The welfare of the child

Human Fertility

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 13-17

  Parker, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIEMETIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; BENEFICENCE; CHILD; CHILD WELFARE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FETUS RISK; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; JUSTICE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MORALITY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; OOCYTE DONATION; OVULATION INDUCTION; UNITED KINGDOM;

GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; HUMAN FERTILISATION AND EMBRYOLOGY ACT 1990 (GREAT BRITAIN);

CHILD; CHILD WELFARE; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED;

EID: 18244374419     PISSN: 14647273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14647270500050371     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Blyth, E. (1995). The United Kingdom's Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 and the welfare of the child: a critique. International Journal of Children's Rights, 3(3/4), 417-438.
2. Blyth, E., & Cameron, C. (1998). The Welfare of the child: an emerging issue in the regulation of assisted conception. Human Reproduction, 13, 2339-2342.
3. Cannold, L., & Gillam, L. (2002). Regulation, consultation and divergent community views: the case of access to ART by lesbian and single women. Journal of Law and Medicine, 9, 498-510.
4. Devlin, N., & Parkin, D. (2003). Funding fertility: issues in the allocation and distribution of resources to assisted reproductive technologies. Human Fertility (Camb), 6(2 Suppl), s2-6.
5. Dower, T. (2001). Redefining family: should lesbians have access to assisted reproduction? Melbourne University Law Review, 25(2), 466-80.
6. Guardian Newspaper (2004). Sold into slavery - scandal of children smuggled into Britain, London: Guardian Newspaper Website http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,859731,00.html accessed on 14.4.04.
7. Harris, J. (1985). The Value of Life. London: Routledge, p 8
8. Hope, T., & McMillan, J. (2003). Ethical problems before conception. Lancet, 361(9375), 2164.
9. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act (1990) Section 13 (2) 5.
10. Landgridge, D. (2000). The welfare of the child: problems of indeterminacy and deontology. Human Reproduction, 15, 502-504.
11. Mill, J. S. (1859). On liberty. In Utilitarianism, on liberty, considerations on representative government. 1993 (p. 177). London: Everyman.
12. Nussbaum, M. (2600). Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
13. Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons (p. 356). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Pennings, G. (1999). Measuring the welfare of the child: in search of the appropriate evaluation principle. Human Reproduction, 14, 1146-1150.
15. Robertson, J. A. (1994). Children of choice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
16. Savulescu, J. (2001). Procreative Beneficence: why we should select the best children. Bioethics, 15(5-6), 413-426.
17. Spriggs, M., & Charles, T. (2003). Should HIV discordant couples have access to assisted reproductive technologies? Journal of Medical Ethics, 29(6), 325-329.
18. Stern, J. E., Cramer, C. P., Green, R. M., Garrod, A., & De Vries, K. 0. (2003). Determining access to assisted reproductive technology: reactions of clinical directors to ethically complex case scenarios. Human Reproduction, 18, 1343-1352.