Comparative study of 17O and 18O isotope effects as a probe for dioxygen activation: Application to the soybean lipoxygenase reaction

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 119, Issue 47, 1997, Pages 11357-

  Glickman, Michael H ^a,c   Cliff, Steve ^b   Thiemens, Mark ^b   Klinman, Judith P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIPOXYGENASE; OXYGEN; OXYGEN 18; RADIOISOTOPE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENZYME MECHANISM; MOLECULAR PROBE; REACTION ANALYSIS; SOYBEAN;

EID: 17344364994     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja970689g     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Glickman, M. H.; Klinman, J. P. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 12882-12892.
2. Glickman, M. H.; Klinman, J. P. Biochemistry 1995, 34, 14077-14092.
3. Jonnson, T.; Glickman, M. H.; Sun, S.; Klinman, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10319-10320.
4. Tian, G.; Berry, J. A.; Klinman, J. P. Biochemistry 1994, 33, 226-234.
5. Tian, G.; Klinman, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 8891-8897.
6. Glickman, M. H.; Wiseman, J.; Klinman, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 793-794.
7. Hwang, C. C.; Grissom, C. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 795-796.
8. Buchachenko, A. L. Progr. React. Kinet. 1984, 13, 163-220.
9. Yasina, L. L.; Buchachenko, A. L. Chem. Phys. 1990, 146, 225-229.
10. Buchachenko, A. L.; Yasina, L. L.; Belyakov, V. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 95, 4954-4969.
11. Turro, N. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1983, 80, 609-621.
12. Buchachenko, A. L. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2507-2528.
13. Grissom, C. B. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95(N1), 3-24.
14. Heidenreich, J. E. I.; Theimens, M. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 84, 2129-2136.
15. Wen, J.; Thiemens, M. H. J. Geophys. Res. 1991, 96, 10911-10921.
16. Thiemens, M. H.; Jackson, T. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1988, 15, 639-642.
17. Guy, R. D.; Berry, J. A.; Fogel, M. L.; Hoering, T. C. Planta 1989, 77, 483-491.
18. Guy, R. D.; Fogel, M. L.; Berry, J. A. Plant Physiol. 1993, 101, 37-47.
19. Melander, L.; Saunders, W. H. Reaction Rates of Isotopic Molecules; R. E. Krieger Publishing: Malabar, FL, 1987.
20. Swain, C. G.; Stivers, E. L.; Reuwer, J. F.; Schaad, L. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 5885.
21. A similar value for r results from more sophisticated models of heavy atom isotope effects at room temperature (Huskey, W. P. In Enzyme Mechanism from Isotope Effects, Cook, P. F., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1991).
22. The delta formalism is common in atmospheric chemistry and geochemistry where the time of initiation of reaction and, hence, fractional conversion of reaction are unknown. This is a particularly useful way to represent multiple heavy atom isotope effects, since delta values (eq 2 in text) bypass the use of logarithmic values for numbers close to unity.
23. Nelson, M. J.; Seitz, S. P.; Cowling, R. A. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 6897-6903.
24. Nelson, M. J. Biochemistry 1988, 27, 4273-4278.
25. McMillen, D. F.; Golden, D. M. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1982, 33, 493-532.
26. Mathew, J. A.; Chun, H. W. S. J. Food Biochem. 1983, 7, 1-6.