Configural coding of facial expressions: The impact of inversion and photographic negative

Visual Cognition

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 495-518

  Calder, Andrew J ^a   Jansen, Jesse ^b  

^a MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^b NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FACIES; FEMALE; GESTALT THERAPY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHOTOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VISUAL MEMORY;

EID: 17144369493     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280444000418     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bassili, J. N. (1979). Emotion recognition: The role of facial movement and the relative importance of upper and lower areas of the face. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2049-2058.
2. Bruce, V., & Young, A. W. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305-327.
3. Calder, A. J., Burton, A. M., Miller, P., Young, A. W., & Akamatsu, S. (2001). A principal component analysis of facial expressions. Vision Research, 41(9), 1179-1208.
4. Calder, A. J., Young, A. W., Keane, J., & Dean, M. (2000). Configural information in facial expression perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(2), 527-551.
5. Carey, S. (1981). The development of face perception. In G. Davies, H. Ellis, & J. Shepard (Eds.), Perceiving and remembering faces. New York: Academic Press.
6. Carey, S. (1992). Becoming a face expert. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, B335, 95-103.
7. Carey, S., & Diamond, R. (1994). Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children? Visual Cognition, 1 2/3), 253-274.
8. Cottrell, G. W., Branson, K. M., & Calder, A. J. (2002). Do expression and identity need separate representations? Paper presented at the 24th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Fairfax, VA, USA.
9. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1976). Pictures of facial affect. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
10. Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. F. (1964). Recognition of children's faces. Child Development, 35, 129-136.
11. Hole, G. J. (1994). Configurational factors in the perception of unfamiliar faces. Perception, 23, 65-74.
12. Hole, G. J., George, P. A., & Dunsmore, V. (1999). Evidence for holistic processing of faces viewed as photographic negative. Perception, 28, 341-259.
13. Kemp, R. I., McManus, C., & Pigott, T. (1990). Sensitivity to the displacement of facial features in negative and inverted images. Perception, 19, 531-543.
14. Maurer, D., le Grand, R., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 255-260.
15. Mondloch, C. J., le Grand, R., & Maurer, D. (2002). Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing. Perception, 31, 553-566.
16. Rakover, S. S. (2002). Featural and configurational information in faces: A conceptual and empirical analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 1-30.
17. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A 2), 225-245.
18. Tanaka, J. W., Kay, J. B., Grinnell, E., Stansfield, B., & Szechter, L. (1998). Face recognition in young children: When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Visual Cognition, 5(4), 479-496.
19. White, M. (2000). Parts and wholes in expression recognition. Cognition and Emotion, 4(1), 39-60.
20. Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747-759.