Nest predation, nesting characteristics and nest defence behaviour of Fieldfares and Redwings

Journal of Avian Biology

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 331-337

  Meilvang, D ^a   Moksnes, A ^a   Roskaft E ^a,b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR NATURE RESEARCH   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FIELDFARE; NEST DEFENCE; NEST PREDATION; REDWING;

AVES; CORVUS CORONE; TURDIS ILIACUS; TURDUA PILARIS; TURDUS ILIACUS; TURDUS PILARIS;

EID: 0030668041     PISSN: 09088857     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3676947     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Altman, D. G. 1991. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. - Chapman and Hall, London.
2. Andersson, M. and Wiklund, C. G. 1978. Clumping versus spacing out: experiments on nest predation in Fieldfares Turdus pilaris. - Anim. Behav. 26: 1207-1212.
3. _ , Wiklund, C. G. and Rundgren, H. 1980. Parental defence of offspring: a model and an example. - Anim. Behav. 28: 536-542.
4. Barash, D. P. 1975. Evolutionary aspects of parental behaviour: distraction behaviour of the Alpine Accentor. -Wilson Bull. 87: 367-373.
5. Best, L. and Stauffer, D. F. 1980. Factors affecting nesting success in riparian bird communities. - Condor 82: 149-158.
6. Bezzel, E. 1975. Die Wirksamkeit der Kotattacken von Wacholderdrosseln Turdus pilaris auf Greifvögel. - J. Orn. 116: 488-489.
7. Bjerke, T., Espmark, Y. and Fonstad, T. 1985. Nest defence and parental investment in the Redwing Turdus iliacus. -Omis Scand. 16: 14-19.
8. Blancher, P. J. and Robertson, R. J. 1982. Kingbird aggression: does it deter predation? - Anim. Behav. 30: 929-930.
9. Breitwisch, R. 1988. Sex differences in defence of eggs and nestlings by the Northern Mockingbird Mimus polyglottos. - Anim. Behav. 36: 62-72.
10. Clark, A. B. and Wilson, D. S. 1981. Avian breeding adaptations: hatching asynchrony, brood reduction and nest failure. - Q. Rev. Biol. 56: 253-277.
11. Curio, E. 1975. The functional organisation of antipredator behaviour in the Pied Flycatcher: a study of avian visual perception. - Anim. Behav. 23: 1-115.
12. -, Regelmann, K. and Zimmermann, U. 1984. The defence of first and second broods by Great Tit Parus major parents: a test of predictive sociobiology. - Z. Tierpsychol. 66: 101-127.
13. Edmunds, M. 1974. Defence in Animals: A Survey of Antipredator Defences. - Longman, Harlow.
14. Furrer, R. F. 1975. Häufigkeit und Wirksamkeit des Angriffsverhaltens bei der Wacholderdrossel Turdus pilaris. - Orn. Beob. 72: 1-8.
15. Götmark, F., Blomqvist, D., Johansson, O. C. and Bergkvist, J. 1995. Nest site selection: A trade-off between concealment and view of the surroundings? - J. Avian Biol. 26: 305-312.
16. Greig-Smith, P. W. 1980. Parental investment in nest defence by Stonechats Saxicola torquata. - Anim. Behav. 28: 604-619.
17. Haartman, L. von 1957. Adaptations in hole-nesting birds. -Evolution 11: 339-347.
18. Haas, V. 1985. Colonial and single breeding in Fieldfares Turdus pilaris L.: a comparison of nesting success in early and late broods. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 16: 119-124.
19. Haftorn, S. 1971. Norges Fugler. - Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.
20. Hatchwell, B. J., Chamberlain, D. E. and Perrins, C. M. 1996. The reproductive success of Blackbirds Turdus merula in relation to habitat structure and choice of nest site. - Ibis 138: 256-262.
21. Hays, H. and LeCroy, M. 1971. Field criteria for determining incubation stage in eggs of the Common Tern. - Wilson Bull. 83: 425-429.
22. Hobson, K. A., Bouchart, M. L. and Sealy, S. G. 1988. Responses of naive Yellow Warblers to a novel nest predator. - Anim. Behav. 36: 1823-1830.
23. Hogstad, O. 1991. Nest defence in Fieldfares Turdus pilaris towards a human intruder. - Fauna norv., Ser. C, Cinclus 14: 83-87.
24. _ 1995. Do avian and mammalian nest predators select for different nest dispersion patterns of Fieldfares Turdus pilaris? A 15-year study. - Ibis 137: 484-489.
25. Hoi, H. and Winkler, H. 1988. Feinddruck auf Schilfbrüter: Eine experimentelle Untersuchung. - J. Orn. 129: 439-447.
