Quantum benchmark for storage and transmission of coherent states

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 94, Issue 15, 2005, Pages

  Hammerer, K ^a   Wolf, M M ^a   Polzik, E S ^b,c   Cirac, J I ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR QUANTENOPTIK   (Germany)

^b QUANTOP   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINUOUS VARIABLE SYSTEMS; QUANTUM MEMORIES; QUANTUM STATES; QUANTUM TELEPORTATION;

COMMUNICATION CHANNELS (INFORMATION THEORY); EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PROBLEM SOLVING; QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 18144431029     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.150503     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2000).
2. C. H. Bennett et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
3. L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. A, 49, 1473 (1994); S. L. Braunstein and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, 869 (1998).
4. L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. A, 49, 1473 (1994); S. L. Braunstein and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, 869 (1998).
5. D. Bouwmeester et al., Nature (London) 390, 575 (1997); D. Fattal et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 037904 (2004); I. Marcikic et al., Nature (London) 421, 509 (2003); Y.-H. Kim et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1370 (2001); D. Boschi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1121 (1998); R. Ursinn et al., Nature (London) 430, 849 (2004); J.-W. Pan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4435 (2001). (The average fidelities in these experiments were 0.70, 0.80, 0.81, 0.83, 0.85, 0.87, and 0.89, respectively.)
6. D. Bouwmeester et al., Nature (London) 390, 575 (1997); D. Fattal et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 037904 (2004); I. Marcikic et al., Nature (London) 421, 509 (2003); Y.-H. Kim et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1370 (2001); D. Boschi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1121 (1998); R. Ursinn et al., Nature (London) 430, 849 (2004); J.-W. Pan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4435 (2001). (The average fidelities in these experiments were 0.70, 0.80, 0.81, 0.83, 0.85, 0.87, and 0.89, respectively.)
7. D. Bouwmeester et al., Nature (London) 390, 575 (1997); D. Fattal et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 037904 (2004); I. Marcikic et al., Nature (London) 421, 509 (2003); Y.-H. Kim et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1370 (2001); D. Boschi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1121 (1998); R. Ursinn et al., Nature (London) 430, 849 (2004); J.-W. Pan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4435 (2001). (The average fidelities in these experiments were 0.70, 0.80, 0.81, 0.83, 0.85, 0.87, and 0.89, respectively.)
8. D. Bouwmeester et al., Nature (London) 390, 575 (1997); D. Fattal et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 037904 (2004); I. Marcikic et al., Nature (London) 421, 509 (2003); Y.-H. Kim et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1370 (2001); D. Boschi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1121 (1998); R. Ursinn et al., Nature (London) 430, 849 (2004); J.-W. Pan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4435 (2001). (The average fidelities in these experiments were 0.70, 0.80, 0.81, 0.83, 0.85, 0.87, and 0.89, respectively.)
9. D. Bouwmeester et al., Nature (London) 390, 575 (1997); D. Fattal et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 037904 (2004); I. Marcikic et al., Nature (London) 421, 509 (2003); Y.-H. Kim et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1370 (2001); D. Boschi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1121 (1998); R. Ursinn et al., Nature (London) 430, 849 (2004); J.-W. Pan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4435 (2001). (The average fidelities in these experiments were 0.70, 0.80, 0.81, 0.83, 0.85, 0.87, and 0.89, respectively.)
10. D. Bouwmeester et al., Nature (London) 390, 575 (1997); D. Fattal et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 037904 (2004); I. Marcikic et al., Nature (London) 421, 509 (2003); Y.-H. Kim et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1370 (2001); D. Boschi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1121 (1998); R. Ursinn et al., Nature (London) 430, 849 (2004); J.-W. Pan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4435 (2001). (The average fidelities in these experiments were 0.70, 0.80, 0.81, 0.83, 0.85, 0.87, and 0.89, respectively.)
11. D. Bouwmeester et al., Nature (London) 390, 575 (1997); D. Fattal et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 037904 (2004); I. Marcikic et al., Nature (London) 421, 509 (2003); Y.-H. Kim et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1370 (2001); D. Boschi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1121 (1998); R. Ursinn et al., Nature (London) 430, 849 (2004); J.-W. Pan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4435 (2001). (The average fidelities in these experiments were 0.70, 0.80, 0.81, 0.83, 0.85, 0.87, and 0.89, respectively.)
