The relationship between Diaporthe perjuncta and Phomopsis viticola on grapevines

Mycologia

Volumn 91, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1001-1007

  Phillips, Alan J L ^a  

^a Estacao Agronomica Nacional   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Diaporthaceae; Taxonomy; Vitis vinifera

Indexed keywords

FERTILITY; FUNGAL CELL CULTURE; FUNGAL SPORE; FUNGUS; INOCULATION; PHYLOGENY; PORTUGAL; TAXONOMY;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); DIAPORTHE PERJUNCTA; FUNGI; PHOMOPSIS OBLONGA; PHOMOPSIS VITICOLA; VALSACEAE; VITIS; VITIS SP.; VITIS VINIFERA;

EID: 0033385138     PISSN: 00275514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3761631     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ananthapadmanaban D. 1989. South Indian Valsaceae (Diaporthales, Ascomycotina). II. Sydowia 41:20-24.
2. Brayford D. 1990. Variation in Phomopsis isolates from Ulmus species in the British Isles and Italy. Mycol Res 94: 691-697.
3. Dias MRS. 1980. Phomopsis viticola (Sacc.) Sacc., fungo responsavel pela "excoriose" da videira. Proc. I Congresso Portugues de Fitiatria e Fitofarmacologia (11-19 Dez 1980):175-192.
4. Goidànich G. 1937. Notizie su una malattia della vite poco conosciuta. Atti Reale Accad Naz Lincei 26:107-112.
5. Gregory CT. 1913. A rot of grapes caused by Cryptosporella viticola. Phytopathology 3:20-23.
6. Grove WB. 1937. British stem and leaf fungi (Coelomycetes). Vol I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 488 p.
7. Kobayashi T. 1970. Taxonomic studies of the Japanese Diaporthaceae with reference to their life-histories. Bull Gov For Exp Sta 226:1-242.
8. Merrin SJ, Nair NG, Tarran J. 1995. Variation in Phomopsis recorded on grapevine in Australia and its taxonomic and biological implications. Australas Pl Pathol 24:44-56.
9. Munk A. 1957. Danish Pyrenomycetes. A preliminary flora. Dansk Bot Ark 17:1-491.
10. Nitschke T. 1870. Pyrenomycetes germanici. Breslau: Verlag Von Eduard Trewendt. 320 p.
11. Pine TS. 1958. Etiology of the dead-arm disease of grapevines. Phytopathology 48:192-197.
12. Punithalingam E. 1979. Phomopsis viticola. Descriptions of pathogenic fungi and bacteria, No. 635. Kew, Surrey, England: Commonwealth Mycological Institute. 2 p.
13. Reddick D. 1909. Necrosis of the grape vine. Cornell Univ Agric Exp Sta Bull 263:323-343.
14. Rehner SA, Uecker FA. 1994. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer phylogeny and host diversity in the coelomycete Phomopsis. Can J Bot 72:1666-1674.
15. Saccardo PA. 1880. Commentarium mycologicum fungos in primis italicos illustrans. Michelia 2:92.
16. _. 1905. Notae mycologicae. Series V. Ann Mycol 3: 165-171.
17. _. 1915. Notae mycologicae. Ann Mycol 13:115-138.
18. _. 1931. Sylloge Fungorum 25:138.
19. _, Berlese AN. 1885. Miscellanea mycologica. Ser II. Atti 1st Veneto Sci Lett Arti, 6 Ser. III:711-742.
20. Scheper RWA, Scott ES, Whisson DL. 1995. The missing link in Phomopsis cane and leaf spot disease. Austral Grapegrower Winemaker 381:23-25.
21. _, _, _. 1997. Phomopsis cane and leaf spot - discovery of the sexual stage of P. viticola type 1. Austral New Zealand Wine Industr J 12:264-265.
22. Shear CL. 1911. The ascogenous form of the fungus causing dead-arm of the grape. Phytopathology 1:116-119.
23. Smit WA, Knox-Davies PS. 1989. Comparison of Diaporthe phaseolorum isolates from rooibos tea, Aspalathus linearis. Phytophylactica 21:301-306.
24. Sutton BC. 1980. The Coelomycetes. Fungi imperfecti with pycnidia, acervuli, and stromata. Kew, Surrey, England: Commonwealth Mycological Institute. 696 p.
25. Traverso GB. 1906. Flora Italica Cryptogama Pars 1, Fungi, fasc 1. Firenze, Italy: Rocca S. Casciano. 700 p.
26. Wehmeyer LE. 1933. The genus Diaporthe Nitschke and its segregates. Univ Michigan Stud, Sci Ser 9:1-349.
27. Yuan ZQ, Old KM, Dudzinski MJ. 1995. A new species of Diaporthe isolated from stem wounds of Eucalypts in Australia. Mycotaxon 60:507-514.