Two-stage system for prioritizing riparian restoration at the stream reach and community scales

Restoration Ecology

Volumn 5, Issue 4 SUPPL., 1997, Pages 34-42

  Harris, Richard ^a   Olson, Craig ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b VESTRA Resources Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0008074227     PISSN: 10612971     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.1997.00034.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Allen, J. R. L. 1965. A review of the origin and characteristics of recent alluvial sediments. Sedimentology 5:89-191.
2. Allen, J. R. L. 1970. Physical processes of sedimentation: an introduction. George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London.
3. Auble, G. T., J. M. Friedman, and M. L. Scott. 1994. Relating riparian vegetation to present and future streamflows. Ecological Applications 4:544-554.
4. Bach, L. B. 1995. Watershed assessment at the drainage basin scale. Pages 23-26 in R. R. Harris, R. Kattelmann, H. Kerner, and J. Woled, editors. Watersheds '94: Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Watershed Management Conference, November 16-18, 1994, Ashland, Oregon. Water Resources Center Report No. 86. University of California, Davis.
5. Brinson, M. 1993. A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. Technical Report WRP-DE-4. Wetlands Research Program, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
6. Campbell, G. J., and W. Green. 1968. Perpetual succession of stream channel vegetation in a semi-arid region. Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science 5:86-98.
7. Carlson, J. R., G. L. Conaway, J. L. Gibbs, and J. C. Hoag. 1992. Design criteria for revegetation in riparian zones of the intermountain area. Pages 145-150 in W. P. Clary, E. D. McArthur, D. Bedunah, and C. L. Wambolt, compilers. Proceedings of the Symposium on Ecology and Management of Riparian Shrub Communities, May 29-31, 1991, Sun Valley, Idaho. General Technical Report INT-289, U.S. Forest Service Experiment Station, Ogden, Utah.
8. Connin, S. 1991. Characteristics of successful riparian restoration projects in the Pacific Northwest. Water Division, U.S. EPA Region 10, Seattle, Washington.
9. Debano, L. F., and L. J. Schmidt. 1989. Interrelationship between watershed condition and health of riparian areas in southwestern United States. Pages 45-52 in R. E. Gresswell, B. A. Barton, and J. L. Kershner, editors. Proceedings of the Workshop: Practical Approaches to Riparian Resource Management, May 8-11, 1989. Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior, Billings, Montana.
10. Duggin, M. J., P. F. Hopkins, and R. H. Brock. 1990. A survey of remote sensing methodology for forest inventory. Pages 267-285 in V. J. LaBau and T. Cunia, editors. State-of-the-art methodology of forest inventory: a symposium proceedings, July 30-August 5, 1989. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-263. U.S. Forest Service, Syracuse, New York.
11. Fonda, R. W. 1974. Forest succession in relation to river terrace development in Olympic National Park. Ecology 55:927-942.
12. Frissell, L. A., W. J. Liss, C. E. Warren, and M. D. Hurley. 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environmental Management 10:199-214.
13. Gauch, H. G., Jr. 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
14. Gregory, S. V., G. A. Lamberti, and K. M. S. Moore. 1989. Influence of valley floor landforms on stream ecosystems. Pages 3-8 in D. L. Abell, technical coordinator. Proceedings of the California Riparian Systems Conference: Protection, Management, and Restoration for the 1990s, September 22-24, 1988, Davis, California. General Technical Report PSW-110. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, U.S. Forest Service, Berkeley, California.
15. Hack, J. T. 1973. Stream-profile analysis and stream gradient index. U.S. Geological Survey, Journal of Research 1:421-429.
16. Harms, J. C., and R. K. Fahnestock. 1965. Stratification, bedforms and flow phenomena (with an illustration from the Rio Grande). Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication 12:84-115.
17. Harris, R. R. 1987. Occurrence of vegetation on geomorphic surfaces in the active flood plain of a California alluvial stream. The American Midland Naturalist 118:393-405.
18. Harris, R. R. 1988. Associations between stream valley geomorphology and riparian vegetation as a basis for landscape analysis in the eastern Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Environmental Management 12:219-228.
19. Harris, R. R. 1989. Riparian communities of the Sierra Nevada and their environmental relationships. Pages 393-398 in D. L. Abell, technical coordinator. Proceedings of the California Riparian Systems Conference: Protection, Management and Restoration for the 1990s, September 22-24, 1988, Davis, California. General Technical Report PSW-110. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, U.S. Forest Service, Berkeley, California.
20. Hawk, G. M., and D. B. Zobel. 1974. Forest succession on alluvial landforms of the McKenzie River valley, Oregon. Northwest Science 48:245-265.
21. Hendricks, B. J., and J. P. Rieger. 1989. Description of nesting habitat for least Bell's vireo in San Diego County. Pages 285-292 in D. L. Abel, technical coordinator. Proceedings of the California Riparian Systems Conference: Protection, Management, and Restoration for the 1990s, September 22-24, 1988, Davis, California. General Technical Report PSW-110. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, U.S. Forest Service, Berkeley, California.
22. Hupp, C. R. 1982. Stream-grade variation and riparian forest ecology along Passage Creek, Virginia. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 109:488-499.
