Shear bond strength, bond failure, and scanning electron microscopy analysis of a new flowable composite for orthodontic use

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 410-415

  D'Attilio, Michele ^a   Traini, Tonino ^a   Di Iorio, Donato ^a   Varvara, Giuseppe ^a   Festa, Felice ^a   Tecco, Simona ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bond failure; Brackets; Composite; Flowable; Shear bond strength

Indexed keywords

METAL; RESIN;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; ENAMEL; EVALUATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INCUBATION TIME; ORTHODONTICS; PREMOLAR TOOTH; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SHEAR STRENGTH; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOOTH EXTRACTION;

EID: 18244409357     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Newman GV. Epoxy adhesive for orthodontic attachments: progress report. Am J Orthod. 1965;51:901-912.
2. Silverman E, Cohen M, Anthony G, Dietz V. A universal direct bonding system for both metal and plastic brackets. Am J Orthod. 1972;62:236-244.
3. Pus MD, Way DC. Enamel loss due to orthodontic bonding with filled and unfilled resins using various clean-up techniques. Am J Orthod. 1980;77:269-283.
4. Zachrisson BU, Årtun J. Enamel surface appearance after various debonding techniques. Am J Orthod. 1979;75:121-137.
5. Elaut J, Asscherickx K, Vande Vannet B, Wehrbein H. Flowable composites for bonding lingual retainers. J Clin Orthod. 2002;36:597-598.
6. Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Heymann HO. Protection hypothesis for composite wear. Dent Mater. 1992;8:305-309.
7. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998;129:567-577.
8. Wang WN, Meng CL. A study of bond strength between light-and self-cured orthodontic resin. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;101:350-354.
9. Harari D, Aunni E, Gillis I, Redlich M. A new multipurpose dental adhesive for orthodontic use: an in vitro bond strength study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;118:307-310.
10. Katona TR. A comparison of the stresses developed in tension, shear peel, and torsion strength testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:244-251.
11. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1984;85:333-340.
12. Lalani N, Foley TF, Voth R, Banting D, Mamandras AH. Polymerization with the argon laser: curing time and shear bond strength. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:525-534.
13. Reynolds JR, Von Fraunhofer JA. Direct bonding of orthodontic attachments to the teeth: the relation of adhesive bond strength to gauze mesh size. Br J Orthod. 1976;3:91-95.
14. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1975;2:171-178.
15. Bishara SE, Olsen ME, Damon P, Jakobson JR. Evaluation of a new light-cured orthodontic bonding adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:80-87.
16. Meehan PM, Foley TF, Mamandras AH. A comparison of the shear bond strengths of two glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:125-132.
17. Willems G, Carels CEL, Verbene G. In vitro peel/shear bond strength of orthodontic adhesives. J Dent. 1997;25:263-270.
18. Rock WP, Abdullah MSB. Shear bond strengths produced by composite and compomer light cured orthodontic adhesives. J Dent. 1997;25:243-249.
19. Sinha PK, Nanda RS, Duncanson MG, Hosier MJ. In vitro evaluation of matrix-bound fluoride-releasing orthodontic bonding adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:276-282.
20. Tang ATH, Bjrkman L, Adamczak E, Andlin-Sobocki A, Ekstrand J. In vitro shear bond strength of orthodontic bondings without liquid resin. Acta Odontol Scand. 2000;58:44-48.
21. Rix D, Foley TF, Mamandras A. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:36-42.
22. Bryant S, Retief DH, Russell CM, Denys FR. Tensile bond strengths of orthodontic bonding resins and attachments to etched enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;92:225-231.
23. El Alam R, Sorel O, Cathelineau G. Comparison morphologique de l'intrados des bases de différentes attaches orthodontiques métalliques observées au microscope électronique à balayage. Orthod Fr. 1997;68:355.
24. MacColl GA, Rossouw PE, Titley KC, Yamin C. The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:276-281.