Is arthropod predation exclusively satiation-driven?

Oikos

Volumn 109, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 101-116

  Van Rijn, Paul C J ^a,b   Bakker, Frank M ^a   Van Der Hoeven, Wietske A D ^a   Sabelis, Maurice W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGY NIOO KNAW   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPOD; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE; MODEL; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; PREY CAPTURE;

ACARI; ARTHROPODA; FRANKLINIELLA OCCIDENTALIS; NEOSEIULUS BARKERI; NEOSEIULUS CUCUMERIS; THRIPS TABACI;

EID: 17144404608     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.12987.x     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Agarwala, B. K., Bardhanroy, P., Yasuda, H. et al. 2001. Prey consumption and oviposition of the aphidophagous predator Menochilus sexmaculatus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in relation to prey density and adult size. - Environ. Entomol. 30: 1182-1187.
2. Bakker, F. M. and Sabelis, M. W. 1989. How larvae of Thrips tabaci reduce the attack success of phytoseiid predators. - Entomol. Exp. Appl. 50: 47-51.
3. Beddington, J. R., Hassell, M. P. and Lawton, J. H. 1976. The components of arthropod predation. II. The predator rate of increase. - J. Anim. Ecol. 45: 165-185.
4. Bernstein, C. and Driessen, G. 1996. Patch-marking and optimal search patterns in the parasitoid Venturia canescens. - J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 211-219.
5. Bonde, J. 1989. Biological studies including population growth parameters of the predatory mite Amblyseius barkeri (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) at 25°C in the laboratory. - Entomophaga 34: 275-287.
6. Boo, K. S., Chung, I. B., Han, K. S. et al. 1998. Response of the lacewing Chrysopa cognata to pheromones of its aphid prey. - J. Chem. Ecol. 24: 631-643.
7. Castagnoli, M. and Simoni, S. 1999. Effect of long-term feeding history on functional and numerical response of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). - Exp. Appl. Acarol. 23: 217-234.
8. Castagnoli, M., Del Bene, G., Gargani, E. et al. 1990. Suitability of Amblyseius cucumeris (Oud.) (Acarina Phytoseiidae) for the biological control of Thrips tabaci Lind. and Frankliniella occidentals (Pergande) (Thys. Thripidae). - Redia 73: 53-61.
9. Charnov, E. L. 1976. Optimal foraging: attack strategy of a mantid. - Am. Nat. 110: 141-151.
10. Curry, G. L. and DeMichele, D. W. 1977. Stochastic analysis for the description and synthesis of predator-prey systems. - Can. Entomol. 109: 1167-1174.
11. Dicke, M. 1999. Are herbivore-induced plant volatiles reliable indicators of herbivore identity to foraging carnivorous arthropods? - Entomol. Exp. Appl. 91: 131-142.
12. Dicke, M. and Sabelis, M. W. 1988. How plants obtain predatory mites as bodyguards. - Neth. J. Zool. 38: 148-165.
13. Dicke, M., Sabelis, M. W. and Van den Berg, H. 1989. Does prey preference change as a result of prey species presented together? Analysis of prey selection by the predatory mite Typhlodromus pyri (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). - Oecologia 81: 302-309.
14. Draper, N. R. and Smith, H. 1966. Applied regression analysis. - John Wiley & Sons.
15. Drukker, B., Bruin, J. and Sabelis, M. W. 2000a. Anthocorid predators learn to associate herbivore-induced plant volatiles with presence or absence of prey. - Physiol. Entomol. 25: 260-265.
16. Drukker, B., Bruin, J., Jacobs, G. et al. 2000b. How predatory mites learn to cope with variability in volatile plant signals in the environment of their herbivorous prey. - Exp. Appl. Acarol. 24: 881-895.
17. Eveleigh, E. S. and Chant, D. A. 1981. The feeding and searching behaviour of two species of phytoseiid mites, Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henviot and Amblyseius degenerans (Berlese), at different prey densities (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). - Can. J. Zool. 59: 1419-1430.
18. Fan, Y. Q. and Petitt, F. L. 1994. Biological control of Broad Mite, Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks), by Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes on pepper. - Biol. Control 4: 390-395.
19. Fransz, H. G. 1974. The functional response to prey density in an acarine system. Simulation monographs. Pudoc, Wageningen.
20. Hassell, M. P., Lawton, J. H. and Beddington, J. R. 1976. The components of arthropod predation I. The prey death rate. - J. Anim. Ecol. 45: 135-164.
21. Hayes, A. J. 1988. A laboratory study on the predatory mite, Typhlodromus pyri (Acarina, Phytoseiidae). 2. The effect of temperature and prey consumption on the numerical response of adult females. - Res. Popul. Ecol. 30: 13-24.
