Curing depth of a resin-modified glass ionomer and two resin-based luting agents

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 185-189

  Sigemori, R M ^a   Reis, A F ^a   Giannini, M ^a   Paulillo, L A M S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLASS IONOMER; RESIN CEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; TOOTH; TOOTH ROOT CANAL;

BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HARDNESS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMERS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 17144396246     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Asmussen E (1982) Restorative resins: Hardness and strength vs quantity of remaining double bonds Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 90(6) 484-489.
2. Blackman R, Barghi N & Duke E (1990) Influence of ceramic thickness on the polymerization of light-cured resin cement The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 63(3) 295-300.
3. Chan FW, Harcourt JK & Brockhurst PJ (1993) The effect of post adaptation in the root canal on retention of posts cemented with various cements Australian Dental Journal 38(1) 39-45.
4. Chung KH & Greener EH (1990) Correlation between degree of conversion, filler concentration and mechanical properties of posterior composite resins Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 17(5) 487-494.
5. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newman I, Musikant BL & Deutsch AS (2000) Retention of four endodontic posts cemented with composite resin General Dentistry 48(3) 320-324.
6. Davidson CL & Mjör IA (1999) Advances in Glass Ionomer Cements Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co.
7. DeWald JP & Ferracane JL (1987) A comparison of four modes of evaluating depth of cure of light-activated composites Journal of Dental Research 66(3) 727-730.
8. El-Mowafy OM, Rubo MH & El-Badrawy WA (1999) Hardening of new resin cements cured through a ceramic inlay Operative Dentistry 24(1) 38-44.
9. Ferrari M, Vichi A & Grandini S (2001) Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on bonding to root canal walls: A SEM investigation Dental Materials 17(5) 422-429.
10. Hasegawa EA, Boyer DB & Chan DC (1991) Hardening of dual-cured cements under composite resin inlays The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 66(2) 187-192.
11. Hofmann N, Papsthart G, Hugo B & Klaiber B (2001) Comparison of photo-activation versus chemical or dual-curing of resin-based luting cements regarding flexural strength, modulus and surface hardness Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 28(11) 1022-1028.
12. Mendoza DB & Eakle WS (1994) Retention of posts cemented with various dentinal bonding cements The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 72(6) 591-594.
13. Morgano SM & Brackett SE (1999) Foundation restorations in fixed prosthodontics: Current knowledge and future needs Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 82(6) 643-657.
14. Nash RW (1998) The use of posts for endodontically treated teeth Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 19(10) 1054-1056, 1058, 1060.
15. Rueggeberg FA & Caughman WF (1993) The influence of light exposure on polymerization of dual-cure resin cements Operative Dentistry 18(2) 48-55.
16. Rueggeberg FA & Craig RG (1988) Correlation of parameters used to estimate monomer conversion in a light-cured composite Journal of Dental Research 67 932-937.
17. Ruyter IE & Øysæd H (1982) Conversion in different depths of ultraviolet and visible light activated composite materials Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 40(3) 179-192.
18. Saupe WA, Gluskin AH & Radke RA Jr (1996) A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots Quintessence International 27(1) 483-491.
19. Silikas N, Eliades G & Watts DC (2000) Light intensity effects on resin-composite degree of conversion and shrinkage strain Dental Materials 16(4) 292-296.