How governments matter to new industry creation

Academy of Management Review

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 321-337

  Spencer, Jennifer W ^a   Murtha, Thomas P ^b,c   Lenway, Stefanie Ann ^b,c  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17544372548     PISSN: 03637425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2005.16387889     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Adams, P. S. 2002. Can neo-corporatism survive the European Union? (And can the EU survive neo-corporatism?) Paper presented at the European Community Studies Association-Canada Fifth Biennial Conference, Toronto.
2. Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. 1999. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 4: 905-917.
3. Basalla, G. 1988. The evolution of technology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Benjamin, R., & Duvall, R. 1985. The capitalist state in context. In R. Benjamin & S. L. Elkin (Eds.), The democratic state: 1-57. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
5. Borzo, J. 2001. Aging gracefully: France's Minitel is hanging on, much to the surprise of its critics. Wall Street Journal, October 15: R22.
6. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 1997. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 1-34.
7. Chandler, A. D. 1962. Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Chesnais, F. 1993. The French national system of innovation. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National innovation systems: A comparative analysis: 192-229. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Clines, F. X. 2002. How do West Virginians spell pork? It's B-Y-R-D. New York Times. May 4: Al.
10. Commons, J. R. 1970. (First published in 1950.) The economics of collective action. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
11. Diamond, J. 1997. Guns, germs and steel: The fates of human societies. New York: Norton.
12. Doz, Y. L., Ring, P. S., Lenway, S. A., & Murtha, T. P. 1998. PixTech, Inc. Case No. 398-140-1. Fontainebleau, France: INSEAD.
13. Doz, Y. L., Santos, J., & Williamson, P. 2001. From global to metanational: How companies win in the knowledge economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
14. Edquist, C., & Lundvall, B. Å. 1993. Comparing the Danish and Swedish systems of innovation. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National innovation systems: A comparative analysis: 265-298
15. Ergas, H. 1987. Does technology policy matter? In B. R. Guile & H. Brooks (Eds.), Technology and global industry: Companies and nations in the world economy: 191-245. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. Florida, R., & Kenney, M. 1990. The breakthrough illusion: Corporate America's failure to move from innovation to mass production. New York: Basic Books.
17. Freeman, J. R. 1989. Democracy and markets: The politics of mixed economies. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
18. Garud, R., & Jain, S. 1996. The embeddedness of technological systems. Advances in Strategic Management, 13: 389-408.
19. Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. 2003. Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy. 32: 277-300.
20. Goldstein, J., & Lenway, S. A. 1989. Interests or institutions: An inquiry into congressional-ITC relations. International Studies Quarterly, 33: 303-328.
21. Gomory, R. 1992. The technology-product relationship: Early and late stages. In N. Rosenberg, R. Landau, & D. C. Mowery (Eds.), Technology and the wealth of nations: 383-394. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
22. Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology. 91: 481-510.
23. Guillen, M. F. 2001. The limits of convergence: Globalization and organizational change in Argentina, South Korea and Spain. Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press.
24. Hart, J. A., Lenway, S. A., & Murtha, T. P. 2000. Technonationalism and cooperation in a globalized industry: The case of flat panel displays. In A. Prakash & J. Hart (Eds.), Coping with globalization: 117-147. London: Routledge.
25. Henderson, R., & Clark, K. B. 1990. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 9-30.
26. Hillman, A., & Keim, G. 1995. International variation in the business-government interface. Academy of Management Review, 20: 193-215.
27. Hillman, A. J., & Hitt, M. 1999. Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Academy ol Management Review, 24: 825-842.
28. Hobbes, T. 1965. (First published in 1651.) The leviathan. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
29. Jepperson, R. L. 2002. Political modernities: Disentangling two underlying dimensions of institutional differentiation. Sociological Theory, 20: 61-85.
30. Katzenstein, P. J. 1985. Small states in world markets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
31. Katzenstein, P. J. 1984. Corporatism and change: Austria, Switzerland, and the politics of industry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
32. Katzenstein, P. J. (Ed.). 1978. Between power and plenty: Foreign economic policies of advanced industrial states. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
33. Knutsen, P. 1997. Corporatist tendencies in the Euro-polity: The EU directive of 22 September 1994, on European works councils. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 18: 289-323.
34. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1996. What firms do: Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 7: 502-518.
35. Krasner, S. D. 1978. Defending the national interest. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. Lenway, S. A., & Murtha, T. P. 1994. The state as strategist in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 25: 513-536.
