Prospects for health impact assessment in the United States: New and improved environmental impact assessment or something different?

Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1153-1186

  Cole, Brian L ^a,p   Wilhelm, Michelle ^a,c   Long, Peter V ^a,g,i,l,m,n   Fielding, Jonathan E ^a,d,e,f,g,h   Kominski, Gerald ^a,i,j,k   Morgenstern, Hal ^b,i,o  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c Radian International LLC   (United States)

^d American College of Preventive Medicine   (United States)

^e NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (United States)

^f Amer College of Preventive Medicine ^*  (United States)

^g HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^k Prospective Payment Assess Commn   (United States)

^l Indian Hlth Ctr of S Clara Valley   (United States)

^m HENRY J KAISER FAMILY FOUNDATION   (United States)

ⁿ Kaiser Commission on Medicaid   (United States)

^o UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^p WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC OPINION; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

CALIFORNIA; ENVIRONMENT; EVALUATION STUDIES; HEALTH PLANNING; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; POLICY MAKING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 12144271051     PISSN: 03616878     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1215/03616878-29-6-1153     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Abba, K. 2002. Briefing Paper on Health Impact Assessment. Islington Public Health Department. www.candihps.com/downloads/pdfs/students/ briefing%20on%20hia .pdf.
2. American Association of Retired Persons, American College of Sports Medicine, American Geriatrics Society, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute on Aging, and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. 2001. National Blueprint: Increasing Physical Activity among Adults Aged 50 and Older. Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. www.rwjf.org/publications/ other.jsp.
3. Ashton, J. 1991. The Healthy Cities Project: A Challenge for Health Education. Health Education Quarterly 18: 39-48.
4. Bass, R. E., A. I. Herson, and K. M. Bogdan. 1999. CEQA Deskbook: A Step-by-Step Guide on How to Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act. 2nd ed. Point Arena, CA: Solano Press Books.
5. Bhatia, R., and M. Katz. 2001. Estimation of Health Benefits from a Local Living Wage Ordinance. American Journal of Public Health 91: 1398-1402.
6. Birley, M. H. 1995. Health Impact Assessment of Development Projects. London: HMSO. www.liv.ac.uk/~mhb/publicat/pubs1.htm.
7. British Medical Association. 1998. Health and Environmental Impact Assessment: An Integrated Approach. London: Earthscan.
8. Bullard, R. D., ed. 1993. Confronting Environmental Racism: Voices from the Grassroots, Boston: South End.
9. Caldwell, L. K. 1998. The National Environmental Policy Act: An Agenda for the Future. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
10. California Office of Planning and Research. 2001. Announcements from the State Clearinghouse - Summer, CEQA Update. www.opr.ca.gov/clearinghouse/summer 2001.shthl.
11. Canter, L. 1998. Integration of HIA and EIA. EIA Newsletter 16. Manchester: University of Manchester. www.art.man.ac.uk/EIA/nl16.htm.
12. City of Los Angeles. 1993. Playa Vista Phase I: Final EIR. Los Angeles: City of Los Angeles.
13. Council on Environmental Quality, Executive Office of the President. 1997a. The National Environmental Policy Act: A Study of Its Effectiveness after Twenty-Five Years. Washington DC: Council on Environmental Quality.
14. _. 1997b. Considering Cumulative Effects under the National Environmental Policy Act. Washington, DC: Council on Environmental Quality.
15. County of Los Angeles. 1997. Sunshine Canyon Subsequent Environmental Impact Report. Los Angeles: County of Los Angeles.
16. Dannenberg, A. L., R. J. Jackson, H. Frumkin, R. A. Schieber, M. Pratt, C. Kochtitzky, and H. H. Tilson. 2003. The Impact of Community Design and Land-Use Choices on Public Health: A Scientific Research Agenda. American Journal of Public Health 93: 1500-1508.
17. Eccleston, C. H. 1999. The NEPA Planning Process: A Comprehensive Guide with an Emphasis on Efficiency. New York: Wiley and Sons.
