Visual perceptual organization: A microgenetic analysis

Perceptual Organization in Vision: Behavioral and Neural Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 117-153

  Kimchi, Ruth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17444417584     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410608918     Document Type: Chapter

References (89)

1. Badcock, C. J., Whitworth, F. A., Badcock, D. R., & Lovegrove, W. J. (1990). Low-frequency filtering and processing of local-global stimuli. Perception, 19, 617-629.
2. Beller, H. K. (1971). Priming: Effects of advance information on matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87, 176-182.
3. Ben-Av, M. B., & Sagi, D. (1995). Perceptual grouping by similarity and proximity: Experimental results can be predicted by intensity auto-correlations. Vision Research, 35, 853-866.
4. Boer, L. C., & Keuss, P. J. G. (1982). Global precedence as a postperceptual effect: An analysis of speed-accuracy tradeoff functions. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 358-366.
5. Broadbent, D. E. (1977). The hidden preattentive process. American Psychologist, 109-118.
6. Bullier, J., & Nowak, L. G. (1995). Parallel versus serial processing: New vistas on the distributed organization of the visual system. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5, 497-503.
7. Donnelly, N., Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1991). Parallel computations of primitive shape descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 561-570.
8. Driver, J., Davis, G., Russell, C., Turatto, M., & Freeman, E. (2001). Segmentation, attention and phenomenal visual objects. Cognition, 80, 61-95.
9. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G.W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
10. Enns, J. T., & Kingstone, A. (1995). Access to global and local properties in visual search for compound stimuli. Psychological Science, 6, 283-291.
11. Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (1990). Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. Science, 24, 721-723.
12. Everett, B. L., Hochhaus, L., & Brown, J. R. (1985). Letter-naming as a function of intensity, degradation, S-R compatibility, and practice. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 467-470.
13. Ginsburg, A. P. (1986). Spatial filtering and visual form information. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of human perception and performance (pp. 1-41). New York:Wiley.
14. Goldmeier, E. (1972). Similarity in visually perceived forms. Psychological Issues, 8, (1, Whole No. 29). (Original work published 1936)
15. Han, S., Fan, S., Chen, L., & Zhuo, Y. (1997). On the different processing of wholes and parts: A psychophyiological analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 687-698.
16. Han, S., & Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Interactions between perceptual organization based on Gestalt laws and those based on hierarchical processing. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 1287-1298.
17. Han, S., Humphreys, G.W., & Chen, L. (1999). Uniform connectedness and classical Gestalt principles of perceptual grouping. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 661-674.
18. He, Z. J., & Nakayama, K. (1992). Surfaces versus features in visual search. Nature, 359, 231-233.
19. Hoffman, D. D., & Richards, W. A. (1984). Parts of recognition. Cognition, 18, 65-96.
20. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1959). Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex. Journal of Physiology, 148, 574-591.
21. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology, 195, 215-243.
22. Hughes, H. C., Fendrich, R., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. (1990). Global versus local processing in the absence of low spatial frequencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 272-282.
23. Ivry, R., & Robertson, L. C. (1998). The two sides of perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Kellman, P. J., & Shipley, T. F. (1991). A theory of visual interpolation in object perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 141-221.
25. Kimchi, R. (1988). Selective attention to global and local levels in the comparison of hierarchical patterns. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 189-198.
26. Kimchi, R. (1990). Children's perceptual organization of hierarchical patterns. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 133-149.
27. Kimchi, R. (1992). Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 24-38.
28. Kimchi, R. (1994). The role of wholistic/configural properties versus global properties in visual form perception. Perception, 23, 489-504.
29. Kimchi, R. (1998). Uniform connectedness and grouping in the perceptual organization of hierarchical patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1105-1118.
30. Kimchi, R. (2000). The perceptual organization of visual objects: A microgenetic analysis. Vision Research, 40, 1333-1347.
31. Kimchi, R. (in press). Relative dominance of holistic and component properties in the perceptual organization of visual objects. In M. A. Peterson & G. Rhodes (Eds.), Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: Analytic and holistic processes. Oxford University Press.
32. Kimchi, R., & Bloch, B. (1998). Dominance of configural properties in visual form perception. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 135-139.
33. Kimchi, R., & Hadad, B. (2002). Influence of past experience on perceptual grouping. Psychological Science, 13, 41-47.
34. Kimchi, R., & Palmer, S. E. (1982). Form and texture in hierarchically constructed patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 521-535.
35. Kimchi, R., & Palmer, S. E. (1985). Separability and integrality of global and local levels of hierarchical patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 673-688.
36. Kimchi, R., & Razpurker-Apfeld, I. (November, 2001). Perceptual organization and attention. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Orlando, FL.
37. Kimchi, R., & Peled A. (1999). The role of element size in the early organization of hierarchical stimuli. Unpublished manuscript.
38. Kleffner, D. A., & Ramachandran, V. S. (1992). On the perception of shape from shading. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 18-36.
39. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
40. Kohler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright. (Original work published 1929)
41. Kovács, I., & Julesz, B. (1994). Perceptual sensitivity maps within globally defined visual shapes. Nature, 370, 644-646.
42. Kurylo, D. D. (1997). Time course of perceptual grouping. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 142-147.
