A stereological analysis of fibrosis and inflammatory reaction induced by four different synthetic slings

BJU International

Volumn 95, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 833-837

  Thiel, Marcelo ^a,b   Rodrigues Palma, Paulo C ^a   Riccetto, Cássio L Z ^a   Dambros, Miriam ^a   Netto Jr , Nelson R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Fibrosis; Materials; Sling; Stress urinary incontinence

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; COLLAGEN FIBER; EOSIN; HEMATOXYLIN; POLYCAPROLACTONE; POLYPROPYLENE; SILICONE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FIBROSIS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IMPLANT; INFLAMMATION; MATERIALS TESTING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SMALL INTESTINE MUCOSA; STEREOMETRY; STRESS INCONTINENCE; SUBURETHRA SLING; URINE INCONTINENCE;

ANIMALS; BIOPROSTHESIS; COLLAGEN; FIBROSIS; INFLAMMATION; LACTIC ACID; POLYESTERS; POLYMERS; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; SILICONES; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS;

EID: 17444392804     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05411.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Cardozo L, Bidmead J. Sling techniques in the treatment of genuine stress incontinence. BJOG 2000; 107: 147-56
2. Morgan TO Jr, Westeney L, McGuire EJ. Pubovaginal sling: 4-year outcome analysis and quality of life assessment. J Urol 2000; 163: 1845-8
3. Delesse M. Procédé mécanique pour déterminer la composition des roches. Ann Mines 1848; 13: 379-88
4. Hally A. A counting method for measuring the Volumes of tissue components in microscopical sections. Quart J Microsc Sci 1964; 105: 503-17
5. Petros PE, Ulmsten U. An integral theory of female urinary incontinence. Acta Scand Obstet Gynecol Suppl 1990; 153: 7-31
6. Cardozo L, Bidmead J. Sling techniques in the treatment of genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 107: 147-56
7. Choe JM, Kothandapani R, James L, Bowling D. Autologous, cadaveric, and synthetic materials used in sling surgery: comparative biomechanical analysis. Urology 2001; 58: 482-6
8. Bemelmans BL, Chapple CR. Are slings now the gold standard treatment for the management of female urinary stress incontinence and if so which technique? Curr Opin Urol 2003; 13: 301-7
9. Debodinance P, Cosson M, Burlet G. Tolerance of synthetic tissues in touch with vaginal scars: review to the point of 287 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999; 87: 23-30
10. Persson J, Iosif C, Wolner-Hanssen P. Risk factors for rejection of synthetic suburethral slings for stress urinary incontinences case-control study. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 629-34
11. McGuire EJ, Lytton B. Experience with pubovaginal slings for urinary incontinence at the University of Michigan. J Urol 1987; 138: 525-6
12. Palma P, Dambros M, Riccetto C, Herrmann V, Netto NR. Pubovaginal sling using the porcine small intestine submucosa for stress urinary incontinence. Braz J Urol 2001; 27: 483-8
13. Rutner AB, Levine SR, Schmaelzle JF. Processed porcine small intestine submucosa as a graft material for pubovaginal slings, durability and results. Urology 2003; 62: 805-9
14. Palma PCR, Riccetto CLZ, Herrmann V, Thiel M, Dambros M, Netto NR Jr. Sabre. experiência inicial com um novo modelo de sling sintético autofixável e absorvível, para tratamento da incontinência urinária de esforço feminina. Urodin Uroginecol 2002; 5: 14-20
15. Shobeiri SA, Echols KT, Franco N. Sinus formation after insertion of a silicone-coated suburethral sling. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2003; 14: 356-7
16. Morgan JE, Heritz DM, Stewart FE. The polypropylene pubovaginal sling for the treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 1995; 154: 1013-4
17. Staskin DR, Plzak L. Synthetic slings. pros and cons. Curr Urol Rep 2002; 3: 414-7
18. Duckett JRA, Constantine G. Complications of silicone sling insertion for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 2000; 163: 1835-7