18. Epstein, P. R., and J. Selber, eds. 2002. Oil: A Life Cycle Analysis of Its Health and Environmental Impacts. Center for Health and the Global Environment, Harvard Medical School. www.med.harvard.edu/chge/fullreport.pdf.
19. Federal Aviation Administration and Los Angeles World Airports. 2001. Joint Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report. www.laxmaster plan.org/publications/eis_eir.html.
20. Fehr, R. 1999. Environmental Health Impact Assessment: Evaluation of a Ten-Step Model. Epidemiology 10: 618-625.
21. First International Conference on Health Promotion. 1986. The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Health Promotion 1: iii-v.
22. Freeman, R. 1995. Prevention and Government: Health Policy Making in the United Kingdom and Germany. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 20: 745-765.
23. Glouberman, S., and J. Millar. 2003. Evolution of the Determinants of Health, Health Policy, and Health Information Systems in Canada. American Journal of Public Health 93: 388-392.
24. Hammitt, J. K., E. S. Belsky, J. I. Levy, and J. D. Graham. 1999. Residential Building Codes, Affordability, and Health Protection: A Risk-Tradeoff Approach. Risk Analysis 19: 1037-1058.
25. Health Canada. 2000. The Canadian Handbook on Health Impact Assessment. Ottawa, Canada: Health Canada. www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ehd/oeha/hia.
26. Ison, E. 2000. Section 6: Models of Health Impact Assessment. In A Resource for Health Impact Assessment. London: National Health Service Executive. www.doh .gov.uk/london/rfhia6.pdf.
27. Judd, J., J. Prankish, and G. Moulton. 2001. Setting Standards in the Evaluation of Community-based Health Promotion Programmes - A Unifying Approach. Health Promotion International 16: 367-380.
28. Lavis, J. N. 2002. Ideas at the Margin or Marginalized Ideas? Nonmedical Determinants of Health in Canada. Health Affairs 21: 107-112.
29. Leon, B. F. 1993. Survey of Analyses in Environmental Impact Statements. In Environmental Analysis: The NEPA Experience, ed. S. G. Hildebrand and S. G. Cannon, 653-659. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis.
30. Mellman Group. 2002. Memo to Trust for America's Health on the National Survey on Public Perceptions of Risk from Bioterrorism and Other Health Threats. healthyamericans.org/newsroom/surveymemo0515.pdf.
31. Minnesota Health Improvement Project. 2002. Health Impact Assessment: A Review of the Literature. www.health.state.mn.us/divs/chs/mhip/.
32. National Association of County and City Health Officials and the American Planning Association. 2004. Symposium on Land Use and Health, Washington, DC, February 19-20.
33. New Partners for Smart Growth. 2004. Third Annual New Partners for Smart Growth: Building Safe, Healthy, and Livable Communities, Portland, OR, January 22-24.
34. New Zealand Ministry of Health. 1998. A Guide to Health Impact Assessment. Dunedin, New Zealand: Ministry of Health Publications. 210.48.125.104/moh.nsf/ wpg_Index/Publications-Index.
35. Northern and York Public Health Observatory. 2001. An Overview of Health Impact Assessment. Occasional Paper No. 1. www.nypho.org.uk/files/OC01.pdf.
36. Northridge, M. E., and E. Sclar. 2003. A Joint Urban Planning and Public Health Framework: Contributions to Health Impact Assessment. American Journal of Public Health 93: 118-121.
37. Parry, J., and A. Stevens. 2001. Prospective Health Impact Assessment: Pitfalls, Problems, and Possible Ways Forward. British Medical Journal 323: 1177-1182.
38. Patz, J. A., M. A. McGeehin, S. M. Bernard, K. L. Ebi, P. R. Epstein, A. Grambsch, D. J. Gubler, P. Reither, I. Romieu, J. B. Rose, J. M. Samet, and J. Trtanj. 2000. The Potential Health Impacts of Climate Variability and Change for the United States: Executive Summary of the Report of the Health Sector of the U.S. National Assessment. Environmental Health Perspectives 108: 367-376.
39. Ponce, R. A., S. M. Bartell, E. Y. Wong, D. LaFlamme, C. Carrington, R. C. Lee, D. L. Patrick, E. M. Faustman, and M. Bolger. 2000. Use of Quality-Adjusted Life Year Weights with Dose-Response Models for Public Health Decisions: A Case Study of the Risks and Benefits of Fish Consumption. Risk Analysis 20: 529-542.
40. Powell, M. R. 1999. Science at EPA: Information in the Regulatory Process. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
