An analysis of genetic diversity across the maize genome using microsatellites

Genetics

Volumn 169, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 1617-1630

  Vigouroux, Yves ^a,e   Mitchell, Sharon ^d   Matsuoka, Yoshihiro ^b   Hamblin, Martha ^d   Kresovich, Stephen ^d   Smith, J Stephen C ^c   Jaqueth, Jennifer ^c   Smith, Oscar S ^c   Doebley, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b FUKUI PREFECTURAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c Crop Genetics Research and Development   (United States)

^d Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^e INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE POUR LE DÉVELOPPEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MAIZE; MICROSATELLITE MARKER; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE REPEAT; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PLANT GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN MOTIF;

DINUCLEOTIDE REPEATS; DNA, PLANT; GENOME, PLANT; HETEROZYGOTE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REPETITIVE SEQUENCES, NUCLEIC ACID; VARIATION (GENETICS); ZEA MAYS;

EID: 17444378888     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.032086     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. ARMSTRONG, M., 1998 Basic Linear Geostatistics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany.
2. BALLOUX, F., H. BRUNNER, N. LUGON-MOULIN, J. HAUSSER and J. GOUDET, 2000 Microsatellites can be misleading: an empirical and simulation study. Evolution 54: 1415-1422.
3. BEAUMONT, M. A., and R. A. NICHOLS, 1996 Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 263: 1619-1626.
4. BOWCOCK, A. M., J. R. KIDD, J. L. MOUNTAIN, J. M. HEBERT, L. CAROTENUTO et al., 1991 Drift, admixture, and selection in human evolution: a study with DNA polymorphism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 839-843.
5. BUCKLER, E. S., and T. P. HOLTSFORD, 1996 Zea systematics: ribosomal ITS evidence. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 612-622.
6. CHARLESWORTH, B., M. T. MORGAN and D. CHARLESWORTH, 1993 The effects of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics 134: 1289-1303.
7. DOEBLEY, J. F., 1990 Molecular systematics of Zea (Gramineae). Maydica 35: 143-150.
8. DOEBLEY, J., and A. STEC, 1993 Inheritance of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte: comparison of results for two F2 populations. Genetics 134: 559-570.
9. DOEBLEY, J. F., M. M. GOODMAN and C. W. STUBER, 1984 Isoenzymatic variation in Zea (Gramineae). Syst. Bot. 9: 203-218.
10. EYRE-WALKER, A., R. L. GAUT, H. HILTON, D. L. FELDMAN and B. GAUT, 1998 Investigation of the bottleneck leading to the domestication of maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 4441-4446.
11. EWENS, W. J., 1972 The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. Theor. Popul. Biol. 3: 87-112.
12. GOUDET, J., 2001 FSTAT, a Program to Estimate and Test Gene Diversities and Fixation Indices, Version 2.9.3 (http://www.unil.ch/izea/soft wares/fstathtml).
13. HAWKINS, D. M., 1980 Identification of Outliers. Chapman & Hall, London.
14. HILTON, H., and B. S. GAUT, 1998 Speciation and domestication in maize and its wild relatives: evidence from the globuline-1 gene. Genetics 150: 863-872.
15. HUDSON, R. R., 1990 Gene, genealogy and the coalescent process. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 7: 1-44.
16. ILTIS, H. H., 1983 From teosinte to maize: the catastrophic sexual transmutation. Science 222: 886-894.
17. KIM, Y., and W. STEPHAN, 2000 Joint effects of genetic hitchhiking and background selection on neutral variation. Genetics 155: 1415-1427.
18. KIMURA, M., and J. CROW, 1964 The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49: 725-738.
19. KREITMAN, M., 2000 Methods to detect selection in populations with applications to the human. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 1: 539-559.
20. LABATE, J., K. R. LAMKEY, S. E. MITCHELL, S. KRESOVICH, H. SULLIVAN et al., 2003 Molecular and historical aspects of corn belt dent diversity. Crop Sci. 43: 80-91.
21. MATSUOKA, Y., S. E. MITCHELL, S. KRESOVICH, M. GOODMAN and J. DOEBLEY, 2002a Microsatellites in Zea - variability, patterns of mutations, and use for evolutionary studies. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104: 436-450.
