Acute pancreatitis: Interobserver agreement and correlation of CT and MR cholangiopancreatography with outcome

Radiology

Volumn 211, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 727-735

  Lecesne, Robin ^a   Taourel, Patrice ^a   Bret, Patrice M ^a,b   Atri, Mostafa ^a   Reinhold, Caroline ^a  

^a MONTREAL GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b TORONTO GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Pancreas, CT; Pancreas, MR; Pancreas, necrosis; Pancreatitis

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; IOHEXOL; SCOPOLAMINE BUTYL BROMIDE; SPASMOLYTIC AGENT;

ACUTE PANCREATITIS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREATITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0032967994     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.211.3.r99jn08727     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ranson JHC. Etiological and prognostic factors in human acute pancreatitis: a review. Am J Gastroenterol 1982; 77:633-638.
2. Fernandez-del-Castillo C, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL. Acute pancreatitis. Lancet 1993; 342:475-479.
3. Balthazar E. CT diagnosis and staging of acute pancreatitis. Radiol Clin North Am 1989; 27:19-37.
4. Freeny P. Incremental dynamic bolus computed tomography of acute pancreatitis: state-of-the-art. Int J Pancreatol 1993; 13: 147-158.
5. Bradley EL III. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis: summary of the international symposium on acute pancreatitis. Arch Surg 1993; 128: 586-590.
6. Balthazar E, Robinson D, Megibow A, Ranson J. Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing diagnosis. Radiology 1990; 174:331-336.
7. Balthazar EJ, Freeny PC. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography in acute pancreatitis: is it beneficial or harmful? Gastroenterology 1994; 106:259-262.
8. Warshaw AL, Rattner DW, Fernandez-del-Castillo C. Intravenous contrast does aggravate experimental pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 1994; 107:320-321.
9. Blackstone MO. Contrast medium worsens pancreatitis? Gastroenterology 1994; 107:321-322.
10. Foitzik T, Deomir BG, Schmidt J, et al. Intravenous contrast medium accentuates the severity of acute necrotizing pancreatitis in the rat. Gastroenterology 1994; 106:207-214.
11. Schmidt J, Hotz HJ, Foitzik T, et al. Intravenous contrast medium aggravates the impairment of pancreatic microcirculation in necrotizing pancreatitis in the rat. Ann Surg 1995; 221:257-264.
12. Tsay DG, Niederau C, Schmidt H, et al. Experimental acute pancreatitis: in vitro magnetic resonance characteristics. Invest Radiol 1987; 22:556-561.
13. Piironen A, Kivisaari R, Pitkaranta P, et al. Dynamic high-field MR imaging in experimental porcine acute pancreatitis. Acta Radiol 1995; 36:182-187.
14. Puolakkainen P, Kivisaari L, Sipponen J, Standertskjold-Nordenstam CG, Nuutinen P, Schroder T. Magnetic resonance imaging in detecting acute oedematous and haemorrhagic pancreatitis: an experimental study in pigs. Eur Surg Res 1989; 21: 25-33.
15. Semelka RC, Kroeker MA, Shoenut JP, Kroeker R, Yaffe CS, Micflikier AB. Pancreatic disease: prospective comparison of CT, ERCP and 1.5 T MR imaging with dynamic gadolinium enhancement and fat suppression. Radiology 1991; 181:785-791.
16. Saifuddin A, Ward J, Ridgway J, Chalmers AG. Comparison of MR and CT scanning in severe acute pancreatitis: initial experience. Clin Radiol 1993; 48:111-116.
17. Ward J, Chalmers AG, Guthrie AJ, Larvin M, Robinson PJ. T2-weighted and dynamic enhanced MRI in acute pancreatitis: comparison with contrast enhanced CT. Clin Radiol 1997; 52:109-114.
18. Winston CB, Mitchell DG, Outwater EK, Ehrlich SM. Pancreatic signal intensity on T1-weighted fat saturation MR images: clinical correlation. JMRI 1995; 5:267-271.
19. Semelka RC, Ascher SM. MR imaging of the pancreas. Radiology 1993; 188:593-602.
20. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley, 1981.
21. Kramer MS, Feinstein AR. Clinical biostatistics: the biostatistics of concordance. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981; 29:111-123.
22. Obuchowski NA, Zepp RC. Simple steps for improving multiple reader studies in radiology. AJR 1996; 166:517-521.
23. Balthazar EJ, Freeny PC, vanSonnenberg E. Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis. Radiology 1994; 193:297-306.
24. Boland GW, O'Neill MJ, Gazelle GS, Mayo-Smith WW, Lee MJ, Halperin E. Use of intravenous contrast material in the CT assessment of acute pancreatitis: is it always necessary? (abstr). Radiology 1995; 197(P):244.
25. McMenamin DA, Gates LK. A retrospective analysis of the effect of contrast-enhanced CT on the outcome of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91:1384-1387.
26. Lee MJ, Rattner DW, Legemate DA, et al. Acute complicated pancreatitis: redefining the role of interventional radiology. Radiology 1992; 183:171-174.
27. Johnson DC, Stephens DH, Sarr MG. CT of acute pancreatitis: correlation between lack of contrast enhancement and pancreatic necrosis. AJR 199; 156:93-95.
28. Benziane K, Azais O, Gasquet C. Une nouvelle classification tomodensitometrique des pancreatites aigues. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1992; 16:720-721.
29. White EM, Wittenberg J, Mueller PR, et al. Pancreatic necrosis: CT manifestations. Radiology 1986; 158:343-346.
30. Beger H, Maier W, Block S, Büchler M. How does imaging influence the surgical strategy in acute pancreatitis? In: Malfertheiner P, Ditchuneit H, eds. Diagnostic procedures in pancreatic disease. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1986; 54-60.
31. London NJ, Neoptolemos JP, Lavelle J, Bailey I, James D. Contrast enhanced abdominal computed tomography scanning and prediction of severity of acute pancreatitis: a prospective study. Br J Surg 1989; 76:268-272.
32. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun AN. Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiography. Radiology 1995; 197: 109-115.
33. Bret P, Reinhold C, Taourel P, Guibaud L, Atri M, Barkun AN. Pancreas divisum: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1996; 199:99-103.