Experimental force measurements on a bifurcated endoluminal stent graft model: Comparison with theory

Vascular

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 98-106

  Šutalo, Ilija D ^a   Liffman, Kurt ^a,b   Lawrence Brown, Michael M D ^c   Semmens, James B ^c  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bifurcated endograft; Endograft; Endoluminal graft displacement; Zenith stent graft

Indexed keywords

WATER;

ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW; CALCULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FLOW RATE; FORCE; HYDRODYNAMICS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEADY STATE; STENT; TUBE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 17444423230     PISSN: 17085381     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/rsmvasc.13.2.98     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Liffman K, Lawrence-Brown MMD, Semmens JB, et al. Analytical modeling and numerical simulation of forces in an endoluminal graft. J Endovasc Ther 2001;8:358-71.
2. Mohan IV, Harris PL, van Marrewijk CH, et al. Factors and forces influencing stent-graft migration after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther 2002;9:748-55.
3. Lawrence-Brown MMD, Semmens JB, Hartley DE, et al. How is durability related to patient selection and graft design with endoluminal grafting for abdominal aortic aneurysm? In: Greenhalgh RM, editor. Durability of vascular and endovascular surgery. London: WB Saunders; 1999. p. 375-85.
4. Ganong WF. Review of medical physiology. 19th ed. Stamford (CT): Appleton and Lang; 1999.
5. Roberson JA, Crowe CT. Engineering fluid mechanics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company; 1975.