Stream fish assemblages in relation to landscape position and local habitat variables

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 134, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 430-440

  Smith, Tamara A ^a   Kraft, Clifford E ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; FISH; HABITAT STRUCTURE; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; WATER TEMPERATURE;

BEAVERKILL RIVER; NEW YORK [UNITED STATES]; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EID: 18244390227     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/T03-051.1     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Benda, L., N. L. Poff, D. Miller, T. Dunne, G. Reeves, G. Pess, and M. Pollock. 2004. The network dynamics hypothesis: how channel networks structure riverine habitats. Bioscience 54:413-427.
2. Bowlby, J. N., and J. C. Roff. 1986. Trout biomass and habitat relationships in southern Ontario, Canada, streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 115:503-514.
3. Drake, M. T. and W. W. Taylor. 1996. Influencing of spring and summer water temperature on brook char, Salvelinus fontinalis, growth and age structure in the Ford River, Michigan. Environmental Biology of Fishes 45:41-51.
4. Fairchild, G. W., R. J. Horwitz, D. A. Nieman, M. R. Boyer, and D. F. Knorr. 1998. Spatial variation and historical change in fish assemblages of the Schuylkill River drainage, southeast Pennsylvania. American Midland Naturalist 139:282-295.
5. Fausch, K. D. 1988. Tests of competition between native and introduced salmonids in streams: what have we learned? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 45:2238-2246.
6. Fausch, K. D., N. Shigeru, and K. Ishigaki. 1994. Distribution of two congeneric charrs in streams of Hokkaido Island, Japan: considering multiple factors across scales. Oecologia (Berlin) 100:1-12.
7. Gauch, H. G. 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York.
8. Gorman, O. T. 1986. Assemblage organization of stream fishes: the effects of rivers on adventitious streams. American Naturalist 128:611-616.
9. Gregory, S. V., F. J. Swanson, W. A. McKee, and K. W. Cummins. 1991. Ecosystem perspectives of riparian zones. Bioscience 41:540-551.
10. Heggenes, J. 1988. Substrate preferences of brown trout fry (Salmo trutta) in artificial stream channels. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 45:1801-1806.
11. Heggenes, J., J. L. Bagliniere, and R. A. Cunjak. 1999. Spatial niche variability for young Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brown trout (S. trutta) in heterogeneous streams. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 8:1-21.
12. Hill, J., and G. D. Grossman. 1987. Home range estimates for three North American stream fishes. Copeia 1987:376-380.
13. Jackson, D. A., P. R. Peres Neto, and J. D. Olden. 2001. What controls who is where in freshwater fish assemblages: the roles of biotic, abiotic, and spatial factors. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:157-170.
14. Levy, P. S., and S. Lemeshow. 1999. Sampling of population methods and applications. Wiley, New York.
15. Lyons, J. 1996. Patterns in the species distribution of fish assemblages among Wisconsin streams. Environmental Biology of Fishes 45:329-341.
16. Matthews, W. J., and H. W. Robison. 1998. Influence of drainage connectivity, drainage area, and regional species richness on fishes of the interior highlands in Arkansas. American Midland Naturalist 139:1-19.
17. McCune, B., and J. B. Grace. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon.
18. McNeely, D. L. 1986. Longitudinal patterns in the fish assemblages of an Ozark, USA stream. Southwestern Naturalist 31:375-380.
19. Minns, C. K. 1995. Allometry of home range size in lake and river fishes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52:1499-1508.
20. Nieman, D. A. 1996. Perspectives on the recent status of redfin pickerel in the Schuylkill River basin of southeast Pennsylvania. Pages 1-27 in R. Soderberg, editor. Warmwater workshop proceedings: esocid management and culture. American Fisheries Society, Northeast Division, Mansfield, Pennsylvania.
21. Osborne, L. L., and M. J. Wiley. 1992. Influence of tributary spatial position on the structure of warmwater fish assemblages. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49:671-681.
22. Paller, M. H. 1994. Relationships between fish assemblage structure and stream order in South Carolina coastal plain streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 123:150-161.
23. Palmer, M. W. 1993. Putting things in even better order: the advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 74:2215-2230.
24. Peterson, J. T., and C. F. Rabeni. 2001. The relation of fish assemblages to channel units in an Ozark stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130:911-926.
25. Richards, C., L. B. Johnson, and G. E. Host. 1996. Landscape-scale influences on stream habitats and biota. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53(Supplement 1):295-311.
26. Schlosser, I. J. 1995. Critical landscape attributes that influence fish population dynamics in headwaters streams. Hydrobiologia 303:71-81.
27. Sheldon, A. L., and G. K. Meffe. 1995. Short-term recolonization by fishes of experimentally defaunated pools of a coastal plain stream. Copeia 1995:828-837.
28. Shreve, R. L. 1966. Statistical law of stream numbers. Journal of Geology 74:1737.
29. Simonson, T. D., J. Lyons, and P. D. Kenehl. 1994. Guidelines for evaluating fish habitat in Wisconsin streams. U.S. Forest Service, General Technical Report NC 164,.
30. Strahler, A. N. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions, American Geophysical Union 38:913-920.
31. Symons, P. E. K., J. L. Metcalfe, and G. D. Harding. 1976. Upper lethal and preferred temperatures of the slimy sculpin Cottus cognatus. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 33;180-183.
32. Taniguchi, Y., F. J. Rahel, D. C. Novinger, and K. G. Gerow. 1998. Temperature mediation of competitive interactions among three fish species that replace each other along longitudinal stream gradients. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:1894-1901.
33. ter Braak, C. J. F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvalue technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 65:1167-1179.
34. ter Braak, C. J. F. and P. F. M. Verdonschot. 1995. Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquatic Sciences 57:255-289.
35. ter Braak, C. J. F. and P. Smilauer. 1998. CANOCO reference manual and user's guide to CANOCO for Windows: software for canonical community ordination, version 4. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York.
36. Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell, and C. E. Cushing. 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37:130-137.
37. Van Put, E. 1996. The Beaverkill. Lyons & Burford, New York.