Boundedly rational decision emergence - A general perspective and some selective illustrations

Journal of Economic Psychology

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 433-458

  Güth, Werner ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

2340; Cognitive processes; D83; Decision making; Learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 17444441725     PISSN: 01674870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-4870(00)00012-X     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Albers, W., & Albers, G. (1983). On the prominence structure of the decimal system. In R. Scholz, Decision making under uncertainty (pp. 271-287). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
2. Bates, J., Loyall, A. B., & Reilly, W. S. (1997). An architecture for action, emotion, and social behavior. In M.N. Huhns, & M.P. Singh, Readings in agents (pp. 225-231). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
3. Berg I., Dickhaut J., McCabe K. Trust reciprocity and social history. Games and Economic Behavior. 10:1995;122-142.
4. Bolton G., Zwick R. Anonymity versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining. Games and Economic Behavior. 10:1995;95-121.
5. Bush, E., & Mosteller, F. (1955). Stochastic models for learning. New York: Wiley.
6. Edmonds, B. (mimeo). Towards a descriptive model of agent strategy search, centre for policy modelling, faculty of management and business. Manchester Metropolitan University.
7. Fehr E., Kirchsteiger G., Riedl A. Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 108:1993;437-459.
8. Festinger, L. (1957). Theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Roar.
9. Fischer, K., Muller, J. P., & Pischel, M. (1997). A pragmatic BDI-architecture. In M. N. Huhns, M. P. Singh, Readings in agents (pp. 217-224). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
10. Frey B.S. From the price to the crowding effect. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics. 133(22):1997;325-350.
11. Güth W. On ultimatum bargaining - a personal review. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 27:1995;329-344.
12. Güth, W. (1998). On the effects of the pricing rule in auction and fair division games - an experimental study. In D. V. Budescu, I. Erev, & R. Zwick, Games and human behavior - essays in honor of Amnon Rapoport (pp. 237-258). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Chapter 10.
13. Güth, W. (1999). Game playing experiments, Conference Proceedings (pp. 242-262), Symposium on Operation Research 1999. New York: Springer.
14. Güth, W. (2000). How do decisions emerge? Generating ultimatum proposals. In F. Bolle, & M. Carlberg, Advances in behavioral economics - essays in honor of Horst Todt. Physica-Verlag, forthcoming.
15. Güth, W., Ivanova-Stenzel, R., Königstein, M., & Strobel, M. (1999a). Learning to bid - an experimental study of bid function adjustments in auctions and fair division games. Working Paper, Berlin: Humboldt-University.
16. Güth, W., Ivanova-Stenzel, R., Königstein, M., & Strobel, M. (1999b). Auctions and fair division games under different price rules: Individual bid functions, prices and efficiency rates. Working Paper, Berlin: Humboldt-University.
17. Hammerstein, P., & Selten, R. (1994). Game theory and evolutionary biology. In R. J. Aumann, & S. Hart, Handbook of game theory, vol. 2 (pp. 931-993). Amsterdam: Elsevier, Chapter 28.
18. Hoffman E., McCabe K., Shachat K., Smith V.L. Preferences property rights and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior. 7(3):1994;346-380.
19. Holland, J. H., Holyvak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. R. (1986). Induction - processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Huck S., Normann H.-T., Oechssler J. Learning in cournot oligopoly - an experiment. The Economic Journal. 109:1999;C80-C95.
21. Jensen M.C., Murphy K.J. Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy. 98(2):1990;225-264.
22. Kagel, J. (1995). Auctions: A survey of experimental research. In J. Kagel, & A. E. Roth, Handbook of experimental economics (pp. 501-585). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23. Kagel, J., & Roth, A. E. (1995). Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 47(2):1979;263-291.
25. Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the theory of games, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Mikula, G. (1977). Considerations of justice in allocation situations, Berichte aus dem Institut für Psychologie, University of Graz.
27. Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston, The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw Hill.
28. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
29. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality, New York: Freeman.
30. Neisser, U. (1987). Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
31. Newell, A. (1969). Heurestic programming: ill-structured problems. In J. S. Aronofsky, Progress in operations research, vol. 3. New York: Wiley.
32. Payne, J., Bettman, J., Johnson, E. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Canbridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Pruitt D.G. Reward structure and cooperation: The decomposed prisoner's dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 7:1967;21-27.
34. Reed, S. K. (1973). Psychological process in pattern recognition. New York: Academic Press.
35. Roth, A. E. (1995). Bargaining experiments. In J. Kagel, A. E. Roth, Handbook of experimental economics (pp. 253-348). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. Roth A.E., Erev I. Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games and Economic Behavior. 8:1995;164-212.
37. Rubinstein A. Similarity and decision-making under risk is there a utility theory resolution to the Allais-paradox? Journal of Economic Theory. 46:1988;145-153.
38. Sauermann H., Selten R. Ein Oligopolexperiment. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft. 115:1959;427-471.
39. Selten R. Evolution learning and economic behavior. Games and Economic Behavior. 3:1991;3-24.
40. Selten, R., & Buchta, J. (1998). Experimental sealed bid first price auction with directly observed bid functions. In D. V. Budescu, I. Erev, R. Zwick, Games and human behavior - essays in honor of Amnon Rapoport. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41. Selten R., Stöcker R. End behavior in sequences of finite prisoner's dilemma supergames: A learning theory approach. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 7:1986;47-70.
42. Shapiro E.G. Effects of future interaction in reward allocation in dyads: Equity or equality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 31:1975;873-880.
43. Simon, H. (1976). From substantive to procedural rationality. In S. J. Latsis, Method and appraisal in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; reprinted in Models of bounded rationality. Boston, MA: MIT Press, 1982.
44. Tietz, R. (1988). Experimental economics: ways to model bounded rational bargaining behavior, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 314 (pp. 3-10). New York: Springer.
45. Tversky A. Features of similarity. Psychological Review. 84:1977;327-352.
46. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business. 59:1986;251-278.
47. Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgement and choice. Psychological Review, pp. 371-384.
48. van Raaij, F., van Veldhoven, G. M., Wärneryd, K.-E. (1988). Handbook of economic psychology. London: Kluwer.
49. Vega-Redondo F. The evolution of Walrasian behavior. Econometrica. 65(2):1997;375-384.
50. Vickrey W. Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance. 16:1961;8-37.
51. Weibull J. Evolutionary game theory. 1995;MIT-Press, Cambridge, MA.