Plant biotechnology, the regulator and the consumer

Journal of Commercial Biotechnology

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 222-227

  Bainbridge, Janet ^a,b,c,d  

^a Advisory Committee on Novel Foods and Processes ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b Advisory Committee on Novel Foods and Processes   (United Kingdom)

^c Scientific Advisory Committee on Genetic Manipulation   (United Kingdom)

^d The British Potato Council   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Complexity of decision making; Consumer views; GM plants; Regulatory systems

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; GENETIC ENGINEERING;

FOOD CROPS; GENETIC MODIFICATION (GM); PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY;

CROPS;

PLANT DNA;

ARTICLE; CONSUMER; DECISION MAKING; GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROP; GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MONITORING; NONHUMAN; PEER REVIEW; PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; PURCHASING; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; TRANSGENIC PLANT; VALIDATION PROCESS;

DECISION MAKING; FARM CROPS; GENETIC ENGINEERING;

EID: 18044389298     PISSN: 14628732     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jcb.3040121     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. GM Science Review first report, July 2003 (URL: http:www.gmsciencedebate.org.uk/panel/default.htm).
2. Dale, P. (2004), 'Public plant breeding: What should be done next?', J. Comm. Biotechnol., Vol. 10(3), pp. 199-208.
3. URL: http://www.21stcenturyscience.org/home/
4. Ewan, S. W. and Putszai, A. (1999), 'Effects of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small intestine', Lancet, Vol. 354, pp. 353-354.
5. Royal Society (1999), Review of Data on Possible Toxicity of GM Potatoes (URL: www.royalsociety.ac.uk/gmplants/).
6. National Council for Women of Great Britain (2003), 'Food in the 21st Century: Deserving of Answers' (URL: http://www.ncwgb.org).
7. Bainbridge, J. (2004), 'Recent developments in the regulatory system in the UK', J. Comm. Biotechnol., Vol. 10(3), pp. 241-247.