12. M. Riebe et al., Nature (London) 429, 734 (2004); M. D. Barrett et al., Nature (London) 429, 737 (2004). (The average fidelities in these experiments were 0.75 and 0.78, respectively.)
13. M. Riebe et al., Nature (London) 429, 734 (2004); M. D. Barrett et al., Nature (London) 429, 737 (2004). (The average fidelities in these experiments were 0.75 and 0.78, respectively.)
14. A. Furusawa, S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, H. J. Kimble, and E. S. Polzik, Science 282, 706 (1998). (The average fidelity in this experiment was 0.58.)
15. T. C. Zhang, K. W. Goh, C. W. Chou, P. Lodahl, and K. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. A 67, 033802 (2003). (The average fidelity in this experiment was 0.61.)
16. W. P. Bowen, N. Treps, B. C. Buchler, R. Schnabel, T. C. Ralph, H. A. Bachor, T. Symul, and P. K. Lam, Phys. Rev. A 67, 032302 (2003). (The average fidelity in this experiment was 0.64.)
17. H. Yonezawa, T. Aoki, and A. Furusawa, Nature (London) 431, 430 (2004). (The average fidelity in this experiment was 0.63.)
18. B. Julsgaard, J. Sherson, J. I. Cirac, J. Fiurasek, and E. S. Polzik, Nature (London) 432, 482 (2004).
19. A. Kuzmich et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4782 (1997); A. E. Kozhekin et al., Phys. Rev. A 62, 033809 (2000).
20. A. Kuzmich et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4782 (1997); A. E. Kozhekin et al., Phys. Rev. A 62, 033809 (2000).
21. C. Schori et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 057903 (2002); Special issue, B. Julsgaard et al. [Quantum Inf. Comput., 3, 518 (2003)].
22. C. Schori et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 057903 (2002); Special issue, B. Julsgaard et al. [Quantum Inf. Comput., 3, 518 (2003)].
23. A. Dantan and M. Pinard, Phys. Rev. A 69, 043810 (2004); A. Dantan, A. Bramati, and M. Pinard, Europhys. Lett. 67, 881 (2004).
24. A. Dantan and M. Pinard, Phys. Rev. A 69, 043810 (2004); A. Dantan, A. Bramati, and M. Pinard, Europhys. Lett. 67, 881 (2004).
25. M. Fleischhauer and M. D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5094 (2000); Phys. Rev. A 65, 022314 (2002).
26. M. Fleischhauer and M. D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5094 (2000); Phys. Rev. A 65, 022314 (2002).
27. C. Liu et al., Nature (London) 409, 490 (2001).
28. M. Bajcsy et al., Nature (London) 426, 638 (2003).
29. J. I. Cirac et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3221 (1997).
30. This is a direct consequence of the no-cloning theorem. D. Dieks, Phys. Lett. 92A, 271 (1982); W. K. Wootters and W. H. Zurek, Nature (London) 299, 802 (1982); see also R. F. Werner, "Quantum Information and Quantum Computing," http://www.imaph.tu-bs.de/qi/qi.html (unpublished).
31. This is a direct consequence of the no-cloning theorem. D. Dieks, Phys. Lett. 92A, 271 (1982); W. K. Wootters and W. H. Zurek, Nature (London) 299, 802 (1982); see also R. F. Werner, "Quantum Information and Quantum Computing," http://www.imaph.tu-bs.de/qi/qi.html (unpublished).
32. This is a direct consequence of the no-cloning theorem. D. Dieks, Phys. Lett. 92A, 271 (1982); W. K. Wootters and W. H. Zurek, Nature (London) 299, 802 (1982); see also R. F. Werner, "Quantum Information and Quantum Computing," http://www.imaph.tu-bs.de/qi/qi.html (unpublished).
33. S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 797 (1994).
34. S. Massar and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1259 (1995).
35. R. Derka et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1571 (1998).
36. D. Bruss et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2598 (1998).
37. S. L. Braunstein et al., J. Mod. Opt. 47, 267 (2000). (Note, in particular, the footnote on p. 275.)
38. K. M. R. Audenaert, C. A. Fuchs, C. King, and A. Winter, Quantum Inf. Comput. 4, 1 (2004).
39. In the context of continuous variable teleportation, figure of merits different from the fidelity have been proposed in order to evaluate nonunit gain teleportation. See W. P. Bowen, N. Treps, B. C. Buchler, R. Schnabel, T. C. Ralph, T. Symul, and P. K. Lam, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 9, 1519 (2003).
40. H. P. Yuen and M. Lax, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 19, 740 (1973).
41. A. S. Holevo, Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982).
42. C. W. Helstrom, Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory (Academic, New York, 1976).
43. H. P. Yuen et al., IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 21, 125 (1975).
44. p.
45. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, L. Maccone, J. H. Shapiro, and B. J. Yen, Phys. Rev. A 70, 022328 (2004).
46. N. J. Cerf, O. Krueger, P. Navez, R. F. Werner, and M. M. Wolf, quant-ph/0410058.
47. N. J. Cerf, A. Ipe, and X. Rottenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1754 (2000).
48. F. Grosshans and P. Grangier, Phys. Rev. A 64, 010301 (2001).
49. C. M. Caves and K. Wodkiewicz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 040506 (2004).
50. S. L. Braunstein, Phys. Rev. A 64, 022321 (2001).