Peer review of classroom teaching: An interim report

Nurse Education Today

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 444-454

  Costello, John ^b   Pateman, Brian ^b   Pusey, Helen ^b   Longshaw, Keith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EDUCATION; PEER REVIEW; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; UNITED KINGDOM;

ATTITUDE; EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL; FACULTY, NURSING; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

EID: 18044375148     PISSN: 02606917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/nedt.2001.0571     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Andrusyszn M A. Faculty evaluation: a closer look at peer evaluation. Nurse Education Today. 10:1989;410-414.
2. Arreola R A, Aleamoni L M, 1990 Practical decisions in developing and operating a faculty evaluation system, New Directions for Teaching and Learning 43: 37-54.
3. Bell D., Miller R I, Bell D. Faculty evaluation: teaching scholarship and services. Nurse Educator. 9:1984;18-27.
4. Brown B., Ward-Griffin C. The use of peer evaluation in promoting nursing faculty effectiveness: a review of the literature. Nurse Education Today. 14:1992;299-305.
5. Callery P. Training and education: an analysis of quality assurance in teaching and nursing education. Nurse Education Today. 20:2000;373-380.
6. Coulthard M. Advances in spoken discourse analysis. 1992;Routledge, London.
7. De Tornyay R. Evaluating teaching effectiveness. Journal of Nursing Education. 22:1983;177.
8. Field P A, Morse J M 1985 Nursing research: the application of qualitative approaches: Croom Helm, London.
9. Grbich C. Qualitative research in health: an introduction. 1999;Sage, London.
10. Hickey M. Peer review - process of socialisation. Journal of Nursing Education. 25:1986;69-74.
11. Hoe-Harwood C H, Olsen J. Peer evaluation: a component of faculty performance appraisal. Journal of Nursing Education. 27:1988;377-379.
12. Holstein J A, Gubrium J F. Active interviewing. Silverman D., Qualitative research. 1998;113-129 Sage, London.
13. Hulsmeyer B S, Bowling A. Evaluating colleagues' classroom teaching effectiveness. Nurse Educator. 11:1986;19-23.
14. May C. More semi than structured? Some problems with qualitative research methods. Nurse Education Today. 16:1996;189-192.
15. McPhail G. Management of change: an essential skill for nursing in the 1990s. Journal of Nursing Management. 5:1997;199-205.
16. Patterson E. The analysis and application of peer assessment in nurse education, like beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Nurse Education Today. 16:1996;49-55.
17. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 1997 Subject review handbook, October 1998 to September 2000, QAAHE, Bristol.
18. Reilly L., Carlisle K M, Goldsmith M. External review for promotion and tenure in schools of nursing. Nurse Education Today. 16:1996;368-372.
19. Rouseau N., Cote E., Quenville A. Peer evaluation: more questions than answers. Nurse education Today. 14:1981;29-32.
20. Strauss A L, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. 1990;Sage, Newbury Park.
21. The University of Manchester Academic Standards Code of Practice. 1999 Academic quality: teaching and learning support unit. The University of Manchester.
22. Whitman N I. Clinical colleagues as a source of data for faculty evaluation. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 12:1990;644-658.