The Israeli long-term care insurance law: Selected issues in providing home care services to the frail elderly

Health and Social Care in the Community

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 191-200

  Schmid, Hillel ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Community and institutional care; Long term care; Quality of services; Quasi markets; Services in kind

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ECONOMICS; EVALUATION; FRAIL ELDERLY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HOME CARE; HUMAN; ISRAEL; LEGAL ASPECT; LONG TERM CARE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; STANDARD;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION; FRAIL ELDERLY; HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HOME CARE SERVICES; HOME HEALTH AIDES; HUMANS; INSURANCE, LONG-TERM CARE; ISRAEL; LONG-TERM CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 17744390009     PISSN: 09660410     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00548.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Austrian Federal Ministry of Labour Health and Social Affairs (1999) Aging in Austria. Austrian Federal Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs, Vienna.
2. Badelt C., Holzmann-Jenkins A., Matual C. & Osterle A. (1997) Analyze der Auswirkung Des Pflagevorgesystems. Austrian Federal Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs, Vienna.
3. Ben-Zvi B. (1989) The contribution of the Long-Term Care Insurance Law to the welfare of severely dependent elderly. Bitahon Soziali [Social Security] 34, 49-60 (in Hebrew).
4. Ben-Zvi B. (2001) Long-Term Care Insurance Law: Reflections and implications for the future. Bitahon Soziali [Social Security] 60, 31-45 (in Hebrew).
5. Billis D. (1993) Sector blurring and nonprofit centers: The case of the United Kingdom. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 22 (3), 241-257.
6. Brodsky J. & Habib J. (1997) New developments and issues in home care policies. Disability and Rehabilitation 19, 150-154.
7. Brodsky J., Habib J. & Mizrahi I. (2001) Long-term care laws in five developed countries: Austria, Germany, The Netherlands, Japan and Israel. Bitahon Soziali [Social Security] 60, 46-89 (in Hebrew).
8. Brodsky J. & Naon D. (1993) Home care services in Israel: Implications of the expansion of home care following implementation of the community Long-Term Care Insurance Law. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 8, 375-390.
9. Brookdale Institute and Eshel (1998) The Elderly in Israel: Statistical Annual. Jerusalem (in Hebrew).
10. Cantor M.H. & Chichin E.R. (1990) Stress and Strain among Home Care Workers of the Frail Elderly. Brookdale Institute on Aging, Third Age Center. Fordham University, New York.
11. Clarke L. & Estes C.L. (1992) Sociological and economic theories of markets and nonprofits: Evidence from home health organizations. American Journal of Sociology 77 (4), 945-969.
12. Cohen S. (1988) The Long-Term Care Insurance Law: Background, principles and organization toward implementation. Social Security, June (special English edition), 4-22.
13. Coolen J. (1995) Multiple effects of innovation in community care: What can we learn from the Netherlands? In: T. Scharf & C. C. Wenger (Eds) International Perspectives on Community Care for Older People, pp. 125-157. Avebury, Aldershot.
14. Coolen J. & Weekers S. (1998) Long-term care in the Netherlands: Public funding and private provision within a universalistic welfare state. In: C. Glendinning (Ed.) Rights and Realities: Comparing New Developments in Long-Term Care for Older People, pp. 47-66. The Policy Press, Bristol.
15. Davis-Smith J. & Hedley R. (1993) Volunteering and the Contract Culture. Volunteer Center, Berkhamsted.
16. Deakin N. (1996) What does contracting do to users? In: D. Billis & M. Harris (Eds) Voluntary Agencies: Challenges of Organization and Management, pp. 113-129. Macmillan, London.
17. DeKlerk M.M.Y., Huijsman R. & Rotten F.F.H. (1995) New options in long-term care for the elderly; Evaluation results of demonstration projects in the Netherlands. Home Health Care Services Quarterly 15 (2), 19-40.
18. Eustis N.N. & Fischer L.R. (1991) Relationships between home care clients and their workers: Implications for quality of care. Gerontologist 31, 447-456.
19. Evans-Cuellar A. & Wiener J.M. (2000) Can social insurance for long-term care work? The experience of Germany. Health Affairs 19 (3), 8-25.
20. Evers A. (1998) The long-term care program in Germany. Journal of Aging and Social Policy 10 (1), 77-98.
21. Feldman P.H. (1993) Work life improvements for home care workers: Impact and feasibility. Gerontologist 33 (1), 47-54.
22. Feldman P.H., Sapienza A.M. & Kane N.M. (1990) Who Care for Them: Workers in the Home Care Industry. Greenwood Press, London.
