Sex-differences in nest defence in Fieldfares Turdus pilaris in relation to their size and physical condition

Ibis

Volumn 147, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 375-380

  Hogstad, Olav ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; BODY CONDITION; BODY SIZE; HATCHING; NEST GUARDING; PASSERINE; SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCE;

ACCIPITRINAE; AVES; BETULA PUBESCENS SUBSP. TORTUOSA; CORVIDAE; GALLUS GALLUS; RAPTORES; TURDUS PILARIS;

EID: 17444411947     PISSN: 00191019     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919x.2005.00416.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Amat, J.A., Carrascal, L.M. & Moreno, J. 1996. Nest defence by Chinstrap Penguins Pygoscelis antarctica in relation to offspring number and age. J. Avian Biol. 27: 177-179.
2. Andersson, M., Wiklund, C.G. & Rundgren, H. 1980. Parental defence of offspring: a model and an example. Anim. Behav. 28: 536-542.
3. Barash, D.P. 1975. Evolutionary aspects of parental behavior: distraction behavior of the Alpine Accentor. Wilson Bull. 87: 367-373.
4. Carlisle, T.R. 1985. Parental response to brood size in a cichlid fish. Anim. Behav. 33: 234-238.
5. Chastel, O. & Kersten, M. 2002. Brood size and body condition in the House Sparrow Passer domesticus: the influence of brooding behaviour. Ibis 144: 284-292.
6. Curio, E. & Regelmann, K. 1985. The behaviour dynamics of Great Tits (Parus major) approaching a predator. Z Tierpsychol. 69: 3-18.
7. Curio, E., Regelmann, K. & Zimmerman, U. 1984. The defence of first and second broods by Great Tit (Parus major) parents: a test of predictive sociobiology. Z Tierpsychol. 66: 100-127.
8. Dawkins, R. & Carlisle, T.R. 1976. Parental investment, mate desertion and a fallacy. Nature 262: 131-132.
9. Freed, L.A. 1981. Loss of mass in breeding wrens: stress or adaptation? Ecology 62: 1179-1186.
10. Greig-Smith, P.W. 1980. Parental investment in nest defence by Stonechats (Saxicola torquata). Anim. Behav. 29: 604-619.
11. Haftorn, S. 1971. Norges Fugler. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
12. Hobson, K.A., Bouchart, M.L. & Sealy, S.G. 1988. Responses of naïve Yellow Warblers to a novel nest predator. Anim. Behav. 36: 1823-1830.
13. Hogstad, O. 1983. Is nest predation really selecting for colonial breeding among Fieldfares Turdus pilaris? Ibis 125: 366-369.
14. Hogstad, O. 1991. Nest defence in Fieldfares Turdus pilaris towards a human intruder. Fauna norv. Series C, Cinclus 14: 83-87.
15. Hogstad, O. 1993. Nest defence and physical condition in Fieldfare Turdus pilaris. J. Ornithol. 134: 25-33.
16. Hogstad, O. 1995. Do avian and mammalian nest predators select for different nest dispersion patterns of Fieldfares Turdus pilaris? A 15-year study. Ibis 137: 484-489.
17. Jones, G. 1987. Parent-offspring resource allocation in Swallows during nestling rearing: an experimental study. Ardea 75: 145-168.
18. Knight, R.L. & Temple, S.A. 1986. Methodological problems in studies of avian nest defence. Anim. Behav. 34: 561-566.
19. Martin, T.E. 1987. Food as a limit on breeding birds: a life-history perspective. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 453-487.
20. McLean, I.G., Smith, J.N.M. & Stewart, K.G. 1986. Mobbing behaviour, nest exposure, and breeding success in the American Robin. Behaviour 96: 171-186.
21. Meilvang, D., Moksnes, A. & Røskaft, E. 1997. Nest predation, nesting characteristics and nest defence behaviour of Fieldfares and Redwings. J. Avian Biol. 28: 331-337.
22. Montgomerie, R.D. & Weatherhead, P.J. 1988. Risk and rewards of nest defence by parent birds. Quart. Rev. Biol. 63: 167-187.
23. Moreno, J. 1989. Strategies of mass change in breeding birds. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 37: 297-310.
24. Neudorf, D.L. & Sealy, S.G. 1992. Reactions of four passerine species to threats of predation and Cowbird parasitism: enemy recognition or general response? Behaviour 123: 84-105.
25. Newton, I. 1986. The Sparrowhawk. Calton: Poyser.
26. Olendorf, R. & Robinson, S.K. 2000. Effectiveness of nest defence in the Acadian Flycatcher Empidonax virescens. Ibis 142: 365-371.
27. Onnebrink, H. & Curio, E. 1991. Brood defense and age of young: a test of the Vulnerability Hypothesis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29: 61-68.
28. Redondo, T. 1989. Avian nest defence: theoretical models and evidence. Behaviour 111: 161-195.
29. Redondo, T. & Carranza, J. 1989. Offspring reproductive value and nest defense in the magpie (Pica pica). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25: 369-378.
30. Regslmann, K. & Curio, E. 1986. Why do Great Tit (Parus major) males defend their brood more than females do? Anim. Behav. 34: 1206-1214.
31. Ricklefs, R.E. & Hussell, D.J.T. 1984. Changes in adult mass associated with the nesting cycle in the European Starling. Omis Scand. 15: 155-161.
32. Rytkönen, S., Orell, M. & Koivula, K. 1993. Sex-role reversal in Willow Tit nest defense. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33: 275-282.
33. Sanz, J.J. & Moreno, J. 1995. Mass loss in brooding female Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca: no evidence for reproductive stress. J. Avian. Biol 26: 313-320.
34. Slagsvold, T. 1984. The mobbing behaviour of the Hooded Crow Corvus corone cornix: antipredator defence or self-advertisement? Fauna norv. Series C, Cinclus 7: 127-131.
35. Slagsvold, T. & Dale, S. 1996. Disappearance of female Pied Flycatchers in relation to breeding stage and experimentally induced molt. Ecology 77: 461-471.
36. Trivers, R.L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B.G. (ed.) Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1971: 137-179. London: Heinemann.
37. Weatherhead, P.J. 1979. Ecological correlates of monogamy in tundra-breeding Savannah Sparrows. Auk 96: 391-401.
38. Weatherhead, P.J. 1989. Nest defence by Song Sparrows: methodological and life history considerations. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25: 129-136.
39. Wiklund, C.G. 1982. Fieldfare (Turdus pilaris) breeding success in relation to colony size, nest position and association with Merlins (Falco columbarius). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11: 165-172.
40. Wiklund, C.G. 1990. Offspring protection by Merlin Falco columbarius females; the importance of brood size and expected offspring survival for defence of young. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26: 217-223.