A proposal and challenge for proponents and skeptics of PSI

Journal of Parapsychology

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 157-167

  Kennedy, J E ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18144364681     PISSN: 00223387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BAILAR, J.C. (1997). The promise and problems of meta-analysis. New England Journal of Medicine, 337, 559-561.
2. BEM, D.J., & HONORTON, C. (1994). Does psi exist? Replicable evidence for an anomalous process of information transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 4-18.
3. BRAUD, W.G., & SCHLITZ, M.J. (1991). Consciousness interactions with remote biological systems: Anomalous intentionality effects. Subtle Energies, 2 1-46.
4. BROUGHTON, R.S., & ALEXANDER, C.H. (1997). Autoganzfeld II: An attempted replication of the PRL ganzfeld research. Journal of Parapsychology, 61, 209-226.
5. BROWN, R.H. (1995). On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination. Statistics in Medicine, 14, 1933-1940.
6. EGGER, M., SMITH, G.D., SCHNEIDER, M., & MINDER, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629-634.
7. HONORTON, C. (1983). Response to Hymans's critique of ganzfeld studies. In W.G. Roll, J. Beloff & R.A. White (Eds.), Research in parapsychology 1982 (pp. 23-26). Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.
8. HYMAN, R., & HONORTON, C. (1986). A joint communique: The psi ganzfeld controversy. Journal of Parapsychology, 50, 351-364.
9. LACHIN, J.M. (1981). Introduction to sample size determination and power analysis for clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 2, 93-113.
10. KENNEDY, J.E. (1994). Exploring the limits of science and beyond: Research strategy and status. Journal of Parapsychology, 58, 59-77.
11. KENNEDY, J.E. (1995). Methods for investigating goal-oriented psi. Journal of Parapsychology, 59, 47-62.
12. KENNEDY, J.E. (2003a). Letter to the editor. Journal of Parapsychology, 67, 406-408.
13. KENNEDY, J.E. (2003b). The capricious, actively evasive, unsustainable nature of psi: A summary and hypotheses. Journal of Parapsychology, 67, 53-74.
14. MILTON, J. (1999). Should ganzfeld research continue to be crucial in the search for a replicable psi effect? Part I. Discussion paper and introduction to an electronic-mail discussion. Journal of Parapsychology, 63, 309-333.
15. OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (1989). Report of a workshop on experimental parapsychology. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 83, 317-339.
16. PARKER, A. (2000). A review of the ganzfeld work at Gothenburg University. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 64, 1-15.
17. RADIN, D., & NELSON, R. (2000). Meta-analysis of mind-matter interaction experiments: 1959 to 2000. Unpublished manuscript, Boundary Institute, Los Altos, GA, and Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research, Princeton University.
18. SCHMEIDLER, G.R., & EDGE, H. (1999). Should ganzfeld research continue to be crucial in the search for a replicable psi effect? Part II. Edited ganzfeld debate. Journal of Parapsychology, 63, 335-388.
19. STEINKAMP, F., BOLLER, E., & BOSCH, H. (2002). Experiments examining the possibility of human intention interactions with random number generators: A preliminary meta-analysis [Abstract]. Journal of Parapsychology, 66, 238-239.
20. STORM, L. (2000). Research note: Replicable evidence of psi: A revision of Milton's (1999) meta-analysis of ganzfeld databases. Journal of Parapsychology, 64, 411-416.
21. UTTS, J. (1986). The ganzfeld debate: A statistician's perspective. Journal of Parapsychology, 50, 393-402.
22. WEZELMAN, R., & BIERMAN, D.J. (1997). Process oriented ganzfeld research in Amsterdam: Series IVb, emotionality of target material, series V and series VI: Judging procedure and altered states of consciousness. Proceedings of Presented Papers: The Parapsychological Association 40th Annual Convention, 477-491.