41. Rice, G., B. Boutin, M. Brown, R. Clark, J. Lipscomb, R. Miltner, L. Papa, R. Rheingans, J. Cohen, P. Murphy, T. Harvey, and L. Teuschler. 1999. Methodology for Comparing Risks, Benefits, and Financial Costs of Environmental Health Options. Paper presented at the 1999 Annual Meeting of the Society for Risk Analysis, Atlanta, Georgia, December 5-8, 1999. Abstract: www.riskworld.com/abstract/ 1999/SRAam99/abab9ab287.htm. Full report: www.epa.gov/ncea/frame.htm.
42. Sadler, B. 1996. Environmental Assessment in a Changing World. International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment, Final Report. Ottawa: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency.
43. _. 1998. Incorporating Health Considerations into EIA. EIA Newsletter 16. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester. www.art.man.ac.uk/EIA/nl16.htm.
44. Shaffer, H. J., and D. A. Korn. 2002. Gambling and Related Mental Disorders: A Public Health Analysis. Annual Review of Public Health 23: 171-212.
45. Signal, L., and G. Durham. 2000. Health Impact Assessment in New Zealand Policy Context. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand 15: 11-26.
46. Smith, J. L. 1992. Consideration of Socioeconomic Effects under NEPA and the EC Directive on Environmental Impact Assessment. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 355-375.
47. Solomon, R. M., S. Yonts-Shepard, and W. T. Supulski. 1997. Public Involvement under NEPA: Trends and Opportunities. In Environmental Policy and NEPA: Past, Present, and Future, ed. R. Clark and L. Canter. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie.
48. Speller, V., A. Learmonth, and D. Harrison. 1997. The Search for Evidence of Effective Health Promotion. British Medical Journal 315: 361-363.
49. Srinivasan, S., L. O'Fallon, and A. Dearry. 2002. Built Environment - Healthy Communities, Healthy Homes, Healthy People. Final Report, July 15-16. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. www.niehs .nih.gov/translat/BE-final.pdf.
50. Steinemann, A. 2000. Rethinking Human Health Impact Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20: 627-645.
51. Szreter, S. 2003. The Population Health Approach in Historical Perspective. American Journal of Public Health 93: 421-431.
52. Tasmania Department of Health and Human Services. 2002. Health Impact Assessment. www.dhhs.tas.gov.au/publichealth/legislationandguidelines/ healthimpact .html.
53. Tesh, S. 1988. Hidden Arguments: Political Ideology and Disease Prevention Policy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
54. U.S. Community Preventive Services Task Force. 2003. The Guide to Community Preventive Services. www.thecommunityguide.org.
55. U.S. Congressional Budget Office. n.d. Mission. www.cbo.gov/Mission.cfm (accessed January 20, 2004).
56. U.S. Congressional Research Service. n.d. About CRS. www.loc.gov/crsinfo/ whatscrs .html (accessed January 20, 2004).
57. U.S. Department of Energy. 2000. NEPA Document Cost and Completion Time Facts. Lessons Learned 24: 20-21. tis.eh.doe.gov/nepa/process/Il/2000SeptLLQR. pdf.
58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2001. The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Prevent and Decrease Overweight and Obesity. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General.
59. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1999. EPA's Section 309 Review: The Clean Air Act and NEPA. es.epa.gov/oeca/ofa/brochure.html.
60. _. 2001. EPA Office of Federal Activities, EIS Page Lengths, August 10. es.epa .gov/oeca/ofa/length.html.
61. U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Division of Extramural Research and Funding. 2003. Translational Research. www.niehs.nih.gov/translat.
62. World Bank. 1997. Health Aspects of Environmental Assessment. Environmental Assessment Sourcebook Update, number 18. Washington, DC: World Bank.
63. World Health Organization. 1986. Ottawa Charter on Health Promotion. Charter presented at First International Conference on Health Promotion, Ottawa, November 21. www.who.int/hpr/archive/docs/ottawa.html.
64. _. 1999. Health Impact Assessment: Main Concepts and Suggested Approach. Gothenberg Consensus Paper. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe. www.who.dk/hs/ECHP/index.htm.
65. Zaza, S., R. S. Lawrence, C. S. Mahan, M. Fullilove, D. Fleming, G. J. Isham, and M. Pappaioanou. 2000. Scope and Organization of the Guide to Community Preventive Services: The Task Force on Community Preventive Services. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 18: 27-34.