Comparison of qualitative and quantitative measurements on unenhanced T1-weighted fat saturation MR images in predicting pancreatic pathology

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 583-589

  Gallix, Benoît P ^a,b   Bret, Patrice M ^a   Atri, Mostafa ^a   Lecesne, Robin ^a   Reinhold, Caroline ^a  

^a MONTREAL GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b HÔPITAL SAINT ELOI   (France)

Author keywords

Comparative study; MR, pulse sequences; Pancreas neoplasms; Pancreas, MR; Pancreatitis

Indexed keywords

AMYLASE;

ACUTE PANCREATITIS; ADULT; AGED; AMPULLITIS; ARTICLE; CHRONIC PANCREATITIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INSULINOMA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE LIPODYSTROPHY; LIVER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METASTASIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS ADENOCARCINOMA; PANCREAS CYST; PANCREAS DISEASE; PANCREAS PSEUDOCYST; PANCREAS TUMOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPLEEN; VATER PAPILLA;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LIVER DISEASES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC DISEASES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 17844372538     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20310     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Freeny PC, Marks WM, Ryan JA, Traverso LW. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: diagnosis and staging with dynamic CT. Radiology 1988;166:125-133.
2. Balthazar EJ, Freeny PC, vanSonnenberg E. Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis. Radiology 1994;193:297-306.
3. Luetmer PH, Stephens DH, Ward EM. Chronic pancreatitis: reassessment with current CT. Radiology 1989;171:353-357.
4. Megibow AJ, Zhou XH, Rotterdam H, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of resectabillty-report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology 1995;195:327-32.
5. Vellet AD, Romano W, Bach DB, Passi RB, Taves DH, Munk PL. Adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic ducts: comparative evaluation with CT and MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1992;183:87-95.
6. McNulty NJ, Francis IR, Platt JF, Cohan RH, Korobkin M, Gebremariam A. Multi-detector row helical CT of the pancreas: effect of contrast-enhanced multiphasic imaging on enhancement of the pancreas, peripancreatic vasculature, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Radiology 2001;220:97-102.
7. Ross BA, Jeffrey RB, Jr., Mindelzun RE. Normal variations in the lateral contour of the head and neck of the pancreas mimicking neoplasm: evaluation with dual-phase helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:799-801.
8. Mitchell DG, Vinitski S, Saponaro S, Tasciyan T, Burk DL, Jr., Rifkin MD. Liver and pancreas: improved spin-echo T1 contrast by shorter echo time and fat suppression at 1.5 T. Radiology 1991; 178:67-71.
9. Tscholakoff D, Hricak H, Thoeni R, Winkler ML, Margulis AR. MR imaging in the diagnosis of pancreatic disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;148:703-709.
10. Steiner E, Stark DD, Hahn PF, et al. Imaging of pancreatic neoplasms: comparison of MR and CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989; 152:487-491.
11. Campeau NG, Johnson CD, Felmlee JP, et al. MR imaging of the abdomen with a phased-array multicoil: prospective clinical evaluation. Radiology 1995;195:769-776.
12. Engelhard K, Hollenbach HP. High-resolution MRI of pancreatic masses with a new circularly polarized body phased-array coil. Eur Radiol 1997;7:643-648.
13. Semelka RC, Kroeker MA, Shoenut JP, Kroeker R, Yaffe CS, Micflikier AB. Pancreatic disease: prospective comparison of CT, ERCP, and 1.5-T MR imaging with dynamic gadolinium enhancement and fat suppression. Radiology 1991;181:785-791.
14. Winston CB, Mitchell DG, Outwater EK, Ehrlich SM. Pancreatic signal intensity on T1-weighted fat saturation MR images: clinical correlation. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5:267-271.
15. Adamek HE, Albert J, Breer H, Weitz M, Schilling D, Riemann JF. Pancreatic cancer detection with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective controlled study. Lancet 2000;356:190-193.
16. Rockette CB, Gur D, Metz CE. The use of continuous and discrete confidence judgements in receiver operating characteristic studies of diagnostic imaging techniques. Invest Radiol 1992;27:169-172.
17. Mitchell DG, Winston CB, Outwater EK, Ehrlich SM. Delineation of pancreas with MR imaging: multiobserver comparison of five pulse sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5:193-199.
18. Gohde SC, Toth J, Krestin GP, Debatin JF. Dynamic contrast-enhanced FMPSPGR of the pancreas: impact on diagnostic performance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:689-696.
19. Johnson PT, Outwater EK. Pancreatic carcinoma versus chronic pancreatitis: dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1999;212:213-218.
20. Lecesne R, Taourel P, Bret PM, Atri M, Reinhold C. Acute pancreatitis: interobserver agreement and correlation of CT and MR cholangiopancreatography with outcome. Radiology 1999;211:727-735.