43. Lamb, M., & Yund, E. W. (1993). The role of spatial frequency in the processing of hierarchically organized structure. Perception and Psychophysics, 54, 773-784.
44. Lamme, V. A., Super, H., & Spekreijse, H. (1998). Feedforward, horizontal, and feedback processing in the visual cortex. Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 8, 529-535.
45. Lasaga, M. I. (1989). Gestalts and their components: Nature of information-precedence. In B. S. S. Ballesteros (Ed.), Object perception: Structure and process (pp. 165-202). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Lee, T. S., & Nguyen, M. (2001). Dynamics of subjective contour formation in the early visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 1907-1911.
47. Mack, A., Tang, B., Tuma, R., Kahn, S., & Rock, I. (1992). Perceptual organization and attention. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 475-501.
48. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
49. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
50. Miller, J. (1981a). Global precedence in attention and decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1161-1174.
51. Miller, J. (1981b). Global precedence: Information availability or use: Reply to Navon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1183-1185.
52. Moore, C. M., & Egeth, H. (1997). Perception without attention: Evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 339-352.
53. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
54. Navon, D. (1991). Testing a queue hypothesis for th eprocessing of global and local information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 173-189.
55. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
56. Palmer, S. E. (1992). Common region: A new principe of perceptual grouping. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 436-447.
57. Palmer, S. E., Neff, J., & Beck, D. (1996). Late influences on perceptual grouping: Amodal completion. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 75-80.
58. Palmer, S. E., & Rock, I. (1994a). Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 29-55.
59. Palmer, S. E., & Rock, I. (1994b). On the nature and order of organizational processing: A reply to Peterson. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 515-519.
60. Paquet, L., & Merikle, P. M. (1988). Global precedence in attended and nonattended objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 89-100.
61. Peterson, M. A. (1994). The proper placement of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 509-514.
62. Peterson, M. A. (1999). What's in a stage name? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 276-286.
63. Peterson, M. A., & Gibson, B. S. (1994). Must shape recognition follow figure-ground organization:An assumption in peril. Psychological Science, 9, 253-259.
64. Pomerantz, J. R., Sager, L. C., & Stoever, R. J. (1977). Perception of wholes and their component parts:Some configural superiority effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 422-435.
65. Rensink, R. A., & Enns, J. T. (1995). Preemption effects in visual search: evidence for low-level grouping. Psychological Review, 102, 101-130.
66. Rock, I. (1986). The description and analysis of object and event perception. In K. R. Boff, & L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 33, pp. 1-71). New York: Wiley.
67. Rock, I., & Brosgole, L. (1964). Grouping based on phenomenal proximity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 531-538.
68. Rock, I., Linnet, C. M., Grant, P., & Mack, A. (1992). Perception without attention: Results of a new method. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 504-534.
69. Rock, I., Nijhawan, R., Plamer, S. E., & Tudor, L. (1992). Grouping based on phenomenal similarity of achromatic color. Perception, 21, 779-789.
70. Sekuler, A. B., & Palmer, S. E. (1992). Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 95-111.
71. Shipley, T. F., & Kellman, P. (1992). Perception of occluded objects and illusory figures: Evidence for an identity hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 106-120.
72. Shulman, G. L., Sullivan, M. A., Gish, K., & Sakoda, W. J. (1986). The role of spatial-frequency channels in the perception of local and global structure. Perception, 15, 259-273.
73. Shulman, G. L., & Wilson, J. (1987). Spatial frequency and selective attention to local and global information. Neuropsychologia, 18, 89-101.
74. Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. V. (1988). Perceptual identification thresholds for 150 fragmented pictures from the Snodgrass and Vanderwart picture set. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 67, 3-36.
75. Spillmann, L. (1999). From elements to perception: Local and global processing in visual neurons. Perception, 28, 1461-1492.
76. Sugita, Y. (1999). Grouping of image fragments in primary visual cortex. Nature, 401, 269-272.
77. Treisman, A. (1986). Properties, parts and objects. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 35, pp. 1-70). New York: Wiley.
78. Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
79. Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141.
80. Trick, L. M., & Enns, J. T. (1997). Clusters precede shapes in perceptual organization. Psychological Science, 8, 124-129.
81. Vecera, S. P., & Farah, M. J. (1997). Is visual image segmentation a bottom-up or an interactive process? Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 1280-1296.
82. Vecera, S. P., & O'Reilly, R. (1998). Figure-ground organization and object recognition processes: An interactive account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 441-462.
83. Vecera, S. P., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2000). Graded effects in hierarchical figure-ground organization: Reply to Peterson (1999). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1221-1231.
84. Ward, L. M. (1982). Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 562-581.
85. Wertheimer, M. (1955). Gestalt theory. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp. 1-16). London: Routhedge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1923)
86. Westheimer, G. (1999). Gestalt theory reconfigured: Max Wertheimer's anticipation of recent developments in visual neuroscience. Perception, 18, 5-15.
87. Wolfe, J. M., Friedman-Hill, S., & Bilsky, A. R. (1994). Parallel processing of part-whole information in visual search tasks. Perception and Psychophysics, 55, 537-550.
88. Zhou, H., Friedman, H. S., & von der Heydt, R. (2000). Coding of border ownership in monkey visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 6594-6611.
89. Zipser, K., Lamme, V. A., & Schiller, P. H. (1996). Contextual modulation in primary visual cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 7376-7389.