Characteristics and educational support needs of underrepresented gifted adolescents

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 413-423

  Stebbins, Molly S ^b   Holliday, Gregory ^b   Stormont, Melissa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18044381502     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.1030     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. American Association of University Women. (1994). Shortchanging girls, shortchanging America: Executive summary. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
2. Basow, S.A., & Rubin, L.R. (1999). Gender influences on adolescent development. In N.G. Johnson, M.C. Roberts, & J. Worell (Eds.), Beyond appearance: A new look at adolescent girls (pp. 25-52). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3. Baum, S. (1990). Gifted but learning disabled: A puzzling paradox. (ERIC EC Digest #E479). Arlington, VA: The ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education.
4. Beirne-Smith, M., Patton, J.R., & Ittenbach, R. (1994). Mental retardation (4th ed.). New York: Merrill.
5. Bireley, M., & Genshaft, J. (1991). Understanding the gifted adolescent: Educational, developmental, and multicultural issues. New York: Teachers College Press.
6. Bracken, B.A., & McCallum, R.S. (1998). Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test. Itasca, IL: The Riverside Publishing Company.
7. Buescher, T.M. (1991). Gifted adolescents. In N. Colangelo and G.A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 382-401). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
8. Butler-Por, N. (1995). Gifted children: Who is at risk for underachievement and why? In M.W. Katzko & F.J. Monks (Eds.), Nurturing talent: Individual needs and social ability (pp. 252-261). The Netherlands: Van Gorcum and Company.
9. Capuzzi, D., & Gross, D.R. (2000). Youth at risk: A prevention resource for counselors, teachers, and parents. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
10. Cohen, L.M., & Frydenberg, E. (1996). Coping for capable kids: Strategies for parents, teachers, and students. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
11. Colangelo, N., & Assouline, S. (1995). Self-concept of gifted students: Patterns by self-concept domain, grade level, and gender. In M.W. Katzko & F.J. Monks (Eds.), Nurturing talent: Individual needs and social ability (pp. 66-74). The Netherlands: Van Gorcum and Company.
12. Coleman, L.J., & Cross, T.L. (2001). Being gifted in school: An introduction to development, guidance, and teaching. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
13. Daniel, M.H. (1997). Intelligence testing: Status and trends. American Psychologist, 52, 1038-1045.
14. Falk, R.F., & Miller, N.B. (1998). The reflexive self: A sociological perspective. Roeper Review, 20, 150-153.
15. Fiedler, E.D. (1999). Gifted children: The promise of potential/the problems of potential. In V.L. Schwean & D.H. Saklofske (Eds.), Handbook of psychosocial characteristics of exceptional children (pp. 401-441). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
16. Figueroa, R.A. (1990). Best practices in the assessment of bilingual children. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology-II (pp. 93-106). Washington, DC: The National Association of School Psychologists.
17. Flicek, M. (1992). Social status of boys with both academic problems and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 20, 353-366.
18. Flicek, M., & Landau, S. (1985). Social status problems of learning disabled and hyperactive/learning disabled boys. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 14, 340-344.
19. Ford, D.Y. (2000). Infusing multicultural content into the curriculum for gifted students. (ERIC EC Digest #E601). Arlington, VA: The ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education.
20. Ford, D.Y., & Harris, J.J. III. (1995). Underachievement among gifted African-American students: Implications for school counselors. School Counselor, 42, 196-203.
21. Ford, D.Y., & Thomas, A. (1997). Underachievement among gifted minority students: Problems and promises. (ERIC EC Digest #E544). Arlington, VA: The ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education.
22. Freeman, J. (1995). Annotation: Recent studies of giftedness in children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 531-547.
23. Frey, D.E. (1991). Psychosocial needs of the gifted adolescent. In M. Bireley & J. Genshaft (Eds.), Understanding the gifted adolescent: Educational, developmental, and multicultural issues (pp. 35-49). New York: Teacher's College Press.
24. Genshaft, J.L., Bireley, M., & Hollinger, C.L. (Eds.). (1995). Serving gifted and talented students: A resource for school personnel. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
25. Gross, M.U.M. (1998). The "me" behind the mask: Intellectually gifted students and the search for identity. Roeper Review, 20, 167-174.
