Enhancing randomized motion planners: Exploring with haptic hints

Autonomous Robots

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 163-174

  Burchan Bayazit O ^a,b   Song, Guang ^a   Amato, Nancy M ^a,c  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; HAPTIC INTERFACES; ITERATIVE METHODS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; MOTION PLANNING; PROBABILISTIC LOGICS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

PROBABILISTIC ROADMAP METHODS; RANDOMIZED MOTION PLANNERS;

MOBILE ROBOTS;

EID: 17444438415     PISSN: 09295593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008981903273     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Amato, N.M., Bayazit, O.B., Dale, L.K., Jones, C.V., and Vallejo, D. 1998a. Choosing good distance metrics and local planners for probabilistic roadmap methods. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. (ICRA), pp. 630-637.
2. Amato, N.M., Bayazit, O.B., Dale, L.K., Jones, C.V., and Vallejo, D. 1998b. OBPRM: An obstacle-based PRM for 3D workspaces. In Proc. Int. Workshop on Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics (WAFR), pp. 155-168.
3. Barraquand, J. and Latombe, J.-C. 1991. Robot motion planning: A distributed representation approach. Int. J. Robot. Res., 10(6):628-649.
4. Choi, H.R. and Lee, S.R. 1996. Force display system for manipulating thin flexible objects. In IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, pp. 507-512.
5. Colgate, J.E., Stanley, M.C., and Brown, J.M. 1995. Issues in the haptic display of tool use. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Intel. Rob. Syst. (IROS), pp. 140-145.
6. Das, H. 1989. PhD thesis, MIT.
7. Everett, S.E. and Dubey, R.V. 1999. Model-based variable position mapping for telerobotic assistance in a cylindrical environment. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. (ICRA), pp. 2197-2202.
8. Fabiani, L., Burdea, G., Langrana, N., and Gomez, D. 1996. Human interface using the Rutgers Master II force feedback interface. In IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, pp. 54-59.
9. Gregory, A., Lin, M.C., Gottschalk, S., and Taylor, R. 1999. A framework for fast and accurate collision detection for haptic interaction. In IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, pp. 38-45.
10. Guo, C., Tarn, T.J., Xi, N., and Bejczy, A.K. 1995. Fusion of human and machine intelligence for telerobotic systems. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. (ICRA), pp. 3110-3115.
11. Hernando M., Gambao, E., Pinto, E., and Barrientos, A. 1999. Collision control in teleoperation by vritual force reflection. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. (ICRA), pp. 565-570.
12. Hsu, D., Kavraki, L., Latombe, J-C., Motwani, R., and Sorkin, S. 1998. On finding narrow passages with probabilistic roadmap planners. In Proc. Int. Workshop on Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics (WAFR).
13. Hwang, Y.K. and Ahuja. N. 1992. Gross motion planning - a survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 24(3):219-291.
14. Hwang, Y.K., Cho, K.R., Lee, S., Park, S.M., and Kang, S. 1997. Human computer cooperation in interactive motion planning. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Adv. Robot. (ICAR), pp. 571-576.
15. Taylor II, R.M., Chen, J., Okimoto, S., Llopis-Artime, N., Chi, V.L., Brooks Jr., F.P., Falvo, M., Paulson, S., Thiansanthaporn, P., Glick, D., Washburn, S., and Superfine, R. 1997. Pearls found on the way to the ideal interface for scanned-probe microscopes. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization, pp. 467-470.
16. Ivanisevic, I. and Lumelsky, V. 1999. Operating in configuration space significantly improves human performance in teleoperation. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. (ICRA).
17. Jägersand, M. 1999. Image based predictive display for telemanipulation. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. (ICRA), vol. 1, pp. 550-556.
18. Kavraki, L., Svestka, R, Latombe, J.C., and Overmars, M. 1996. Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces. IEEE Trans. Robot. Automat., 12(4):566-580.
19. Latombe, J.C. 1991. Robot Motion Planning. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston.
20. Maneewarn, T. and Hannaford, B. 1998. Haptic feedback of kinematic conditioning for telerobotic applications. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Intel. Rob. Syst. (IROS), pp. 1260-1265.
21. Massie, T.H. and Salisbury, J.K. 1994. The PHANToM haptic interface: A device for probing virtual objects. In Int. Mechanical Engineering Exposition and Congress, DSC 55-1, pp. 295-302, Chicago, C.J. Radcliffe (Ed.), ASME.
22. Mirtich, B. 1996. V-Clip: Fast and robust polyhedral collision detection. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 17(3):177-208.
23. Richard, R, Burdea, G., Birebent, G., Gomez, D., Langrana, N., and Coiffet, P. 1996. Effect of frame rate and force feedback on virtual object manipulation. Presence-Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 5(1):95-108.
24. Sensable Technologies, Inc. GHOST Software Developer's Toolkit Programmer's Guide Version 1.21.
25. Sheridan, T.B. 1989. Telerobotics. Automatica, 25(4):487-507.
26. Shomper, Major K.A. 1997. Haptic rendering. Technical report, Virtual Environment, 3D Medical Imaging, and Computer Graphics Laboratory, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. Presented at the AESS Dayton Symposium.
27. Taylor, P.M. and Rankov, S. 1998. A visual/tactual virtual display. In Proceedings of UKACC International Conference on CONTROL.
28. Xavier, P.G. and LaFarge, R.A. 1997. A configuration space toolkit for automated spatial reasoning: Technical results and ldrd project final report. Technical Report SAND97-0366, Sandia National Laboratories.