Subtraction of in-phase and opposed-phase images in dynamic MR mammography

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 565-575

  Reichenbach, Jürgen R ^a   Hopfe, Jens ^a   Rauscher, Alexander ^a   Wurdinger, Susanne ^a   Kaiser, Werner A ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Fat suppression; In phase; Magnetic resonance imaging; MR mammography; Opposed phase

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; IN PHASE IMAGE SUBTRACTION; MAMMOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPPOSED PHASE IMAGE SUBTRACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 17844410134     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20316     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Heywang SH, Hahn D, Schmidt H, et al. MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986;10:199-204.
2. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology 1989;170:681-686.
3. Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, Hilbertz T, Eiermann W, Permanetter W. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 1989;171:95-103.
4. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 2001;220:13-30.
5. Ercolani P, Valeri G, Amici F. Dynamic MRI of the breast. Eur J Radiol 1998;27:265-271.
6. Bick U. Typical and unusual findings in MR mammography. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2000;172:415-428.
7. Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, et al. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:35-43.
8. Warren RM, Hayes C. Localization of breast lesions shown only on MRI-a review for the UK Study of MRI Screening for Breast Cancer. Advisory Group of MARIBS. Br J Radiol 2000;73:123-132.
9. Kuhl CK. MRI of breast tumors. Eur Radiol 2000;10:46-58.
10. Du W, Du YP, Bick U, et al. Breast MR imaging with high spectral and spatial resolutions: preliminary experience. Radiology 2002;224:577-585.
11. Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD, et al. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced Turbo-FLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 1994;193:777-781.
12. Szumowski J, Coshow WR, Li F, Quinn SF. Phase unwrapping in the three-point Dixon method for fat suppression MR imaging. Radiology 1994;192:555-561.
13. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Wolf HD, Demling M, Kösling S, Höfer H, Spielmann RP. Misleading changes of the signal intensity on opposed-phase MRI after injection of contrast medium. J Comput Assisst Tomogr 1996;20:173-178.
14. Dixon WT. Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 1984;153:189-194.
15. Kaldoudi E, Williams SCR. Fat and water differentiation by nuclear resonance imaging. Concepts Magn Reson 1992;4:53-71.
16. Stack JP, Redmond OM, Codd MB, Dervan PA, Ennis JT. Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles. Radiology 1990;174:491-494.
17. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupin RH. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994;190:485-493.
18. Peller M, Stehling MK, Sittek H, Kessler M, Reiser M. Effects of partial volume and phase shift between fat and water in gradient-echo magnetic resonance-mammography. MAGMA 1996;4:105-113.
19. Teifke A, Hlawatsch A, Beier T, et al. Undetected malignancies of the breast: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 1.0 T. Radiology 2002;224:881-888.
20. Xu W, Cumming I. A region growing algorithm for InSAR phase unwrapping. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing 1999;37:124-134.
21. Rauscher A, Barth M, Reichenbach JR, Stollberger R, Moser E. Automated unwrapping of MR phase images applied to BOLD MR-venography at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:175-180.
22. Perman WH, Heiberg EM, Grunz J, Herrmann VM, Janney CG. A fast SD-imaging technique for performing dynamic Gd-enhanced MRI of breast lesions. Magn Reson Imaging 1994;12:545-551.
23. Yen YF, Han KF, Daniel BL, et al. Dynamic breast MRI with spiral trajectories: 3D versus 2D. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;11:351-359.
24. Vomweg TW, Teifke A, Schreiber WG, Schmidt M, Thelen M. Combination of low and high resolution T1-weighted sequences for improved evaluation of morphologic criteria in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2002;174:1445-1449.
25. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952-962.
26. van den Brink JS, Watanabe Y, Kuhl CK, et al. Implications of SENSE MR in routine clinical practice. Eur J Radiol 2003;46:3-27.
27. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, von Falkenhausen M, et al. Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for high spatial resolution time-of-flight MR angiography of the intracranial arteries at 3.0 T. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2004;176:21-26.
28. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1202-1210.
29. Heidemann RM, Griswold MA, Muller M, et al. Feasibilities and limitations of high field parallel MRI. Radiologe 2004;44:49-55.