23. Glennerster H. (1996) Caring for the Very Old: Public and Private Solutions: Welfare State Programme. Discussion paper 126, The Toyota Centre-STRICERD, London School of Economies and Political Science, London.
24. Glennerster H. & Le Grand J. (1994) The Development of Quasi-Markets in Welfare Provision. Discussion paper 102, The Toyota Centre-STRICERD, London School of Economics and Political Science, London.
25. Glisson C. (1994) The effect of service coordination teams on outcomes for children in state custody. Administration in Social Work 18 (4), 1-23.
26. Goerke L. (1996) Introduction to long-term care insurance in Germany: An economic interpretation. International Social Security Review 49, 25-38.
27. Gronbjerg K.A. (1998) Markets, politics, and charity: Nonprofits in the political economy. In W. W. Powell & E. S. Clemens (Eds) Private Action and the Public Good, pp. 137-150. Yale University Press, New Haven and London.
28. Gross A. (1997) Care for the Elderly in Japan: Recent Developments. Pacific Bridge, Washington, D.C.
29. Hansmann H.B. (1980) The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law Journal 89, 835-899.
30. Hirschman A.O. (1970) Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
31. Hodge G. (1996) Contracting Out Government Services: a Review of International Evidence. Montech, Melbourne.
32. House of Representatives Standing Committee on Family and Community Affairs (1998) What price competition? Report on the competitive tendering of welfare service delivery. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
33. Hoyes L. & Means R. (1991) Implementing the White Paper on Community Care. School for Advanced Urban Studies, Bristol.
34. Ihara K. (2000) Home care in Japan: Introduction of public long-term care insurance. Home Health Care Consultant 7 (3), 29-32.
35. Ikegami N. & Campbell J.C. (1995) Medical care in Japan. New England Journal of Medicine 333, 1295-1299.
36. Keigher S.M. (1997) Austria's new attendance allowance: a consumer choice model of care for the frail and disabled. International Journal of Health Services 27 (4), 753-765.
37. Knapp M., Kendall J. & Forder J. (1999) Is the independent sector important in social care? PSSRU Bulletin 11, 14-17.
38. Knapp H., Robertson E. & Thomason C. (1990) Public Money, Voluntary Action: Whose Welfare?. In H. Anheier & W. Seibel (Eds) The Third Sector, pp. 183-218. DeGruyter, Berlin.
39. Lipsky M. (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
40. Litwin H. & Lightman E. (1996) The development of community care policy for the elderly: a comparative perspective. International Journal of Health Services 26 (4), 691-708.
41. Miltenburg T. & Klie T. (1995) Cash order care? Erfahrungen mit der Zahlung von Pflegegeld in der Niederlanden. Quoted in: Schneider, U. (1999), German's social long-term care insurance: Design, implementation and evaluation. International Social Security Review, 52, 31-74.
42. Miltenburg T. & Klie T. (1995) Cash order care? Erfahrungen mit der Zahlung von Pflegegeld in der Niederlanden. Quoted in: Schneider, U. (1999), German's social long-term care insurance: Design, implementation and evaluation. International Social Security Review, 52, 31-74.
43. Naon D. & Strosberg N. (1995) The Impact of the Community Long-Term Care Insurance Law on Patterns of Institutionalization. Reprint R-107-96. JDC Israel and Brookdale Institute of Gerontology, Jerusalem.
44. Scheil-Adlung X. (1995) Social security for dependent persons in Germany and other countries: Between tradition and innovation. International Social Security Review 48 (1), 19-34.
45. Schmid H. (1993) Home care workers' assessment of differences between nonprofit and for-profit organizations delivering home care services to the Israeli elderly. Home Health Care Services Quarterly 14 (2/3), 127-147.
46. Schmid H. (1998) The Functioning of Organizations Providing Home Care Services to the Frail Elderly. The Paul Baerwald School of Social Work, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem (in Hebrew).
47. Schmid H. (2001) Evaluating the impact of legal change on nonprofit and for-profit organizations. Public Management Review 3 (2), 167-189.
48. Schneider U. (1999) Germany's social long-term care insurance: Design, implementation and evaluation. International Social Security Review 52, 31-74.
49. Seike A. (1998) The Public Insurance System for Long-Term Care and the Development of a Workforce to Supply its Services. Japan Bulletin, 37 (12) [on line]. http://www.gil.go.jp/bulletin/ year/1998/Vol1137-12 (04.html).
50. Stessman J. (2001) The Long-Term Care Insurance Law after twelve years: Problems and solutions. Bitahon Soziali [Social Security] 60, 8-30 (in Hebrew).
51. Zipkin A. & Morginstin B. (1998) Recipients of long-term care insurance benefits in Israel, 1996-97. The National Insurance Institute, Jerusalem, (in Hebrew).