23. Hupp, C. R. 1986. The headward extent of fluvial landforms and associated vegetation on Massanutten Mountain, Virginia. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 11:545-555.
24. Hupp, C. R., and W. R. Osterkamp. 1985. Bottomland vegetation distribution along Passage Creek, Virginia, in relation to fluvial landforms. Ecology 66:670-681.
25. Johnson, C. A. 1994. Cumulative effects to wetlands. Wetlands 14: 49-55.
26. Jongman, R. H. G., and T. J. van de Nes. 1995. Restoration and maintenance of artificial brooks in the Veluwe, the Netherlands. Pages 266-274 in R. H. G. Jongman, C. J. F. Ter Braak, and O. F. R. van Tongeren, editors. Data analysis in community landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
27. Kellerhals, R., M. Church, and D. L. Bray. 1976. Classification and analysis of river processes. Journal of Hydraulics Division Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers, Volume 102, Number HY7.
28. Kondolf, G. M. 1995. Learning from stream restoration projects. Pages 107-110 in R. R. Harris, R. Kattelmann, H. Kerner, and J. Woled, editors. Watersheds '94: Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Watershed Management Conference, November 16-18, 1994, Ashland, Oregon. Water Resources Center Report No. 86. University of California, Davis.
29. Kondolf, G. M., and M. Larson. 1995. Historical channel analysis and its application to riparian and aquatic habitat restoration. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 5:1-18.
30. Ludwig, J. A., and J. F. Reynolds. 1988. Statistical ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
31. McBride, J. R., and J. Strahan. 1985. Establishment and survival of woody riparian species on gravel bars of an intermittent stream. The American Midland Naturalist 112:235-245.
32. Mueller-Dombois, D., and H. Ellenberg. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
33. Nehlsen, W. 1997. Prioritizing watersheds in Oregon for salmon restoration. Restoration Ecology 5:4S:25-33.
34. Olson, C., and R. Harris. 1997. Applying a two-stage system to prioritize riparian restoration at the San Luis Rey River, San Diego County, California. Restoration Ecology 5:4S:43-55.
35. Osterkamp, W. R., and C. R. Hupp. 1984. Geomorphic and vegetative characteristics along three northern Virginia streams. Geological Society of America Bulletin 95:1093-1101.
36. Petts, G. E. 1990. The role of ecotones in aquatic landscape management. Pages 227-261 in R. J. Naiman and H. Decamps, editors. The ecology and management of aquatic-terrestrial ecotones. UNESCO Man and Biosphere Series, Vol. 4. Parthenon Publishing Group Limited, Park Ridge, New Jersey.
37. Pinay, G., H. Decamps, E. Chauet, and E. Fustec. 1990. Functions of ecotones in fluvial systems. Pages 141-169 in R. J. Naiman and H. Decamps, editors. The ecology and management of aquatic-terrestrial ecotones. UNESCO Man and Biosphere Series, Vol. 4. Parthenon Publishing Group Limited, Park Ridge, New Jersey.
38. Platts, W. S., C. Amour, G. D. Booth, M. Bryant, J. L. Bufford, P. Cuplin, S. Jensen, G. W. Lienkaemper, G. W. Minshall, S. B. Monsen, R. L. Nelson, J. R. Sedell, and J. S. Tuhy. 1987. Methods for evaluating riparian habitats with applications to management. General Technical Report INT 221. U.S. Forest Service Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, Utah.
39. Regional Ecosystem Office. 1995. Ecosystem analysis at the watershed scale: federal guide for watershed analysis. Version 2.2. Portland, Oregon.
40. Richards, K. 1982. Rivers: form and process in alluvial changes. Methuen and Co., New York.
41. Risser, R. J., and R. R. Harris. 1990. Mitigation for impacts to riparian vegetation on western montane streams. Pages 235-250 in J. A. Gore and G. E. Petts, editors. Alternatives in regulated river management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
42. Rosgen, D. L. 1985. A stream classification system. Pages 91-95 in R. R. Johnson, C. D. Zeibell, D. R. Patton, P. F. Ffolliott, and R. H. Hamre, editors. Riparian ecosystems and their management: reconciling conflicting uses. General Technical Report RM 120. U.S. Forest Service, Fort Collins, Colorado.
43. Schreuder, H. T., T. G. Gregoire, and G. B. Wood. 1993. Sampling methods for multiresource forest sampling. Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
44. Shreffler, D. K., and R. M. Thorn. 1993. Restoration of urban estuaries: new approaches for site location and design. Unpublished report to Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Aquatic Lands Division, Olympia, Washington.
45. Stromberg, J. C., and D. T. Patten. 1990. Riparian vegetation instream flow requirements: a case study from a diverted stream in the eastern Sierra Nevada, California. Environmental Management 14:185-194.
46. Stromberg, J. C., and D. T. Patten. 1991. Instream flow requirements for cottonwoods at Bishop Creek, Inyo County, California. Rivers 2:1-11.
47. Szaro, R. C. 1990. Southwestern riparian plant communities: site characteristics, tree species distributions and size class structures. Forest Ecology and Management 33/34:315-334.
48. Technical Riparian Work Group. 1992. Integrated riparian evaluation guide. Unpublished report. U.S. Forest Service Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, Utah.
49. Thomas, R. W., and S. D. DeGloria. 1979. Large-scale aerial photography as a sample stage in wildland resource inventories. Pages 15-23 in American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Proceedings of the Seventh Biennial Workshop on Color Aerial Photography in the Plant Sciences, May 15-17, 1979, University of California, Davis.
50. Wissmar, R. C., and F. J. Swanson. 1990. Landscape disturbances and lotic ecotones. Pages 65-89 in R. J. Naiman and H. Decamps, editors. The ecology and management of aquatic-terrestrial ecotones. UNESCO Man and Biosphere Series, Vol. 4. Parthenon Publishing Group Limited, Park Ridge, New Jersey.