Radiation damping in classical systems: The role of nonintegrability

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 221071-2210722

  Petrosky, T ^a,b   Ordonez, G ^a,b   Prigogine, I ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b INTERNATIONAL SOLVAY INSTITUTES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HAMILTONIANS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; PROBABILITY; RESONANCE;

RADIATION DAMPING;

DAMPING;

EID: 0142025210     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.022107     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. G. Ordonez, T. Petrosky, and I. Prigogine, Phys. Rev. A 63, 052106 (2001). We refer to this paper as Q1 throughout the present paper.
2. T. Petrosky, G. Ordonez, and I. Prigogine, Phys. Rev. A 64, 062101 (2001). We refer to this paper as Q2 throughout the present paper.
3. T. Petrosky, G. Ordonez, and I. Prigogine, Phys. Rev. A 62, 042106 (2000).
4. E. Karpov, T. Petrosky, I. Prigogine, and G. Pronko, J. Math. Phys. 41, 118 (2000).
5. T. Petrosky, I. Prigogine, and S. Tasaki, Physica A 173, 175 (1991).
6. I. Prigogine and T. Petrosky, Physica A 147, 461 (1988).
7. L.A. Khalfin, Zh. Éksp. Theor. Fiz. 33, 1371 (1957) [Sov. Phys. JETP 6, 1053 (1958)].
8. L.A. Khalfin, Zh. Éksp. Theor. Fiz. 33, 1371 (1957) [Sov. Phys. JETP 6, 1053 (1958)].
9. E.C.G. Sudarshan and B. Misra, J. Math. Phys. 18, 756 (1977).
10. J. Mehra and K. Milton, Climbing the Mountain. The Scientific Biography of Julian Schwinger (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000).
11. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields, 2nd ed. (Pergamon, London, 1962).
12. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1998).
13. H.A. Lorentz, Arch. Néer. Sci. Exact. Nat. XXV, 363 (1892).
14. M. Abraham, Theorie der Elektrizitat (Teubner, Leipzig, 1905), Vol. II.
15. P.A.M. Dirac, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 167, 148 (1938).
16. H. Spohn, Europhys. Lett. 50, 287 (2000).
17. F. Rohrilich, Phys. Lett. A 283, 276 (2001).
18. We add this important condition in addition to the conditions enumerated in Q1 [see Eq. (Q1.5.11)].
19. In Q2 we have used condition (7), which is a replacement of another condition on the energy uncertainty in our other paper Q1. Since the energy fluctuation that is proportional to hℏ vanishes in the classical case, we rather use Eq. (7) to specify the classical Λ.
20. V. Bargmann, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 14, 187 (1961).
21. I.E. Segal, Ill. J. Math. 6, 500 (1962); Mathematical Problems of Relativistic Physics (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1963).
22. I.E. Segal, Ill. J. Math. 6, 500 (1962); Mathematical Problems of Relativistic Physics (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1963).
23. J.R. Klauder and E.C.G. Sudarshan, Fundamentals of Quantum Optics (Benjamin, New York, 1968).
24. K. Friedrichs, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 1, 361 (1948).
25. N. Nakanishi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 19, 607 (1958).
26. E.C.G. Sudarshan, C.B. Chiu, and V. Gorini, Phys. Rev. D 18, 2914 (1978).
27. A. Böhm and M. Gadella, Dirac Kets, Gamow Vectors and Gelfand Triplets, Springer Lecture Notes on Physics Vol. 348 (Springer, New York, 1989).
28. S. Tasaki, Phys. Rep. 219, 110 (1992).
29. C. Cohen-Tannouji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Atom-Photon Interactions. Basic Processes and Applications (Wiley, New York, 1992).
30. In order to obtain consistent form of distributions in the integrand over k, we have to take the limit Ω → ∞ first, and then take the limit ∈ → 0+ in the continuous spectrum limit.
31. F. Gailoli, E.T. Garcia-Alverez, and J. Guevara, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 36, 2167 (1997).
32. I. Prigogine, Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1962).
33. T. Petrosky and I. Prigogine, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 7, 441 (1996).
34. T. Petrosky and I. Prigogine, Adv. Chem. Phys. 99, 1 (1997).
35. I. Prigogine, C. George, F. Henin, and L. Rosenfeld, Chem. Scr. 4, 5 (1973).
36. I. Prigogine, From Being to Becoming (Freeman, New York, 1980).
37. I. Prigogine, in Fundamental Problems in Elementary Particle Physics, XIV Conseil de Physique Solvay (Interscience, New York, 1968), p. 155.
38. I. Prigogine, F. Henin, and C. George, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 59, 7 (1968).
39. F. Henin, Physica (Amsterdam) 39, 599 (1968).
40. P. Mandel, Physica (Amsterdam) 54, 241 (1971).
41. C. George, F. Henin, F. Mayne, and I. Prigogine, Hadronic J. 7, 520 (1978).
42. T. Petrosky and I. Prigogine, Physica A 175, 146 (1991).
43. T. Petrosky and I. Prigogine, Physica A 147, 439 (1988).
44. G. Compagno, R. Passante, and F. Persico, Atom-Field Interactions and Dressed Atoms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
45. M related to the ultraviolet cutoff frequency, as discussed in Appendix D.
46. All figures presented in this paper have been produced by C. O. Ting.
47. T. Petrosky and I. Prigogine, Can. J. Phys. 68, 670 (1990).
48. M. de Haan, C. George, and F. Mayne, Physica A 92, 584 (1978).
49. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics, 2nd ed. (Pergamon, London, 1962).
50. T. Petrosky and G. Ordonez, in Quantum Limits of the Second Law, edited by D. P. Sheehan, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 643 (AIP, Melville, NY, 2000), p.59.
51. E. Karpov, G. Ordonez, T. Petrosky, and I. Prigogine, Phys. Rev. A 66, 012109 (2002).
52. T. Petrosky and V. Barsegov, Phys. Rev. E 65, 046102 (2002).
53. S. Kim and G. Ordonez, Phys. Rev. E 67, 056117 (2003).