22. Haynes, K. F. and Yeargan, K. V. 1999. Exploitation of intraspecific communication systems: illicit signalers and receivers. - Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 92: 960-970.
23. Hazzard, R. V. and Ferro, D. V. 1991. Feeding responses of adult Coleomegilla maculata (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) to eggs of Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) and green peach aphids (Homoptera, Aphididae). - Environ. Entomol. 20: 644-651.
24. Heimpel, G. E. and Houghgoldstein, J. A. 1994. Components of the functional response of Perillus bioculatus (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae). - Environ. Entomol. 23: 855-859.
25. Hirvonen, H. 1999. Shifts in foraging tactics of larval damselflies: effects of prey density. - Oikos 86: 443-452.
26. Hirvonen, H. and Ranta, E. 1996. Prey to predator size ratio influences foraging efficiency of larval Aeshna juncea dragonflies. - Oecologia 106: 407-415.
27. Holling, C. S. 1959. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. - Can. Entomol. 91: 385-398.
28. Holling, C. S. 1966. The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density. - Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can. 48: 1-86.
29. Janssen, A., Pallini, A., Venzon, M. et al. 1998. Behaviour and food web interactions among plant inhabiting mites and thrips. - Exp. Appl. Acarol. 22: 497-521.
30. Janssen, A., Faraji, F., Van der Hammen, T. et al. 2002. Interspecific infanticide deters predators. - Ecol. Lett. 5: 490-494.
31. Jeschke, J. M., Kopp, M. and Tollrian, R. 2002. Predator functional responses: discriminating between handling and digesting prey. - Ecol. Monogr 72: 95-112.
32. Kielty, J. P., Allen Williams, L. J., Underwood, N. et al. 1996. Behavioral responses of three species of ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) to olfactory cues associated with prey and habitat. - J. Insect Behav. 9: 237-250.
33. Mansour, F. and Heimbach, U. 1993. Evaluation of lycosid, micryphantid and linyphiid spiders as predators of Rhopalosiphum padi (Hom., Aphididae) and their functional response to prey density - laboratory experiments. - Entomophaga 38: 79-87.
34. Messina, F. J. and Hanks, J. B. 1998. Host plant alters the shape of the functional response of an aphid predator (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). - Environ. Entomol. 27: 1196-1202.
35. Metz, J. A. J. and Van Batenburg, F. H. D. 1985a. Holling's "hungry mantid" model for the invertabrate functional response considered as a Markov process. Part I: The full model and some of its limits. - J. Math. Biol. 22: 209-238.
36. Metz, J. A. J. and Van Batenburg, F. H. D. 1985b. Holling's "hungry mantid" model for the invertabrate functional response considered as a Markov process. Part II: Negligable handling time. - J. Math. Biol. 22: 239-257.
37. Metz, J. A. J., Sabelis, M. W. and Kuchlein, J. H. 1988. Sources of variation in predation rates at high prey densities: an analytic model and a mite example. - Exp. Appl. Acarol. 5: 187-205.
38. Momen, F. M. 1996. Effect of prey density on reproduction, prey consumption and sex-ratio of Amblyseius barkeri (Acari: Phytoseiidae). - Acarologia 37: 3-6.
39. Mondor, E. B. and Roitberg, B. D. 2000. Has the attraction of predatory coccinellids to cornicle droplets constrained aphid alarm signaling behavior? - J. Insect Behav. 13: 321-329.
40. Montserrat, M., Albajes, R. and Castane, C. 2000. Functional response of four Heteropteran predators preying on greenhouse whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) and western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). - Environ. Entomol. 29: 1075-1082.
41. Monyaneza, J. and Obrycki, J. J. 1998. Searching behavior of Coleomegilla maculata larvae feeding on Colorado potato beetle eggs. - Biol. Control 13: 85-90.
42. Mori, H. 1969. The influence of prey density on the predation of Amblyseius longispinosus (Evans) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). - Proc. 2nd Int. Congr. Acarology 1967: 149-153.
43. Nwilene, F. E. and Nachman, G. 1996a. Functional responses of Iphiselus degenerans and Neoseiulus teke (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to changes in the density of the cassave green mite, Mononychellus tanajoa (Acari: Tetranychidae). - Exp. Appl. Acarol. 20: 259-271.
44. Nwilene, F. E. and Nachman, G. 1996b. Reproductive responses of Iphiseius degenerans and Neoseiulus teke (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to changes in the density of the cassave green mite, Mononychellus tanajoa (Acari: Tetranychidae). - Exp. Appl. Acarol. 20: 273-282.
45. Opit, G. P., Roitberg, B. and Gillespie, D. R. 1997. The functional response and prey preference of Feltiella acarisuga (Vallot) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) for two of its prey: male and female twospotted spider mites, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). - Can. Entomol. 129: 221-227.
