Downs, J.H., Martin, C., Jerabek, P., Glass, T., & Lancaster, J.L. (1996). A PET study of the neural systems of stuttering. Nature, 382, 158-161.
21. Fox, P.T., Ingham, R.J., Ingham, J.C., Zamarripa, F., Xiong, J.H., & Lancaster, J.L. (2000). Brain correlates of stuttering and syllable production. Brain, 123, 1985-2004.
22. Grant, K.W., & Seitz, P.F. (2000). The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 1197-1208.
23. Grant, K.W., Walden, B.E., & Seitz, P.F. (1998). Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: Consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 2677-2690.
24. Healey, E.C., & Howe, S.W. (1987). Speech shadowing characteristics of stutterers under diotic and dichotic conditions. Journal of Communication Disorders, 20, 493-506.
25. Ho, A.K., Bradshaw, J.L., Cunnington, R., Phillips, J.G., & Lansek, R. (1998). Sequence heterogeneity in parkinsonian speech. Brain and Language, 64, 122-145.
26. Ingham, R.J., & Carroll, P.J. (1977). Listener judgment of differences in stutterers' nonstuttered speech during chorus and nonchorus reading conditions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 20, 293-302.
27. Ingham, R.J., & Packman, A. (1979). A further evaluation of the speech of stutterers during chorus and nonchorus reading conditions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 22, 784-793.
28. Kalinowski, J., & Dayalu, V.N. (2002). A common element in the immediate inducement of effortless, natural-sounding, fluent speech in people who stutter: 'The second speech signal'. Medical Hypotheses, 58, 61-66.
29. Kalinowski, J., Dayalu, V.N., Stuart, A., Rastatter, M.P., & Rami, M.K. (2000). Stutter-free and stutter-filled speech signals and their role in stuttering amelioration for English speaking adults. Neuroscience Letters, 293, 115-118.
30. Kalinowski, J., Stuart, A., Rastatter, M.P., Snyder, G., & Dayalu, V. (2000). Inducement of fluent speech in persons who stutter via visual choral speech. Neuroscience Letters, 281, 198-200.
31. Kempler, D., Van Lancker, D.K. (2002). Effect of speech task on intelligibility in dysarthria: A case study of Parkinson's disease. Brain and Language, 80, 449-464.
32. Kuhl, P.K. (1994). Learning and representation in speech and language. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4, 812-822.
33. Kuhl, P.K. (2000). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 11850-11857.
34. Kuhl, P.K., & Meltzoff, A.N. (1982). The bimodal perception of speech in infancy. Science, 218, 1138-1141.
35. Kuhl, P.K., & Meltzoff, A.N. (1996). Infant vocalizations in response to speech: Vocal imitation and developmental change. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 2438-2525.
36. Kuhl, P.K., Williams, K.A., & Meltzoff, A.N. (1991). Cross-Modal speech perception in adults and infants using nonspeech auditory stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 829-840.
37. Legerstee, M. (1990). Infants use multimodal information to imitate speech sounds. Infant Behavior and Development, 13, 343-354.
38. Liberman, A.M., & Mattingly, I.G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1-36.
39. MacKain, K., Studdert-Kennedy, M., Spieker, S., & Stern, D. (1983). Infant intermodal speech perception is a left-hemisphere function. Science, 219, 1347-1349.
40. Massaro, D.W. (1987). Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Massaro, D.W., & Cohen, M.M. (1983). Evaluation and integration of visual and auditory information in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 753-771.
42. Nishimura, H., Hashikawa, K., Doi, K., Iwaki, T., & Watanabe, Y. (1999). Sign language 'heard' in the auditory cortex. Nature, 397, 116.
43. Numminen, J., & Curio, G. (1999). Differential effects of overt, covert and replayed speech on vowel evoked responses of the human auditory cortex. Neuroscience Letters, 272, 29-32.
44. Numminen, J., Salmelin, R., & Hari, R. (1999). Subject's own speech reduces reactivity of the human auditory cortex. Neuroscience Letters, 265, 119-122.
45. Pattie, F.A., & Knight, B.B. (1944). Why does the speech of stutterers improve in chorus reading? Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 39, 362-367.
46. Perkins, W.H. (1992). Stuttering prevented. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.
47. Salmelin, R., Schnitzler, A., Schmitz, F., Jancke, L., Witte, O.W., & Freund, H.J. (1998). Functional organization of the auditory cortex is different in stutterers and fluent speakers. Neuroreport, 9, 2225-2229.
48. Sams, M., Aulanko, R., Hamalainen, M., Hari, R., Lounasmaa, O.V., Lu, S.T., & Simola, J. (1991). Seeing speech: Visual information from lip movements modifies activity in the human auditory cortex. Neuroscience Letters, 127, 141-145.
49. Silverman, F.H. (1996). Stuttering and other fluency disorders (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
50. Winer, B.J. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
51. F] deoxyglucose study of developmental stuttering. Neuroreport, 6, 501-505.