Regulation, consultation and divergent community views: the case of access to ART by lesbian and single women.

Journal of law and medicine

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 498-510

  Cannold, Leslie ^a   Gillam, Lynn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AUSTRALIA; BIOETHICS; FEMALE; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; LEGAL APPROACH; LEGAL ASPECT; LESBIAN; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; MORALITY; PATIENT REFERRAL; REVIEW; STANDARD; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; LEGAL APPROACH;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AUSTRALIA; BIOETHICS; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HOMOSEXUALITY, FEMALE; HUMANS; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL, HETEROLOGOUS; LEGISLATION, MEDICAL; MORALS; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

EID: 0036560499     PISSN: 1320159X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (35)