Diastereoselective ring expansion of β-lactams toward γ-lactams via N-acyliminium intermediates

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 70, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 3369-3374

  Van Brabandt, Willem ^a   De Kimpe, Norbert ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BROMINE; CARBON; DISSOCIATION; IONS; REACTION KINETICS; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

Γ-LACTAMS; CARBENIUM IONS; DEHYDROBROMINATION; DIASTEREOSELECTIVITY;

STEREOCHEMISTRY;

2 PYRROLIDONE DERIVATIVE; 4 (1 BROMOALKYL) 2 AZETIDIONE; 5 ALKOXY 4,4 DIMETHYL 2 PYRROLIDINONE; 5 ALLYLAMINO 4,4 DIMETHYL 2 PYRROLIDINONE; 5 AZIDO 4,4 DIMETHYL 2 PYRROLIDINONE; 5 CYANO 4,4 DIMETHYL 2 PYRROLIDINONE; 5 HYDROXY 4,4 DIMETHYL 2 PYRROLIDINONE; AZETIDINONE DERIVATIVE; BETA LACTAM; BROMIDE; CARBENIUM; GAMMA LACTAM DERIVATIVE; IMINE; N ACYLIMINIUM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BROMINATION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; DIASTEREOISOMER; RING OPENING; STAUDINGER REACTION; STEREOCHEMISTRY; SYNTHESIS;

EID: 17744394098     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo048158f     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barrett, A. G. M.; Head, J.; Smith, M. L.; Stock, N. S.; White, A. J. P.; Williams, D. J. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 6005-6018.
2. Meyers, A. I.; Snyder, L. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 36-42.
3. (a) Speckamp, W. N.; Moolenaar, M. J. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 3817-3856.
4. (b) Speckamp, W. N.; Hiemstra, H. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 4367-4416.
5. (c) Bienz, S.; Busacca, C.; Meyers, A. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 1905-1907.
6. (d) Meyers, A. I.; Bienz, S.; Hyok-Boong, K.; Wallace, R. H. Helv. Chim. Acta 1996, 79, 1026-1046.
7. Ishibashi, H.; Nakaharu, T.; Nishimura, M.; Nishikawa, A.; Kameoka, C.; Ikeda, M. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 2929-2938.
8. Palomo, P.; Aizpura, J. M.; Ganboa, I.; Oiarbide, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 3223-3235.
9. Singh, G. S. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 7631-7649.
10. De Kimpe, N.; Stanoeva, E.; Verhé, R.; Schamp, N. Synthesis 1988, 587-592.
11. De Kimpe, N.; Verhé, R.; De Buyck, L.; Schamp, N. Can. J. Chem. 1984, 62, 1812-1816.
12. (a) Dejaegher, Y.; Mangelinckx, S.; De Kimpe, N. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2075-2081.
13. (b) Dejaegher, Y.; De Kimpe, N. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 5974-5985.
14. (a) Clark, J. C.; Battle, G. M.; Bridge, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4409-4412.
15. (b) Bryans, J. S.; Chessum, E. A.; Parsons, A. F.; Ghelfi, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4409-4412.
16. Robin, S.; Rousseau, G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 3099-3114.
17. Barrow, K. D.; Spotswood, T. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1965, 37, 3325-3335.
18. Viladomat, F.; Codina, C.; Bastida, J.; Mathee, S.; Campbell, W. Phytochemistry 1995, 40, 961-965.
19. Kam, T.-S.; Choo, Y.-M.; Chen, W.; Yao, J.-X. Phytochemistry 1999, 52, 959-963.
20. Machocho, A.; Chhabra, S. C.; Viladomat, F.; Codina, C.; Bastida, J. Phytochem. 1999, 51, 1185-1191.
21. 17 Also from a steric point of view the influence of the substituent at C5 will be small because the C5-substituent and the C3-proton do not approach each other. Since it was already clear that the trans diastereomer was formed in larger yield than the cis stereoisomer, the yields indicated also that the isomers with a δ-value around 3.3 ppm were the cis isomers, because they were always the minor products in the reaction mixtures (see the mechanism described above).
22. (a) Wade, L. G., Jr. In Organic Chemistry; Folchetti, N., Mullany, R., Challice, J., Eds.; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2003; p 547.
23. (b) Günther, H. In NMR Spectroscopy, 2nd ed.; Basic principles, concepts, and applications in chemistry; John Wiley and Sons: Chichester, UK, 1995; p 71.
24. Lown, J. W.; Majumdar, K. C. Bioorg. Chem. 1977, 6, 453-463.