Location cuing and response time distributions in visual attention

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 66, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1293-1302

  Gottlob, Lawrence R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; HUMAN; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY; VISION;

ATTENTION; CUES; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 17944377812     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194999     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. BROWN, S., & HEATHCOTE, A. (2003). QMLE: Fast, robust, and efficient estimation of distribution functions based on quantiles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 485-492.
2. BURBECK, S. L., & LUCE, R. D. (1982). Evidence from auditory simple reaction times for both change and level detectors. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 117-133.
3. CAMERON, E. L., TAI, J. C., & CARRASCO, M. (2002). Covert attention affects the psychometric function of contrast sensitivity. Vision Research, 42, 949-967.
4. CHEAL, M. (1997). Understanding diverse effects of visual attention with the VAP-filters metaphor. Consciousness & Cognition, 6, 348-362.
5. CHEAL, M., & LYON, D. R. (1991). Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 859-880.
6. CHEAL, M., LYON, D. R., & GOTTLOB, L. R. (1994). A framework for understanding the allocation of attention in location-precued discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 699-739.
7. Cox, D. R., & MILLER, H. D. (1965). The theory of stochastic processes. New York: Wiley.
8. ERIKSEN, C. W., & HUFFMAN, J. E. (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 201-204.
9. ERIKSEN, C. W., & ST. JAMES, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225-240.
10. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1993). Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 682-685.
11. GOTTLOB, L. R., CHEAL, M., & LYON, D. R. (1999). Time course of location-cuing effects with a probability manipulation. Journal of General Psychology, 126, 261-270.
12. GOTTLOB, L. R., & MADDEN, D. J. (1998). Time course of allocation of visual attention after equating for sensory differences: An age-related perspective. Psychology & Aging, 13, 138-149.
13. GOTTLOB, L. R., & MADDEN, D. J. (1999). Age similarities in the inertial properties of attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 740-755.
14. HAWKINS, H. L., HILLYARD, S. A., LUCK, S. J., MOULOUA, M., DOWNING, C. J., & WOODWARD, D. P. (1990). Visual attention modulates signal detectability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 802-811.
15. HEATHCOTE, A., BROWN, S., & MEWHORT, D. J. K. (2002). Quantile maximum likelihood estimation of response time distributions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 394-401.
16. HOCKLEY, W. E. (1984). Analysis of response time distributions in the study of cognitive processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 598-615.
17. JOHNSON, D. N., & YANTIS, S. (1995). Allocating visual attention: Tests of a two-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1376-1390.
18. JONIDES, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. [B.] Long & A. [D.] Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 189-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. JONIDES, J. (1983). Further toward a model of the mind's eye's movement. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 247-250.
20. JONIDES, J., & MACK, R. (1984). On the cost and benefit of cost and benefit. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 29-44.
21. KARPIUK, P., JR., LACOUTURE, Y., & MARLEY, A. A. J. (1997). A limited capacity, wave equality, random walk model of absolute identification. In A. A. J. Marley (Ed.), Choice, decision, and measurement: Essays in honor of R. Duncan Luce (pp. 279-299). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. KENDALL, M. G. (1970). Rank correlation methods (4th ed.). London: Griffin.
23. LABERGE, D. (1994). Quantitative models of attention and response processes in shape identification tasks. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38, 198-243.
24. LABERGE, D., & BROWN, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101-124.
25. LAMING, D. R. J. (1968). Information theory of choice reaction times. London: Academic Press.
26. LITTELL, R. C., MILLIKEN, G. A., STROUP, W. W., & WOLFINGER, R. D. (1996). SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
27. LU, Z.-L., & DOSHER, B. A. (2000). Spatial attention: Different mechanisms for central and peripheral temporal precues? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1534-1548.
28. LUCE, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. LYON, D. R. (1990). Large and rapid improvement in form discrimination accuracy following a location precue. Acta Psychologica, 73, 69-72.
