Patterns in the species composition of fish assemblages among Wisconsin streams

Environmental Biology of Fishes

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 329-341

  Lyons, John ^a  

^a WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Canonical correspondence analysis; Classification; Community ecology; Ecoregions; Environmental gradients; Ordination; Stream temperature

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENT; FISH ASSEMBLAGE;

USA, WISCONSIN;

CATOSTOMIDAE; CENTRARCHIDAE; COTTIDAE; CYPRINIDAE; ICTALURIDAE; PERCIDAE; PETROMYZONTIDAE; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 0029666834     PISSN: 03781909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00002524     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Balon, E.K. & D.J. Stewart. 1983. Fish assemblages in a river with unusual gradient (Luongo, Africa - Zaire system), reflections on river zonation, and description of another new species. Env. Biol. Fish. 9: 225-252.
2. Becker, G.C. 1983. Fishes of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison. 1052 pp.
3. Beecher, H.A., E.R. Dott & R.F. Fernau. 1988. Fish species richness and stream order in Washington state streams. Env. Biol. Fish. 22:193-209.
4. Conquest, L.L., S.C. Ralph & R.J. Naiman. 1994. Implementation of large-scale stream monitoring efforts: sampling design and data analysis issues. pp. 69-90. In: S.L. Loeb & A. Spacie (ed.) Biological Monitoring of Aquatic Systems, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
5. Eadie, J.M., T.A. Hurley, R.D. Montgomery & K.L. Teather. 1986. Lakes and rivers as islands: species-area relationships in the fish faunas of Ontario. Env. Biol. Fish. 15: 81-89.
6. Frissell, C.A., W.J. Liss, C.E. Warren & M.D. Hurley. 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Env. Manag. 10:199-214.
7. Gauch, H.G. 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York. 298 pp.
8. Hawkes, C.L., D.L. Miller & WG. Layher. 1986. Fish ecoregions of Kansas: stream fish assemblage patterns and associated environmental correlates. Env. Biol. Fish. 17: 267-279.
9. Hawkes, H.A. 1975. River zonation and classification. pp. 312-374. In: B.A. Whitton (ed.) River Zonation and Classification, University of California Press, Berkeley.
10. Hudson, P.L., P.W. Griffiths & T.J. Wheaton. 1992. Review of habitat classification schemes appropriate to streams, rivers, and connecting channels in the Great Lakes basin. pp. 74-107. In: W.D.N. Busch & P.G. Sly (ed.) The Development of an Aquatic Habitat Classification System for Lakes, CRC Press, Ann Arbor.
11. Hughes, R.M., S.A. Heiskary, W.J. Matthews & C.O. Yoder. 1994. Uses of ecoregions in biological monitoring. pp. 125-151. In: S.L. Loeb & A. Spacie (ed.) Biological Monitoring of Aquatic Systems, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
12. Hughes, R.M., E. Rexstad & C.E. Bond. 1987. The relationship of aquatic ecoregions, river basins, and physiographic provinces to the ichthyogeographic regions of Oregon. Copeia 1987: 423-432.
13. Larsen, D.P., J.M. Omernik, R.M. Hughes, C.M. Rohm, T.R. Whittier, A.J. Kinney, A.L. Gallant & D.R. Dudley. 1986. Correspondence between spatial patterns in fish assemblages in Ohio streams and aquatic ecoregions. Env. Manag. 10: 815-828.
14. Lyons, J. 1989. Correspondence between the distribution of fish assemblages in Wisconsin streams and Omernik's ecoregions. Amer. Midl. Nat. 122:163-182.
15. Lyons, J. 1991. Predicting smallmouth bass presence/absence and abundance in Wisconsin streams using physical habitat characteristics. pp. 96-103. In: D.C. Jackson (ed.) The First International Smallmouth Bass Symposium, Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State.
16. Matthews, W.J., D.J. Hough & H.W. Robison. 1992. Similarities in fish distribution and water quality patterns in streams of Arkansas: congruence of multivariate analyses. Copeia 1992: 296-305.
17. Matthews, W.J. & H.W. Robison. 1988. The distribution of the fishes of Arkansas: a multivariate analysis. Copeia 1988: 358-374.
18. Omernik, J.M. 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geographers 77:118-125.
19. Palmer, M.W 1993. Putting things in even better order: the advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 74: 2215-2230.
20. Pflieger, W.L. 1971. A distributional study of Missouri fishes. Pub. University of Kansas, Mus. Nat. History, Lawrence 20: 225-270.
21. Pflieger, W.L., M.A. Schene & P.S. Haverland. 1981. Techniques for the classification of stream habitats, with examples of their application in defining the stream habitats of Missouri. pp. 362-368. In: N.B. Armantrout (ed.) Acquisition and Utilization of Aquatic Habitat Inventory Information: Proceedings of a Symposium, Western Div., Amer. Fish. Soc., Bethesda.
22. Poff, N.L. & J.D. Allan. 1995. Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrological variability. Ecology 76: 606-627.
23. Reynolds, J.B. 1983. Electrofishing. pp. 147-164. In: L.A. Nielsen & D.L. Johnson (ed.) Fisheries Techniques. Amer. Fish. Soc., Bethesda.
24. Rohm, C.M., J.W. Giese & C.C. Bennett. 1987. Test of an aquatic ecoregion classification of streams in Arkansas. J. Freshwater Ecol. 4:127-140.
25. Smith, G.R. & D.R. Fisher. 1970. Factor analysis of distribution patterns of Kansas fishes. pp. 259-270. In: W. Dort & J.K. Jones (ed.) Pleistocene and Recent Environments of the Central Great Plains, Spec. Pub. 3, University of Kansas, Department Geology, Lawrence.
26. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167-1179.
27. ter Braak, C.J.F. & I.C. Prentice. 1988. A theory of gradient analysis. Adv. Ecol. Res. 18: 271-317.
28. Threinen, C.W. & R. Poff. 1963. The geography of Wisconsin's trout streams. Trans. Wisconsin Acad. Sci. Arts. Lett. 52: 57-75.
29. Whittier, T.R., R.M. Hughes & D.P. Larsen. 1988. Correspondence between ecoregions and spatial patterns in stream ecosystems in Oregon. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45: 1264-1278.