Strongly coupled matter field and nonanalytic decay rate of dipole molecules in a waveguide

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 94, Issue 4, 2005, Pages

  Petrosky, T ^a,b   Ting, Chu Ong ^a   Garmon, Sterling ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b INTERNATIONAL SOLVAY INSTITUTES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECAY RATES; DIPOLE MOLECULES; FERMI GOLDEN RULES; FREQUENCY CUTOFF MECHANISMS;

APPROXIMATION THEORY; ELECTRON TRANSITIONS; HAMILTONIANS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; MOLECULES; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; PHOTONS;

WAVEGUIDES;

EID: 18044369287     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.043601     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. E. M. Purcell, Phys. Rev. 69, 681 (1946).
2. D. Kleppner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 233 (1981).
3. K. H. Drexhage, in Progress in Optics, edited by E. Wolf (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974), Vol. 12, p. 165.
4. P. Goy, J. M. Raimond, M. Gross, and S. Haroche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1903 (1983).
5. G. Gabrielse and H. Dehmelt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 67 (1985).
6. R. G. Hulet, E. S. Hilfer, and D. Kleppner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2137 (1985).
7. D.J. Heinzen, J.J. Childs, J.E. Thomas, and M.S. Feld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1320 (1987).
8. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (John Wiley, New York, 1998), 3rd ed.
9. Chu-Ong Ting, Ph.D. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, 2003.
10. K. Friedrichs, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 1, 361 (1948).
11. E. C. G. Sudarshan, Structure of Dynamical Theories, 1962 Brandeis Lectures in Physics (W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1962)
12. The original model discussed by Friedrichs in [10] and in [11] was the case of a discrete spectrum coupled with a continuum. One can consider this model as a one particle sector of bosonic harmonic oscillators coupled with each other through the bilinear interaction.
13. T. Petrosky, Jing-Yee Lee, and J. Levitan, Phys. Lett. A 164, 379 (1992).
14. E. Karpov, T. Petrosky, I. Prigogine, and G.P. Pronko, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 41, 118 (2000).
15. T. Petrosky, G. Ordonez, and I. Prigogine, Phys. Rev. A 68, 022107 (2003).
16. G. Klein, and I. Prigogine, Physica (Utrecht) 19, 74 (1953); 19, 89 (1953); 19, 1053 (1953).
17. G. Klein, and I. Prigogine, Physica (Utrecht) 19, 74 (1953); 19, 89 (1953); 19, 1053 (1953).
18. G. Klein, and I. Prigogine, Physica (Utrecht) 19, 74 (1953); 19, 89 (1953); 19, 1053 (1953).
19. P. Ullersma, Physica (Utrecht) 32, 27 (1966); 32, 56 (1966); 32, 74 (1966); 32, 90 (1966).
20. P. Ullersma, Physica (Utrecht) 32, 27 (1966); 32, 56 (1966); 32, 74 (1966); 32, 90 (1966).
21. P. Ullersma, Physica (Utrecht) 32, 27 (1966); 32, 56 (1966); 32, 74 (1966); 32, 90 (1966).
22. P. Ullersma, Physica (Utrecht) 32, 27 (1966); 32, 56 (1966); 32, 74 (1966); 32, 90 (1966).
23. G. S. Agarwal, in Progress in Optics XI, edited by E. Wolf (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973).
24. A.O. Caldeira and A.J. Leggett, Physica (Amsterdam) 121A, 587 (1983).
25. F. Haake, and R. Reibold, Phys. Rev. A 32, 2462 (1985).
26. B.L. Hu, J.P. Paz, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 45, 2843 (1992).
27. G.W. Ford, J.T. Lewis, and R.E. O'Connell, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 252, 362 (1996).
28. T. Petrosky and V. Barsegov, Phys. Rev. E 65, 046102 (2002).
29. A.K. Likhoded and G.P. Pronko, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 36, 2335 (1997).
30. D.K. Armani, T.J. Kippenberg, S.M. Spillane, and K.J. Vahala, Nature (London) 421, 925 (2003).
31. D. W. Vernooy, V. S. Ilchenko, H. Mabuchi, E. W. Streed, and H.J. Kimble, Opt. Lett. 23, 247 (1998).