37. Lindblom, C. E. 1977. Politics and markets: The world's political economic systems. New York: Basic Books.
38. Locke, J. 1980. (First published in 1690.) Second treatise of government. Indianapolis: Hackett.
39. Lodge, G. C. 1990. Comparative business-government relations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
40. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. 1984. The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78: 734-749.
41. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. 1989. Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.
42. Murtha, T. P. 1991. Surviving industrial targeting: State credibility and public policy contingencies in multinational subcontracting. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 7: 117-143.
43. Murtha, T. P. 1993. Credible enticements: Can host governments tailor multinational firms' organizations to suit national objectives? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 20: 171-186.
44. Murtha, T. P., & Lenway, S. A. 1994. Country capabilities and the strategic state: How national political institutions affect multinational corporations' strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 113-129.
45. Murtha, T. P., Lenway, S. A., & Hart, J. A. 2001. Managing new-industry creation: Global knowledge formation and entrepreneurship in high technology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
46. Murtha, T. P., Spencer, J. W., & Lenway, S. A. 1996. Moving targets: National industrial strategies and embedded innovation in the global flat panel display industry. Advances in Strategic Management, 13: 247-281.
47. Nelson, R. R. 1992. What is "commercial" and what is "public" about technology, and what should be? In N. Rosenberg, R. Landau, & D. C. Mowery (Eds.), Technology and the wealth of nations: 57-72. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
48. O'Higgins, E. R. E. 2002. Government and the creation of the Celtic tiger: Can management maintain the momentum? Academy of Management Executive, 16(3): 104-120.
49. Olsen, M. 1971. The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. O'Riain, S. 2000. The flexible developmental state: Globalization, information technology and the Celtic tiger. Politics and Society, 28: 157-193.
51. Pearce, J. L. 2001. Organization and management in the embrace of government. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Pringle, D. 2002. Finnish line: Facing big threat from Microsoft, Nokia places a bet. Wall Street Journal, May 22: Al.
53. Ruttan, V. W. 2001. Technology, growth, and development: An induced innovation perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
54. Shaw, W. 2001. In Helsinki virtual village. Wired, March: 157-164.
55. Skoc̀pol, T. 1979. States and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Spar, D. L. 2001. Ruling the waves: Cycles of discovery, chaos, and wealth from compass to the internet. New York: Harcourt Brace.
57. Spencer, J. W. 2003. Firms' knowledge-sharing strategies in the global innovation system: Empirical evidence from the global flat panel display industry. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 217-233.
58. Spencer, J. W. 2003. Global gatekeeping, representation and network structure: A longitudinal analysis of regional and global knowledge diffusion networks. Journal of International Business Studies, 34: 428-442.
59. Stark, D. 1996. Recombinant property in East European capitalism. American Journal of Sociology. 101: 993-1027.
60. Tagliabue, J. 2001. Online cohabitation: Internet and Minitel; Videotext system in France proves unusually resilient. New York Times, June 2: C1.
61. Teece, D. J. 1986. Transactions cost economics and the multinational enterprise: An assessment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 7: 21-45.
62. Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
63. Thoreau, H. D. 2000. Civil disobedience. In Walden and other writings: 665-695. New York: Modern Library/Random House.
64. Tushman, M., & Rosenkopf, L. 1992. Organizational determinants of technological change: Towards a sociology of technological evolution. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14:311-347.
65. Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. 1975. A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 33: 639-656.
66. Van de Ven, A. H. 1993. A community perspective on the emergence of innovations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 10: 23-51.
67. Van de Ven, A. H., & Garud, R. 1989. A framework for understanding the emergence of new industries. In R. S. Rosenbloom & R. A. Burgelman (Eds.), Research on technological innovation, management and policy, vol. 4: 195-225. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
68. Vernon, R. 1971. Sovereignty at bay: The multinational spread of US enterprises. New York: Basic Books.
69. Vernon, R. 1998. In the hurricane's eye: The troubled prospects of multinational enterprises. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
70. Vogel, D. 1978. Why businessmen distrust their state: The political consciousness of American corporate executives. British Journal of Political Science, 8: 45-78.
71. Weber, M. 1978. Economy and society, vol. 2. Berkeley: University of California Press.
72. Weinberg, A. M. 1967. Reflections on big science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
73. Wired. 1998. IBM to update Minitel. http://www.wired.com/ news/business/0,1367,15439,00.html, October 6. Accessed May 30, 2002.
74. 2 Institute of the University of Texas at Austin, Japan Industry and Management of Technology Program and Semiconductor Services.
75. Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. 1993. Business strategy, technology policy and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 451-478.