Stutter-free and stutter-filled speech signals and their role in stuttering amelioration for English speaking adults

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 293, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 115-118

  Kalinowski, Joseph ^a   Dayalu, Vikram N ^a   Stuart, Andrew ^a   Rastatter, Michael P ^a   Rami, Manish K ^b  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory feedback; Auditory signals; Choral speech; Speech gesture; Stuttering

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSONANT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH; STUTTERING; VOWEL;

ADULT; BIOFEEDBACK (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPEECH; STUTTERING;

EID: 0034722129     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3940(00)01509-3     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Adams M.R., Moore W.H. Jr. The effects of auditory masking on the anxiety level, frequency of dysfluency, and selected vocal characteristics of stutterers. J. Speech Hear. Res. 15:1972;572-578.
2. Andrews G., Craig A., Feyer A., Hoddinott S., Howie P., Neilson M. Stuttering: a review of research findings and theories circa 1982. J. Speech Hear. Disord. 45:1983;226-246.
3. Andrews G., Howie P.M., Dozsa M., Guitar B.E. Stuttering: speech pattern characteristics under fluency-inducing conditions. J. Speech Hear. Res. 25:1982;208-215.
4. Armson J., Kalinowski J., Stuart A. A model of stuttering remediation: multiple factors underlying fluency enhancement. Starkweather C.W., Peters H.F.M. Stuttering: Proceedings from The First World Congress on Fluency Disorders. 1995;296-300 University Press, Nijmegen.
5. Barber V. Studies in the psychology of stuttering: XV, Chorus reading as a distraction in stuttering. J. Speech Disord. 4:1939;371-383.
6. Bloodstein, O., A Handbook on Stuttering, 5th edn., Singular, San Diego, CA, 1995.
7. Boller F., Vrtunski P.B., Kim Y., Mack J.L. Delayed auditory feedback and aphasia. Cortex. 14:1978;212-226.
8. Cherry E., Sayers B. Experiments upon total inhibition of stammering by external control and some clinical results. J. Psychosom. Res. 1:1956;233-246.
9. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Edu. Psychol. Meas. 20:1960;37-46.
10. Conture E.G. Some effects of noise on the speaking behavior of stutterers. J. Speech Hear. Res. 17:1974;714-723.
11. Eisenson J. Stuttering as preservative behavior. Eisenson J. Stuttering: A Symposium. 1975;403-452 Harper & Row, New York.
12. Fleiss J.L. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd edn :1981;Wiley, New York.
13. Fox P.T., Ingham R.J., Ingham J.C., Hirsch T.B., Downs J.H., Martin C., Jerabek P., Glass T., Lancaster J.L. A PET study of the neural systems of stuttering. Nature. 382:1996;158-161.
14. Johnson W., Rosen L. Studies in psychology of stuttering: VII. Effect of certain changes in speech pattern upon frequency of stuttering. J. Speech Disord. 2:1937;105-109.
15. Kalinowski J., Armson J., Roland-Mieszkowski M., Stuart A., Gracco V.L. Effects of alterations in auditory feedback and speech rate on stuttering frequency. Lang. Speech. 36:1993;1-16.
16. Kalinowski J., Stuart A., Rastatter M.P., Snyder G., Dayalu V. Inducement of fluent speech in persons who stutter via visual choral speech. Neurosci. Lett. 281:2000;198-200.
17. Kuniszyk-Jozkowiak W., Smolka E., Adamczyk B. Effect of acoustical, visual, and tactile reverberation on speech fluency of stutterers. Folia Phoniatr. Logop. 48:1996;193-200.
18. Kuniszyk-Jozkowiak W., Smolka E., Adamczyk B. Effect of acoustical, visual, and tactile echo on speech fluency of stutterers. Folia Phoniatr. Logop. 49:1997;26-34.
19. May A.E., Hackwood A. Some effects of masking and eliminating low frequency feedback on the speech of stammerers. Behav. Res. Ther. 6:1968;219-223.
20. Wingate M.E. Stuttering: Theory and Treatment. 1976;Irvington, New York.
21. F] deoxyglucose study of developmental stuttering. NeuroReport. 6:1995;501-505.