Spin degree of freedom in the ν = 1 bilayer electron system investigated by nuclear spin relaxation

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 94, Issue 9, 2005, Pages

  Kumada, N ^a   Muraki, K ^a   Hashimoto, K ^b,c   Hirayama, Y ^a,b  

^a Kashino Diverse Brain Research Laboratory of NTT Communication Science Laboratories   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BILAYERS; ELECTRON SYSTEMS; INTERLAYERS; NUCLEAR SPIN RELAXATION;

CARRIER CONCENTRATION; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); HALL EFFECT; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MONOLAYERS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

ELECTRONS;

EID: 18144403214     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.096802     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. S. Q. Murphy, J. P. Eisenstein, G. S. Boebinger, L.N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 728 (1994).
2. S. M. Girvin and A. H. MacDonald, Perspectives in Quantum Hall Effects, edited by A. Pinczuk and S. Das Sarma (Wiley, New York, 1997).
3. I. B. Spielman, J. P. Eisenstein, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 036803 (2001).
4. A. H. MacDonald, P.M. Platzman, and G. S. Boebinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 775 (1990).
5. M. Kellogg, J. P. Eisenstein, L.N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 246801 (2003).
6. J. Schliemann, S. M. Girvin, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1849 (2001).
7. K. Nomura and D. Yoshioka, Phys. Rev. B 66, 153310 (2002).
8. A. Stern and B. I. Halperin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 106801 (2002).
9. S. H. Simon, E. H. Rezayi, and M. V. Milovanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 046803 (2003).
10. D. N. Sheng, L. Balents, and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 116802 (2003).
11. I. V. Kukushkin, K. von Klitzing, and K. Eberl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3665 (1999).
12. A. E. Dementyev, N.N. Kuzma, P. Khandelwal, S. E. Barrett, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5074 (1999).
13. S. Melinte, N. Freytag, M. Horvatić, C. Berthier, L. P. Lévy, V. Bayot, and M. Shayegan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 354 (2000).
14. K. Hashimoto, K. Muraki, T. Saku, and Y. Hirayama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 176601 (2002).
15. S. Kraus, O. Stern, J.G.S. Lok, W. Dietsche, K. von Klitzing, M. Bichler, D. Schuh, and W. Wegscheider, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 266801 (2002).
16. We confirmed that effects of current during the relaxation procedure are negligible.
17. B. I. Halperin, P. A. Lee, and N. Read, Phys. Rev. B 47, 7312 (1993).
18. A. A. Burkov and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. B 66, 115320 (2002).
19. The data in Fig. 2 were obtained on a different cool down from the data in Fig. 1.
20. The dependence on B is found to be stronger than expected from a simple picture, and is not understood yet.
21. R. Côté et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4825 (1997); R. Tycko et al., Science 268, 1460 (1995).
22. R. Côté et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4825 (1997); R. Tycko et al., Science 268, 1460 (1995).
23. M. Y. Veillette, L. Balents, and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 66, 155401 (2002).
24. Z. F. Ezawa and G. Tsitsishvili, Phys. Rev. B 70, 125304 (2004).
25. I. B. Spielman, L. A. Tracy, J. P. Eisenstein, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. (to be published).