Dynamicity, fictivity, and scanning: The imaginative basis of logic and linguistic meaning

Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 164-197

  Langacker, Ronald W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17144414302     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511499968.008     Document Type: Chapter

References (57)

1. Barsalou, L.W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 577–660.
2. Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (1997). Then in conditional constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 8, 109–136.
3. Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press/Bradford.
4. Fauconnier, G. (1996). Analogical counterfactuals. In G. Fauconnier and E. Sweetser, Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar (pp. 57–90). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
5. Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Fauconnier, G., & Sweetser, E. (Eds.), (1996). Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
7. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998a). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science 22, 133–187.
8. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998b). Principles of conceptual integration. In J. P. Koenig (Ed.), Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar (pp. 269–283). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
9. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
10. Goldberg, A. E. (Ed.), (1996). Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
11. Goldsmith, J., & Woisetschlaeger, E. (1982). The logic of the English progressive. Linguistic Inquiry 13, 79–89.
12. Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
13. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental Models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Koenig, J. P. (Ed.), (1998). Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
15. Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics 9, 33–77.
16. Kumashiro, T. (2000). The Conceptual Basis of Grammar: A Cognitive Approach to Japanese Clausal Structure. San Diego: University of California doctoral dissertation.
17. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
18. Lakoff, G. (1990). The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on imageschemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1, 39–74.
19. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
20. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
21. Lakoff, G., & Núnez, R. (1998). Conceptual metaphor in mathematics. In J. P. Koenig (Ed.), Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar (pp. 219–237). Chicago and London: University
22. Lakoff, G.,& Núnez, R. (1998). Conceptual metaphor in mathematics. In J. P. Koenig (Ed.), Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar (pp. 219-237). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
23. Lakoff, G., & Núnez, R. (2000). Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.
24. Langacker, R. W. (1986). Abstract motion. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 12, 455–471.
25. Langacker, R. W. (1987a). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
26. Langacker, R.W. (1987b). Nouns and verbs. Language 63, 53–94.
27. Langacker, R.W. (1990). Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1, 5–38.
28. Langacker, R.W. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2, Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
29. Langacker, R.W. (1993). Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 4, 1–38.
30. Langacker, R.W. (1995). Possession and possessive constructions. In J. R. Taylor and R. E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World (pp. 51– 79). Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 82. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
31. Langacker, R. W. (1996a). Conceptual grouping and pronominal anaphora. In B. Fox (Ed.), Studies in Anaphora (pp. 333–378). Typological Studies in Language 33. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
32. Langacker, R. W. (1996b). A constraint on progressive generics. In Goldberg, A. E. (Ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language (pp. 289–302). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
33. Langacker, R.W. (1997a). A dynamic account of grammatical function. In J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Type Dedicated to T. Giv´on (pp. 249–273). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
34. Langacker, R.W. (1997b). Generics and habituals. In A. Athanasiadou and R. Dirven (Eds.), On Conditionals Again (pp. 191–222). Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 143. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
35. Langacker, R.W. (1999a). Grammar and Conceptualization. Cognitive Linguistics Research 14. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
36. Langacker, R. W. (1999b). Virtual reality. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 29, 2, 77–103.
37. Langacker, R. W. (1999c). Double-subject constructions. In Sung-Yun Bak (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm 4 (pp. 83–104). Seoul: Hanshin.
38. Langacker, R.W. (1999d). Assessing the cognitive linguistic enterprise. In T. Janssen and G. Redeker (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope, and Methodology (pp. 13–59). Cognitive Linguistics Research 15. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
39. Langacker, R. W. (1999e). Losing control: Grammaticization, subjectification, and transparency. In A. Blank and P. Koch (Eds.), Historical Semantics and Cognition (pp. 147–175). Cognitive Linguistics Research 13. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
40. Langacker, R. W. (2000). Why a mind is necessary: Conceptualization, grammar and linguistic semantics. In L. Albertazzi (Ed.), Meaning and Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Approach (pp. 25–38). Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 2. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
41. Langacker, R.W. (2001a). Dynamicity in grammar. Axiomathes 12, 7–33.
42. Langacker, R.W. (2001b). Topic, subject, and possessor. In H. G. Simonsen and R. T. Endresen (Eds.), A Cognitive Approach to the Verb: Morphological and Constructional Perspectives (pp. 11–48). Cognitive Linguistics Research 16. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
43. Langacker, R.W. (2003). Dynamicity, fictivity, and scanning: The imaginative basis of logic and linguistic meaning. Korean Linguistics 18, 1–64.
44. Matsumoto, Y. (1996a). How abstract is subjective motion? A comparison of coverage path expressions and access path expressions. In Goldberg, A. E. (Ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. (pp. 359–373). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
45. Matsumoto, Y. (1996b). Subjective-change expressions in Japanese and their cognitive and linguistic bases. In G. Fauconnier and E. Sweetser (Eds.), Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar (pp. 124–156). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
46. Michaelis, L. A. (1991). Temporal priority and pragmatic ambiguity: The case of already. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 17, 426–438.
47. Michaelis, L. A. (1993). “Continuity” within three scalar models: The polysemy of adverbial still. Journal of Semantics 10, 193–237.
48. Michaelis, L. A. (1996). Cross-world continuity and the polysemy of adverbial still. In G. Fauconnier and E. Sweetser (Eds.), Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar (pp. 179–226). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
49. Sweetser, E. (1982). Root and epistemic modals: Causality intwoworlds. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 8, 484–507.
50. Sweetser, E. (1996). Mental spaces and the grammar of conditional constructions. In G. Fauconnier and E. Sweetser (Eds.), Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar (pp. 318–333). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
51. Sweetser, E. (1997). Role and individual interpretations of change predicates. In J. Nuyts and E. Pederson (Eds.), Language and Conceptualization (pp. 116–136). Language, Culture and Cognition 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12, 49–100.
53. Talmy, L. (1996). Fictive motion in language and “ception.” In P. Bloom et al. (Eds.), Language and Space (pp. 211–276). Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press/Bradford.
54. Talmy, L. (2000a). Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. 1, Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford.
55. Talmy, L. (2000b). Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. 2, Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. van Hoek, K. (1995). Conceptual reference points: A cognitive grammar account of pronominal anaphora constraints. Language 71, 310–340.
57. van Hoek, K. (1997). Anaphora and Conceptual Structure. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.