46. Peterson, B. S. 1990. The effects of host plant on the biological control of western flower thrips by the predatory mite, Amblyseius cucumeris. - MSc paper, Simon Fraser Univ., Burnaby, British Columbia.
47. Ramakers, P. M. J. 1983. Mass production and introduction of Amblyseius mckenziei and A. cucumeris. - IOBC/WPRS Bull. 6: 203-206.
48. Sabelis, M. W. 1981. Biological control of two-spotted spider mites using phytoseiid predators. Part I, Ph.D. thesis, Agric. Res. Rep. 910. Pudoc, Wageningen.
49. Sabelis, M. W. 1985. Predator-prey interaction: predation on spider mites. - In: Helle, W. and Sabelis, M. W. (eds), Spider mites: their biology, natural enemies and control. 1B. Elsevier, pp. 103-129.
50. Sabelis, M. W. 1986. The functional response of predatory mites to the density of two-spotted spider mites. - In: Metz, J. A. J. and Diekmann, O. (eds), Dynamics of physiological structured populations. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, Springer-Verlag, pp. 298-321.
51. Sabelis, M. W. 1990. How to analyse prey preference when prey density varies? A new method to discriminate between effects of gut fullness and prey type composition. - Oecologia 82: 289-298.
52. Sabelis, M. W. 1992. Predatory arthropods. - In: Crawley, M. J. (ed.), Natural enemies: the population biology of predators, parasites end diseases. Blackwell, pp. 225-264.
53. Sabelis, M. W. and Dicke, M. 1985. Long-range dispersal and searching behaviour. - In: Helle, W. and Sabelis, M. W. (eds), Spider mites: their biology, natural enemies and control. 1B. Elsevier, pp. 141-160.
54. Sabelis, M. W. and Van Rijn, P. C. J. 1997. Predation by insects and mites. - In: Lewis, T. (ed.), Thrips as crop pests. CAB-International, pp. 259-354.
55. Sheehan, W., Wäckers, F. L. and Lewis, W. J. 1993. Discrimination of previously searched, host-free sites by Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). - J. Insect Behav. 6: 323-331.
56. Shipp, J. L. and Whitfield, G. H. 1991. Functional response of the predatory mite, Amblyseius cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae), on western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). - Environ. Entomol. 20: 694-699.
57. Skellam, J. G. 1951. Random dispersal in theoretical populations. - Biometrika 38: 196-218.
58. Stewart, C. D., Braman, S. K. and Pendley, A. F. 2002. Functional response of the azalea plant bug (Heteroptera: Miridae) and a green lacewing Chrysoperla rufilabris (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), two predators of the azalea lace bug (Heteroptera: Tingidae). - Environ. Entomol. 31: 1184-1190.
59. Takabayashi, J., Dicke, M. and Posthumus, M. A. 1994. Volatile herbivore-induced terpenoids in plant mite interactions-variation caused by biotic and abiotic factors. - J. Chem. Ecol. 20: 1329-1354.
60. Takafuji, A. and Chant, D. A. 1976. Comparative studies of two species of predacious phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae), with special reference to their response to the density of their prey. - Res. Popul. Ecol. 17: 255-310.
61. Teerling, C. R., Gillespie, D. R. and Borden, J. H. 1993a. Utilization of western flower thrips alarm pheromone as a prey-finding kairomone by predators. - Can. Entomol. 125: 431-437.
62. Teerling, C. R., Pierce, H. D., Borden, J. H. et al. 1993b. Identification and bioactivity of alarm pheromone in the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis. - J. Chem. Ecol. 19: 681-697.
63. Van den Meiracker, R. A. F and Sabelis, M. W. 1999. Do functional responses of predatory arthropods reach a plateau? A case study of Orius insidiosus with western flower thrips as prey. - Entomol. Exp. Appl. 90: 323-329.
64. Van der Hoeven, W. A. D. and Van Rijn, P. C. J. 1990. Factors affecting the attack success of predatory mites on thrips larvae. - Proc. Exp. Appl. Entomol. 1: 25-30.
65. Van Rijn, P. C. J. and Van Houten, Y. M. 1991. Life history of Amblyseius cucumeris and Amblyseius barkeri (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on a diet of pollen. - In: Dusbabek, F. and Bukva, V (eds), Modern acarology. Academia, Prague and SPB Academic Publishing BV, Vol. 2, pp. 647-654.
66. Van Houten, Y. M., Van Rijn, P. C. J., Tanigoshi, L. K. et al. 1995. Preselection of predatory mites for year-round control of western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis), in greenhouse crops. - Entomol. Exp. Appl. 74: 225-234.
67. Van Rijn, P. C. J. and Tanigoshi, L. K. 1999. Pollen as food for the predatory mites Iphiseius degenerans and Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae): dietary range and life history. - Exp. Appl. Acarol. 23: 785-802.