26. Hoogland, J. L. and Sherman, P. V. 1976. Advantages and disadvantages of Bank Swallow Riparia riparia coloniality. - Ecol. Monogr. 46: 33-58.
27. Knight, R. L. and Temple, S. A. 1986a. Nest defence in the American Goldfinch. - Anim. Behav. 34: 887-897.
28. _ and Temple, S. A. 1986b. Why does intensity of avian nest defense increase during the nesting cycle? - Auk 103: 318-327.
29. Martin, T. E. 1993a. Nest predation among vegetation layers and habitats: revising the dogmas. - Am. Nat. 141: 897-913.
30. _ 1993b. Nest predation and nest sites. New perspectives on old patterns. - Bioscience 43: 523-532.
31. _ 1994. Effects of nest predation and microclimate on nesting habitat selection of coexisting species. - J. Orn. 135: 484-485.
32. _ and Roper, J. J. 1988. Nest predation and nest site selection of a western population of the Hermit Thrush. -Condor 90: 51-57.
33. McLean, I. G., Smith, J. N. M. and Stewart, K. G. 1986. Mobbing behaviour, nest exposure, and breeding success in the American Robin. - Behaviour 96: 171-186.
34. Mester, H. 1976. Defensive Defäkation in der Vogelwelt. -Orn. Beob. 73: 99-108.
35. Moksnes, A., Røskaft, E., Braa, A. T., Korsnes, L., Lampe, H. M. and Pedersen, H. C. 1990. Behavioural responses of potential hosts towards artificial Cuckoo eggs and dummies. - Behaviour 116: 64-89.
36. Montgomerie, R. D. and Weatherhead, P. J. 1988. Risks and rewards of nest defence by parent birds. - Q. Rev. Biol. 63: 167-187.
37. Møller, A. P. 1990. Nest predation selects for small nest size in the Blackbird. - Oikos 57: 237-240.
38. Nice, M. M. 1957. Nesting success in altricial birds. - Auk 74: 305-321.
39. Nilsson, S. G. 1984. The evolution of nest-site selection among hole-nesting birds: the importance of nest predation and competition. - Ornis Scand. 15: 167-175.
40. _ 1986. Evolution of hole nesting in birds: on balancing selection pressures. Auk 103: 432-435.
41. Patterson, T. L., Petrinovich, L. and James, D. K. 1980. Reproductive value and appropriateness of response to predators by White-crowned Sparrows. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 7: 227-231.
42. Perrins, C. M. and Birkhead, T. R. 1983. Avian Ecology. Chapman and Hall, New York.
43. Picman, J., Milks, M. L. and Leptich, M. 1993. Patterns of predation on passerine nests in marshes: Effects of water depth and distance from edge. - Auk 110: 89-94.
44. Redondo, T. 1989. Avian nest defence: theoretical models and evidence. - Behaviour 111: 161-195.
45. Regelmann, K. and Curio, E. 1983. Determinants of brood defence in the Great Tit Parus major L. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 13: 131-145.
46. _ and Curio, E. 1986. Why do Great Tit Parus major males defend their brood more than females do? - Anim. Behav. 34: 1206-1214.
47. Ricklefs, R. E. 1969. An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. - Smithsonian Contrib. Zool. 9: 1-48.
48. Röell, A. and Bossema, I. 1982. A comparison of nest defence by Jackdaws, Rooks, Magpies and Crows. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11: 1-6.
49. Shields, W. M. 1984. Barn Swallow mobbing: self-defence, collateral kin defence, group defence, or parental care? -Anim. Behav. 32: 132-148.
50. Siegel-Causey, D. and Kharitonov, S. P. 1990. The evolution of coloniality. - Curr. Ornithol. 7: 285-330.
51. Slagsvold, T. 1980. Egg predation in woodland in relation to the presence and density of breeding Fieldfares Turdus piloris. - Ornis Scand. 11: 92-98.
52. Wallin, K. 1987. Defence as parental care in Tawny Owls Strix aluco. - Behaviour 102: 213-23.
53. Wiklund, C. G. 1990. Offspring protection by Merlin Falco columbarius females; the importance of brood size and expected offspring survival for defence of young. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26: 217-223.
54. _ and Andersson, M. 1980. Nest predation selects for colonial breeding among Fieldfares Turdus pilaris. - Ibis 122: 363-366.
55. Wilkinson, G. S. and English-Loeb, G..M. 1982. Predation and coloniality in Cliff Swallows Petrochelidon pyrrhonota. - Auk 99: 459-467.