Tolerable hearing-aid delays: IV. Effects on subjective disturbance during speech production by hearing-impaired subjects

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 225-235

  Stone, Michael A ^a   Moore, Brian C J ^a  

^a UK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; INNER EAR DISEASE; LOUDNESS; LOW FREQUENCY NOISE; MICROPHONE; READING; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SIMULATION; SPEECH DISORDER; TIME;

ATTITUDE; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING DISORDERS; HUMANS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 17044397817     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200504000-00009     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Black, J. W. (1951). The effect of delayed side-tone upon vocal rate and intensity. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 16, 56-60.
2. Byrne, D., Dillon, H., Tran, K., Arlinger, S., Wilbraham, K., et al. (1994). An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 2108-2120.
3. Hansen, M. Ø., & Stinson, M. R. (1998). Air conducted and body conducted sound produced by own voice. Canadian Acoustics, 26, 11-19.
4. Killion, M. C., Wilber, L. A., & Gudmundsen, G. I. (1988). Zwislocki was right: A potential solution to the "hollow voice" problem (the amplified occlusion effect) with deeply sealed earmolds. Hearing Instruments, 39, 14-18.
5. Marriage, J. E., Moore, B. C. J., & Alcantara, J. I. (2004). Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. III. Inexperienced versus experienced users. International Journal of Audiology, 43, 198-210.
6. Moore, B. C. J., Alcántara, J. I., & Marriage, J. E. (2001). Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally. British Journal of Audiology, 35, 339-353.
7. Moore, B. C. J., Alcántara, J. I., Stone, M. A., & Glasberg, B. R. (1999). Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. II. Hearing aids with multi-channel compression. British Journal of Audiology, 33, 157-170.
8. Moore, B. C. J., Glasberg, B. R., & Stone, M. A. (1999). Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression. British Journal of Audiology, 33, 241-258.
9. Moore, B. C. J., Huss, M., Vickers, D. A., Glasberg, B. R., & Alcantara, J. I. (2000). A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. British Journal of Audiology, 34, 205-224.
10. Stone, M. A., & Moore, B. C. J. (1999). Tolerable hearing-aid delays. I. Estimation of limits imposed by the auditory path alone using simulated hearing losses. Ear and Hearing, 20, 182-192.
11. Stone, M. A., & Moore, B. C. J. (2002). Tolerable hearing-aid delays. II. Estimation of limits imposed during speech production. Ear and Hearing, 23, 325-338.
12. Stone, M. A., & Moore, B. C. J. (2003). Tolerable hearing-aid delays. III. Effects on speech production and perception of across-frequency variation in delay. Ear and Hearing, 24, 175-183.
13. Stone, M. A., Moore, B. C. J., Alcántara, J. I., & Glasberg, B. R. (1999). Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 3603-3619.
14. Stuart, A., Kalinowski, J., Rastatter, M. P., & Lynch, K. (2002). Effect of delayed auditory feedback on normal speakers at two speech rates. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 2237-2241.
15. Zwislocki, J. (1953). Acoustic attenuation between the ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 752-759.