30. MARLEY, A. A. J., & COLONIUS, H. (1992). The "horse race" random utility model for choice probabilities and reaction times, and its competing risks interpretation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 36, 1-20.
31. MÜLLER, H. J., & RABBITT, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 315-330.
32. NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1997). An exemplar-based random-walk model of speeded categorization and absolute judgment. In A. A. J. Marley (Ed.), Choice, decision, and measurement: Essays in honor of R. Duncan Luce (pp. 347-365). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. POSNER, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
34. POSNER, M. I., SNYDER, R. R., & DAVIDSON, D. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160-174.
35. POSNER, M. I., WALKER, J. A., FRIEDRICH, F. J., & RAFAL, R. D. (1984). Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 1863-1874.
36. RATCLIFF, R. (1988). Continuous versus discrete information processing: Modeling the accumulation of partial information. Psychological Review, 95, 238-255.
37. RATCLIFF, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510-532.
38. RATCLIFF, R. (2002). A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 278-291.
39. RATCLIFF, R., & MCKOON, G. (1997). A countermodel for implicit priming in perceptual word identification. Psychological Review, 104, 319-343.
40. RATCLIFF, R., & MURDOCK, B. B., JR. (1976). Retrieval processes in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 83, 190-214.
41. RATCLIFF, R., & ROUDER, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347-356.
42. RATCLIFF, R., THAPAR, A., & MCKOON, G. (2001). The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task. Psychology & Aging, 16, 323-341.
43. RATCLIFF, R., & TUERLINCKX, F. (2002). Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 438-481.
44. RATCLIFF, R., VAN ZANDT, T., & MCKOON, G. (1999). Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychological Review, 106, 261-300.
45. REMINGTON, R., & PIERCE, L. (1984). Moving attention: Evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention. Perception & Psycho-physics, 35, 393-399.
46. ROUDER, J. N. (1996). Premature sampling in random walks. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 40, 287-296.
47. SAS INSTITUTE (1989). SAS/STAT user's guide, version 6 (4th ed.). Cary, NC: Author.
48. SCHWARZ, W. (2001). The ex-Wald distribution as a descriptive model of response times. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33, 457-469.
49. SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1997). A network model for multiple choice: Accuracy and response times. In A. A. J. Marley (Ed.), Choice, decision, and measurement: Essays in honor of R. Duncan Luce (pp. 329-346). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. SHIU, L., & PASHLER, H. (1994). Negligible effect of spatial precuing on identification of single digits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1037-1054.
51. SMITH, P. L. (2000). Attention and luminance detection: Effects of cues, masks, and pedestals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1401-1420.
52. SPERLING, G., & WEICHSELGARTNER, E. (1995). Episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention. Psychological Review, 102, 503-532.
53. SPIELER, D. H., BALOTA, D. A., & FAUST, M. E. (2000). Levels of selective attention revealed through analysis of response time distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 506-526.
54. TOWNSEND, J. T. (1976). Serial and within-stage independent parallel model equivalence on the minimum completion time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 14, 219-238.
55. TOWNSEND, J. T., & ASHBY, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. TREISMAN, A., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
57. VAN ZANDT, T. (2002). Analysis of response time distributions. In H. Pashler (Series Ed.) & J. T. Wixted (Vol. Ed.), Stevens' Handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 4. Methodology in experimental psychology (3rd ed., pp. 461-516). New York: Wiley.
58. VAN ZANDT, T., COLONIUS, H., & PROCTOR, R. W. (2000). A comparison of two response time models applied to perceptual matching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 208-256.
59. WRIGHT, R. D., & WARD, L. M. (1998). The control of visual attention. In R. D. Wright (Ed.), Visual attention (pp. 132-186). New York: Oxford University Press.
60. YANTIS, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 676-681.
61. ZABEL, R. W., & ANDERSON, J. J. (1997). A model of the travel time of the migrating juvenile salmon, with an application to Snake River spring Chinook. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 17, 93-100.