Multidimensional analysis for custom content for multiple audiences

ACM Special Interest Group for Design. of Commun.; SIGDOC 2003: Finding Real-World Solutions for Doc.: How Theory Informs Pract. and Pract. Informs Theory. Proc. of the 21st Annu. Int. Conf. on Doc.

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-5

  Albers, Michael J ^a  

^a University of Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

Audience analysis; Dynamic documents; Multidimensional analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COST EFFECTIVENESS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; XML;

AUDIENCE ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC CUSTOM DOCUMENTS; DYNAMIC DOCUMENTS; MULTIDIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS;

TECHNICAL WRITING;

EID: 17044393431     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/944868.944870     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Albers, M. Design of Complex Information. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, in press.
2. Albers, M. Complex problem solving and content analysis. Content and Complexity, eds. M. Albers and B. Mazur. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. (2003): 263-284.
3. Albers, M. The technical editor and document databases: What the future may hold. Technical Communication Quarterly 9:2, (2000): 191-206.
4. Burnett, R. Technical Communication. Boston: Heinle & Heinle. 2000.
5. Caricato, J. Visuals for speaking presentations: An analysis of the presenter's perspective of audience as a partner in visual design. Technical Communication 47:4 (2000): 496-514.
6. Carroll, J. (ed.) Scenario-based. Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. New York: Wiley, 1995.
7. Cilliers, P. Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. New York: Routledge. 1998.
8. Cooper, A. The inmates are running the asylum. Indianapolis, IN: Sams. 1999.
9. Hackos, J. and Redish, J. User and Task Analysis for Interface Design. New York: Wiley, 1998.
10. Klein, G. Sources of Power: How People make Decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT. 1999.
11. McNamara, D. Kintsch, E., Songer, N., and Kintsch, W. Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction 14.1 (1996): 1-43.
12. Mirel, B. Cognitive processing, text linguistics and documentation writing. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 18:2 (1988): 111-133.
13. Mirel, B. Applied constructivism for user documentation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 12.1 (1998): 7-49.
14. O'Malley, C. Helping users help themselves. User Centered. System Design: New Perspectives on Human-computer Interaction, eds. D. Norman and S. Draper. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA (1986): 399-410.
15. Rockley, A. The impact of single sourcing and technology. Technical Communication 48:2 (2001): 189-193.
16. Schriver, K. Dynamics in Document Design. New York: Wiley. 1996.
17. Simon, H. Models of Thought. New Haven, CT: Yale UP. 1979.