The survival of resin modified glass ionomer and stainless steel crown restorations in primary molars, placed in a specialist paediatric dental practice

British Dental Journal

Volumn 198, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 427-431

  Roberts, J F ^a   Attari, N ^a   Sherriff, M ^b  

^a Dept Dental Biomaterial Science ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EUGENOL; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; STAINLESS STEEL; ZINC OXIDE;

CEMENTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTIST; GINGIVA DISEASE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MOLAR TOOTH; ORTHODONTICS; PEDIATRICS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 17444412246     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4812197     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Murray J. Prevalence of dental caries: retrospect and prospect. Dent Update 1998; 25: 374-378.
2. Roberts J F, Sherriff M. The fate and survival of amalgam and preformed crown restorations placed in a paediatric dental practice. Br Dent J 1990; 169: 237-244.
3. Randall R C, Vrijhoef M M A. Efficacy of preformed metal crowns vs. amalgam restorations in primary molars. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131: 337-343.
4. Curzon M E J, Roberts J F, Kennedy D. Kennedy's paediatric operative dentistry. 4th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1996. pp 79-87, 114-127.
5. Black G V. Operative Dentistry. Vol 2 - treatment of caries. Chicago: Medico-Dental Pub. Co, 1936. pp 78-112.
6. Osborne J W, Albino J E. Psychological and medical effects of mercury intake from dental amalgam: a status report from the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1999; 12: 151-156.
7. Peretz B, Ram D. Restorative material for children's teeth: preferences of parents and children. J Dent Child 2002; 69: 243-248.
8. Nelson G V, Osborne J W, Gale E N, Norman R D, Phillips R W. A three year clinical evaluation of composite resin and a high copper amalgam in posterior primary teeth. J Dent Child 1980; 47: 414-418.
9. Oldenburg T R, Vann W F, Dilley D C. Composite restorations for primary molars: results after four years. Pediatr Dent 1987; 9: 136-143.
10. Vann W F, Burkmeier W W, Mahler D B. Assessing composite resin wear in primary molars: four-year clinical findings. J Dent Res 1988; 67: 876-879.
11. Kilpatrick N M. Durability of restorations in primary molars. J Dent 1993; 21: 67-73.
12. Papathanassiou A G, Curzon M E J, Fairpo C G. The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars. Pediatric Dent 1994; 16: 282-288.
13. Wilson A D, Kent B E. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J 1972; 132: 133-135.
14. Mjor I A, Moorhead J E. Selection of restorative materials; reasons for replacement and longevity of restorations in Florida. J Am Coll Dent 1998; 45: 27-33.
15. de Araujo F B, Garcia-Godoy F, Cury J A, Conceicao E N. Fluoride release from fluoride-contaming materials. Operative Dent 1996; 21: 185-190.
16. Mount G J. Clinical placement of modern glass-ionomer cements. Quintessence Int 1993; 2: 99-107.
17. Mount G J. Glass ionomer cements and future research. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 286-292.
18. Combe E C, Burke F J J, Douglas W H. Dental biomaterials. London: Kluwer, Academic Publishers, 1999. pp221-231.
19. Mitra S B, Kedrowski B L. Long-term mechanical properties of glass ionomers. Dent Materials 1994; 10: 78-82.
20. Douglas W H, Lin C P. Strength of the new systems. In Hunt P R. (ed) The next generation (Proceedings of the second International symposium on glass ionomers). Philadelphia: International Symposia in Dentistry, PC, 1994. 209-216.
21. Croll T P, Bar-Zion Y, Segura A, Donly K J. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth; a retrospective evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc 2001; 132: 1110-1116.
22. Hübel S, Mejàre I. Conventional versus resin-modified glass ionomer cement for Class 2 restorations in primary molars. A three year clinical study. Int J Paed Dent 2003; 13: 2-8.
23. Mjor I A, Dahl J E, Moorhead J E. Placement and replacement of restorations in primary teeth. Acta Odontol Scand 2002; 60: 25-28.
24. Donly K J, Segura A, Kanellis M, Erickson R L. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130: 1459-1466.
25. Agresti A. An introduction to categorical data analysis. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Chichester: Wiley-Interscience.
26. Murray P E, About I, Lumley P J, Franquin J C, Remusat M, Smith A J. Cavity remaining thickness and pulpal activity. Am J Dent 2002; 15: 41-46.
27. Fusayama T. Two layers of carious dentine: diagnosis and treatment. Operative Dent 1979; 4: 63-70.
28. Finn S B. Clinical Pedodontics. 2nd ed. London: Saunders, 1962.
29. Shovelton D J. Studies of dentine and pulp in deep caries. Int Dent J 1970; 20: 283-296.
30. Bjorndale L, Larsen T, Thylstrup A. A clinical and microbiological study of deep carious lesions during stepwise excavation using long treatment intervals. Caries Res 1997; 31: 411-417.
31. Mertz-Fairhurst E J, Curtis T W, Ergle J W, Rueggeberg F A, Adair S M. Ultra conservative and cariostatic sealed restorations; results at year ten. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129: 55-66.
32. Kan K C, Messer L B. Variability in cytotoxicity and fluoride release of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1502-1507.
33. Sidhu S K, Sherriff M, Watson T F. The effects of maturity and dehydration shrinkage on resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1495-1501.
34. Ribeiro A P G, Serra M C et al. Effectiveness of surface protection for resin-modified glass-ionomer materials. Quintessence Int 1999; 30: 427-431.
35. Chuang S F, Jin Y T, Wong T Y. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 309-314.
36. Mazzaoui S A, Burrow M F, Tyas M J. Fluoride release from glass ionomer cements and resin composites coated with a dentin adhesive. Dent Materials 2000; 16: 166-171.