Relating sensory analysis with electronic nose and headspace fingerprint MS for tomato aroma profiling

Postharvest Biology and Technology

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 143-155

  Berna, A Z ^a   Buysens, S ^b   Di Natale, C ^c   Grun I U ^d   Lammertyn, J ^a   Nicolai B M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b Vegetable Research Centre   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Canonical discriminant analysis; Electronic nose; Generalized procrustes analysis; Headspace fingerprint MS; Lycopersicon esculentum Mill; Sensory analysis; Tomatoes

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PROCRUSTES;

EID: 17644375535     PISSN: 09255214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.12.006     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. E.A. Baldwin, M.O. Nisperos-Carriedo, R. Baker, and W. Scott Quantitative analysis of flavour analysis parameters in six Florida tomato cultivars (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) J. Agric. Food. Chem. 39 1991 1135 1140
2. E.A. Baldwin, M.O. Nisperos-Carriedo, and M.G. Moshonas Quantitative analysis of flavor and other volatiles and for certain constituents of two tomato cultivars during ripening J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116 1991 265 269
3. E.A. Baldwin, J.W. Scott, M.A. Einstein, T.M.M. Malundo, B.T. Carr, R.L. Shewfelt, and K.S. Tandon Relationship between sensory and instrumental analysis for tomato flavor J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 125 1998 906 915
4. E. Baldwin, J.W. Scott, C.K. Shewmaker, and W. Schuch Flavor trivia and tomato aroma: biochemistry and possible mechanisms for control of important aroma components HortScience 35 2000 1013 1022
5. A.Z. Berna, J. Lammertyn, S. Saevels, C. Di Natale, and B.M. Nicolaï Electronic nose systems to study shelf life and cultivar effect on tomato aroma profile Sens. Actuators B Chem. 97 2004 324 333
6. F. Boukobza, P. Dunphy, and A. Taylor Measurement of lipid oxidation-derived volatiles in fresh tomatoes Postharvest Biol. Technol. 23 2001 117 131
7. R.G. Buttery, and L.C. Ling Volatile components of tomato fruit and plant parts: relationship and biogenesis R. Teranishi R.G. Buttery H. Sugisawa Biactive Volatile Compounds from Plants 1993 American Chemical Society Washington, DC 23 34
8. R.G. Buttery, R. Teranishi, and L.C. Ling Fresh tomato aroma volatiles: a quantitative study J. Agric. Food. Chem. 35 1987 540 544
9. S. Chung, H. Heymann, and I.U. Grün Application of GPA and PLSR in correlating sensory and chemical data sets Food. Qual. Prefer. 14 2003 485 495
10. G. Dijksterhuis Procrustes analysis in studying sensory-instrumental relations Food. Qual. Prefer. 5 1994 115 120
11. J.E.R. Frijters Some psychophysical notes on the use of the odour unit number D. Land H. Nursten Progress in Flavour Research 1979 47 51
12. J.C. Grower Generalized procrustes analysis Psychometrika 40 1975 33 51
13. ISO, 1988. Sensory analysis. General guidance for the design of test rooms, International Standards Organization (ISO 8589), Switzerland.
14. A. Krumbein, and H. Auerswald Characterization of aroma volatiles in tomato by sensory Nahrung 42 1998 395 399
15. A. Krumbein, P. Peters, and B. Brückner Flavour compounds and a quantitative analysis of tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) of different cultivars in short-term storage Postharvest Biol. Technol. 32 2004 15 28
16. T. Lawless, and H. Heymann Sensory evaluation of food, principles and practices Data Relationships and Multivariate Applications 1998 Chapman and Hall New York pp. 585-601 (Chapter 17)
17. R. Marsili Combining mass spectrometry and multivariate analysis to make a reliable and versatile electronic nose R. Marsili Flavor, Fragance, and Odor Analysis 2002 Rockford Illinois 349 374
18. F. Maul, S.A. Sargent, D.J. Huber, M.O. Balaban, D.A. Luzurriaga, and E.A. Baldwin Non-destructive quality screening of tomato fruit using "electronic nose" technology Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 110 1997 188 194
19. S. Saevels, C. Di Natale, A.Z. Berna, E. Veraverbeke, J. Lammertyn, and B.M. Nicolaï Electronic nose as a non-destructive tool to evaluate the optimal harvest date of apples Postharvest Biol. Technol. 30 2003 3 14
20. S. Saevels, J. Lammertyn, A.Z. Berna, E. Veraverbeke, C. Di Natale, and B. Nicolaï An electronic nose and a mass spectrometric based electronic nose for assessing apple quality during shelf life Postharvest Biol. Technol. 31 2004 9 19
21. J. Song, L. Fan, and R. Beaudry Application of solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry for rapid analysis of flavor volatiles in tomato and strawberry fruits J. Agric. Food. Chem. 46 1998 3721 3726
22. K. Tandon, E. Baldwin, and R. Shewfelt Aroma perception of individual volatile compounds in fresh tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum, Mill.) as affected by the medium of evaluation Postharvest Biol. Technol. 20 2000 261 268
23. U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1975. Color Classification Requirements in Tomatoes, Visual Aid TM-L-1. The John Henry Co., Lansing, MI, USA.