A Screening Procedure for Prioritizing Riparian Management

Environmental Management

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 151-161

  Timm, Raymond K ^a   Wissmar, Robert C ^a   Small, John W ^b   Leschine, Thomas M ^c   Lucchetti, Gino ^d  

^a Box 355020 ^*  (United States)

^b LLC   (United States)

^c School of Marine Affairs   (United States)

^d Water and Land Resources Division   (United States)

Author keywords

Landscape ecology metrics; Natural and anthropogenic factors; Quantitative spatial assessment; Riparian management

Indexed keywords

CELLS; RIVERS;

ANTHROPOGENIC LANDSCAPE; FRAGMENTATIONS;

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING;

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT QUALITY; PATCH SIZE; RIPARIAN ZONE; SITE CHARACTERIZATION;

ARTICLE; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; HABITAT QUALITY; LANDSCAPE; RIPARIAN ECOSYSTEM; RIVER; UNITED STATES;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENT; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RIVERS; TREES; WASHINGTON; WATER SUPPLY;

CEDAR RIVER; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

RIPARIA;

EID: 1842425839     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-2980-z     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bisson, P. A., R. E. Bilby, M. D. Bryant, C. A. Dollof, G. B. Grette, R. A. House, M. L. Murphy, K.V. Koski, and J.R. Sedell. 1987. Large woody debris in forested streams in the Pacific Northwest: past, present, and future. In. Pages Pages 143-190 in E. O. Salo, and T. W. Cundy. Eds, Streamside Management: Forestry and Fishery Interactions. University of Washington, Institute of Forest Resources, Seattle.
2. Booth, D. B. (1984) Glacier dynamics and the development of glacial landforms in the eastern Puget lowland, Washington. PhD dissertation. Geological Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 217 pp.
3. Collins, B. D., and G.R. Pess. 1997. Critique of Washington's watershed analysis program. Journal of The American Water Resources Association 33:997-1010.
4. Denysius, M., and C. Nilsson. 1994. Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world. Science 266:753-762.
5. ESRI, (Environmental Systems Research Institute). 1999. ArcView GIS 3.2. Copyright 1992-1999. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California.
6. ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute). 2001. GRID 8.1. Copyright 1982-2001. Environmental Systems Research Institute Redlands, California.
7. Forman, R. T. T., and M. Godron. 1986. Landscape ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York 619 pp.
8. Frissell, C. A., W. J. Liss, C. E. Warren, and M. D. Hurley. 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environmental Management 10:199-214.
9. Galat, D. L., L. H. Fredrickson, D. D. Humburg, and K. L. Bataille. 1998. Flooding to restore connectivity of regulated, large-river wetlands. BioScience 48:721-733.
10. Gore, J. A., and F.D. Shields Jr. 1995. Can large rivers be restored?. BioScience 45:142-152.
11. Hanson, J. S., G. P. Malanson, and M. P. Armstrong. 1990. Landscape fragmentation and dispersal in a model of riparian forest dynamics. Ecological Modeling 49:277-296.
12. Harris, R., and C. Olson. 1997. Two-stage system for prioritizing riparian restoration at the stream reach and community scales. Restoration Ecology 5(48):34-42.
13. Kentula, M. E. 1997. A step toward a landscape approach in riparian restoration. Restoration Ecology 5:2-3.
14. King County. 1993. Cedar River current and future conditions report. King County Department of Public Works, Surface Water Management Division, Seattle, 322 pp.
15. King County. 1998. Lower Cedar River Basin and nonpoint pollution action plan. King County Department of Natural Resources, Seattle, 352 pp.
16. Kondolf, G. H. 1995. Geomorphological stream channel classification in aquatic habitat restoration: uses and limitations. Aquatic conservation. Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 5:127-141.
17. Lillesand, T. M., and R. W. Kiefer. 1994. Remote sensing and image interpretation. John Wiley & Sons, New York 750 pp.
18. May, C. W., and R. R. Horner. 2000. The cumulative impacts of watershed urbanization on stream-riparian ecosystems. In. Pages Pages 281-286 in P. J. Wigington, and R. L. Beschta. Eds, International conference on riparian ecology and management in multi-land use watersheds. American Water Resources Association, Middlesburg, Virginia.
19. McGarigal, K. and Marks, B. J. 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service, Portland, Oregon, 122 pp.
20. Mowrer, H. T. 1999. Accuracy (re)assurance: selling uncertainty assessment to the uncertain in. Pages pages 1-10 in K. Lawton, and A. Jaton. Eds, Spatial accuracy assessment: land information uncertainty in natural resources. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, Michigan.
21. Murphy, M. L., J. Heifetz, S. W. Johnson, K. V. Koski, and J. F. Thedinga. 1986. Effects of clear-cut logging with and without buffer strips on juvenile salmonids in Alaskan streams (USA). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 43:1521-1533.
22. NRC (National Research Council). 1992. Restoration of aquatic ecosystems. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
23. NRC (National Research Council). 1996. Upstream: salmon and society in the Pacific Northwest. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
24. Perkins, S. J. 1994. The shrinking Cedar River: channel changes following flow regulation and bank armoring. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 00:649-659.
25. Richter, B. D., and H. E. Richter. 2000. Prescribing flood regimes to sustain riparian ecosystems along meandering rivers. Conservation Biology 14:1467-1478.
26. Russell, G. D., C. P. M. Hawkins, and P. O'Neill. 1997. The role of GIS in selecting sites for riparian restoration at the San Luis Rey River, San Diego County, California. Restoration Ecology 5(48):56-68.
27. Schaefer, J. M., and M. T. Brown. 1992. Designing and protecting river corridors for wildlife. Rivers 3:14-26.
28. Tri-County (Tri-County Coalition). 2002. Regulation of near shore and aquatic development: a proposal to help protect salmonid habitat in the Puget Sound region. Report from the Technical Committee. Seattle, Washington.
29. Turner, M. G., R. H. Gardner, and R. V. O'Neill. 2001. Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and process. Springer-Verlag, New York 401 pp.
30. Ward, J. V., and J. A. Stanford. 1995. Ecological connectivity in alluvial river ecosystems and its disruption by flow regulation. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 11:105-119.
31. Wissmar, R. C., and R. L. Beschta. 1998. Restoration and Management of Riparian Ecosystems: a Catchment Perspective. Freshwater Biology 40:571-585.
32. Wissmar, R. C., and P. A. Bisson. 2003. Strategies for restoring river ecosystems: sources of variability and uncertainty in natural and management systems. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
33. Wissmar, R. C., D. C. Pflugh, and R.K. Timm. 2000. Changes in developed land cover (1991-1998): Cedar River, Washington, In. Page TPS-00-2, 616 pp in P. J. Wigington, and R. L. Beschta. Eds, Riparian ecology and management in multi-land use watersheds. American Water Resources Association, Middlesburg, Virginia.
34. Wissmar, R. C., J. H. Braatne, R. L. Beschta, and S. B. Rood. 2003. Variability of riparian ecosystems: implications for restoration. in. Pages Pages 107-127 in R. C. Wissmar, and P. A. Bisson. Eds, Strategies for restoring river ecosystems: sources of variability and uncertainty in natural and managed systems. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.