22. MATSUOKA, Y., Y. VIGOUROUX, M. M. GOODMAN, J. SANCHEZ, G. E. BUCKLER et al 2002b A single domestication for maize shown by multilocus microsatellite genotyping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 6080-6084.
23. MAYNARD SMITH, J., and J. HAIGH, 1974 The hitchhiking effect of a favorable gene. Genet. Res. 23: 23-35.
24. OHTA, T., and M. KIMURA, 1973 A model of mutation appropriate to estimate the number of electrophoretically detectable alleles in a finite population. Genet. Res. 22: 201-204.
25. OHTA, T., and M. KIMURA, 1975 The effect of selected linked loci on heterozygosity of neutral alleles (the hitch-hiking effect). Genet. Res. 25: 313-326.
26. PRITCHARD, J. K., M. T. SEIELSTAD, A. PEREZ-LEZAUN and M. W. FELDMAN, 1999 Population growth of human Y chromosomes: a study of Y microsatellites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16: 1791-1798.
27. REMINGTON, D. L., J. M. THORNSBERRY, Y. MATSUOKA, L. M. WILSON, S. R. WHITT et al., 2001 Structure of linkage disequilibrium and phenotypic associations in the maize genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 11479-11484.
28. SCHNEIDER, S., D. ROESSLI and L. EXCOFFIER, 2000 Arlequin Ver. 2.000, a Software for Population Genetics Data Analysis. Genetics and Biometry, University of Geneva, Geneva.
29. SHAROPOVA, N., M. MCMULLEN, L. SCHULTZ, S. SCHROEDER, H. SANCHEZ-VILLEDA et al., 2002 Development and mapping of SSR markers for maize. Plant Mol. Biol. 48: 463-481.
30. SLATKIN, M., 1994 An exact test for neutrality based on the Ewens sampling distribution. Genet. Res. 64: 71-74.
31. SLATKIN, M., 1995 Hitchhiking and associative overdominance at a microsatellite locus. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12: 473-480.
32. SLATKIN, M., 1996 A correction to the exact test based on the Ewens sampling distribution. Genet. Res. 68: 259-260.
33. SMITH, B. D., 2001 Documenting plant domestication: the consilience of biological and archaeological approaches. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 1324-1326.
34. SOKAL, R. R., and F.J. ROHLF, 1995 Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. W. H. Freeman, New York.
35. TENAILLON, M. I., M. C. SAWKINS, A. D. LONG, R. L. GAUT, J. F. DOEBLEY et al., 2001 Patterns of DNA sequence polymorphism along chromosome 1 of maize (Zea mays ssp. mays L.). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 9161-9166.
36. TENAILLON, M. I., J. U'REN, O. TENAILLON and B. S. GAUT, 2004 Selection versus demography: a multilocus investigation of the domestication process in maize. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21: 1214-1225.
37. VIGOUROUX, Y.,J. S. JAQUETH, Y. MATSUOKA, O. S. SMITH, W. D. BEAVIS et al., 2002a Rate and pattern of mutation at microsatellite loci in maize. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 1251-1260.
38. VIGOUROUX, Y., M. MCMULLEN, C. T. HITTINGER, K. HOUCHINS, L. SCHULZ et al., 2002b Identifying genes of agronomic importance in maize by screening microsatellites for evidence of selection during domestication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 9650-9655.
39. VIGOUROUX, Y., Y. MATSUOKA and J. DOEBLEY, 2003 Directional evolution for microsatellite size in maize. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20: 1480-1483.
40. WANG, R. L., A. STEC, J. HEY, L. LUKENS and J. DOEBLEY, 1999 The limits of selection during maize domestication. Nature 398: 236-239.
41. WATTERSON, G. A., 1978 The homozygosity test of neutrality. Genetics 88: 405-417.
42. WEIR, B. S., 1996 Genetic Data Analysis II. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
43. WHITE, S., and J. DOEBLEY, 1999 The molecular evolution of terminal earl, a regulatory gene in the genus Zea. Genetics 153: 1455-1462.
44. WHITT, S., L. M. WILSON, M. TENAILLON, B. S. GAUT and E. BUCKLER, 2002 Genetic diversity and selection in the maize starch pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 12922-12962.
45. WIEHE, T. H. E., and W. STEPHAN, 1993 Analysis of a genetic hitch-hiking model, and its application to DNA polymorphism data from Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10: 842-854.