26. Gross, D.R., & Capuzzi, D. (2000). Defining youth at risk. In D. Capuzzi & D.R. Gross (Eds.), Youth at risk: A prevention resource for counselors, teachers, and parents (3rd ed., pp. 3-22). Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
27. Harris, A.M., Reynolds, M.A., & Koegel, H.M. (Eds.). (1996). Nonverbal assessment: Multicultural perspectives. In L.A. Suzuki, P.J. Meller, & J.G. Ponterotto (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural assessment: Clinical, psychological, and educational applications (pp. 223-252). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
28. Holliday, G.A. (2000). Social emotional needs of gifted youth. Unpublished Manuscript.
29. Holliday, G.A., Koller, J.R., & Thomas, C.D. (1999). Post-high school outcomes of high IQ adults with learning disabilities. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22, 266-281.
30. Hollinger, C.L. (1985). The stability of self perceptions of instrumental and expressive traits and social self-esteem among gifted and talented female adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 8, 107-126.
31. Hollinger, C.L., & Fleming, E.S. (1988). Gifted and talented young women: Antecedents and correlates of life satisfaction. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 254-259.
32. Jacobs, J.E., & Eccles, J.S. (2000). Parents, task values, and real-life achievement-related choices. In C. Sansone & J.M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 405-439). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
33. Kerr, B.A. (1985). Smart girls, gifted women: Special guidance concerns. Roeper Review, 8, 30-33.
34. Kerr, B. (1991). Educating gifted girls. In N. Colangelo & G.A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 402-415). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
35. Kerr, B.A. (1994). Smart girls (revised ed.): A new psychology of girls, women and giftedness. Scottsdale, AZ: Gifted Psychology Press.
36. Kerr, B., Colangelo, N., & Gaeth, J. (1988). Gifted adolescents' attitudes toward their giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 245-247.
37. Kirschenbaum, R.J. (1998). Dynamic assessment and its use with underserved gifted and talented populations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 140-147.
38. Klein, A.G., & Zehms, D. (1996). Self-concept and gifted girls: A cross sectional study of intellectually gifted females in grades 3, 5, 8. Roeper Review, 19, 30-34.
39. McIntosh, M., & Greenlaw, M.J. (1990). Fostering the postsecondary aspirations of gifted urban minority students. (ERIC EC Digest #E493). Arlington, VA: The ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education.
40. Mercer, C.D. (1997). Students with learning disabilities (5th ed.). New York: Merrill Publishing Company.
41. Moon, S.M., & Dillon, D.R. (1995). Multiple exceptionalities: A case study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 111-130.
42. Neihart, M. (1998). Preserving the true self of the gifted child. Roeper Review, 20, 187-191.
43. Orenstein, P. (1994). School girls: Young women, self-esteem, and the confidence gap. New York: Doubleday.
44. Pipher, M. (1994). Reviving Ophelia. New York: Ballantine Books.
45. Raven, J.C., Court, J.H., & Raven, J. (1986). Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales (Section 2-Coloured Progressive Matrices) (1986 ed., with U.S.norms). London: Lewis.
46. Renick, M.J., & Harter, S. (1989). Impact of social comparisons on the developing self-perceptions of learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 631-638.
47. Rizza, M.G., & Reis, S.M. (2001). Comparing and contrasting: Stories of competition. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 54-62.
48. Robinson, A., & Clinkenbeard, P.R. (1998). Giftedness: An exceptionality examined. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 117-139.
49. Sternberg, R.J. (1997). The concept of intelligence and its role in lifelong learning and success. American Psychologist, 52, 1030-1037.
50. Stormont, M. (2000). No where to turn: Homeless youth. In D. Capuzzi & D.R. Gross (Eds.), Youth at risk: A prevention resource for counselors, teachers, and parents (3rd ed., pp. 341-361). Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
51. Thomas, A., & Grimes, J. (Eds.). (1995). Best practices in school psychology - III. Washington, DC: The National Association of School Psychologists.
52. Turnbull, A.H., & Turnbull, H.R. (1996). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: A special partnership (3rd ed.). New York: Merrill.
53. VanTassel-Baska, J. (1992). Planning effective curriculum for gifted learners. Denver, CO: Love Publishing Company.
54. VanTassel-Baska, J. (Ed.). (1998). Excellence in educating gifted and talented learners (3rd ed.). Denver, CO: Love Publishing Company.
55. Vespi, L., & Yewchuk, C. (1992). A phenomenological study of the social/emotional characteristics of gifted learning disabled children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1, 55-72.
56. Wilson, M.S. (1995). Best practices in systems influences on children's self-concept. In A.T. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology - III (pp. 359-368). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
57. Wright, P.B., & Leroux, J.A. (1997). The self-concept of gifted adolescents in a congregated program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 83-94.