External review for promotion and tenure in schools of nursing

Nurse Education Today

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 368-372

  Reilly, Lyn ^a   Carlisle, Joan ^a   Mikan, Kathleen ^a   Goldsmith, Melissa ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAREER MOBILITY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EDUCATION; PEER REVIEW; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

CAREER MOBILITY; FACULTY, NURSING; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCHOOLS, NURSING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0030253166     PISSN: 02606917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0260-6917(96)80011-6     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Ceci S J, Peters D P 1982 Peer review: a study of reliability. Change 14 (6): 44-48
2. Cooper W E 1990 Establishing an outside reviewer pool. Academe 76 (3): 72
3. Evangelauf J 1994 A new 'Carnegie Classification' - Academe is 'healthy and expanding', the updated edition shows. Chronicle of Higher Education, 6 April: A17-A26
4. Hiller M, Ritvo R 1991 Commentary. Journal of Allied Health 20 (2):
5. Lieberman M 1986 Peer review and faculty self government: a dissenting view. Newsletter of the National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education and the Professions 14 (3): 1-6. Baruch College, City College of New York
6. Ostmae P 1985 Issues related to promotion and tenure. In: McCloskey J, Grace H Current Issues in Nursing, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific, Boston
7. Weinback R W, Randolph J 1984 Peer review for tenure and promotion in professional schools. Improving College and University Teaching 32 (2): 81-86