Element-arrangement textures in multiple objective tasks

Spatial Vision

Volumn 18, Issue 2 SPEC. ISS., 2005, Pages 209-226

  Wolfson, S Sabina ^a   Graham, Norma ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Beck; Complex channels; Contrast gain control; Element arrangement textures; Nonlinearities; Normalization; Second order; Texture

Indexed keywords

GAIN CONTROL; LUMINESCENCE; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; TEXTURES;

BECK; COMPLEX CHANNELS; CONTRAST-GAIN CONTROL; ELEMENT-ARRANGEMENT TEXTURES; NONLINEARITIES; NORMALIZATION; SECOND-ORDER;

VISION;

ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMAN; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS;

EID: 17044363635     PISSN: 01691015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/1568568053320602     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Ashida, H., Seiffert, A. E. and Osaka, N. (2001). Inefficient visual search for second-order motion, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 2255.
2. Beck, J. (1972). Similarity grouping and peripheral discriminability under uncertainty, Amer. J. Psychol. 85, 1-19.
3. Beck, J. (1975). The relation between similarity grouping and perceptual constancy, Amer. J. Psychol. 88, 397-409.
4. Beck, J. (1982). Texture segmentation, in: Organization and Representation in Perception, Beck, J. (Ed.), pp. 285-317. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA.
5. Beck, J. (1994). Interference in the perceived segregation of equal-luminance element-arrangement texture patterns, Perception and Psychophysics 56, 424-430.
6. Beck, J., Prazdny, K. and Rosenfeld, A. (1983). A theory of textural segmentation, in: Human and Machine Vision, Beck, J., Hope, B. and Rosenfeld, A. (Eds), pp. 1-38. Academic Press, New York.
7. Beck, J., Sutter, A. and Ivry, R. (1987). Spatial frequency channels and perceptual grouping in texture segregation, Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 37, 299-325.
8. Beck, J., Graham, N. and Sutter, A. (1991). Lightness differences and the perceived segregation of regions and populations, Perception and Psychophysics 49, 257-269.
9. Bonds, A. B. (1993). The encoding of cortical contrast gain control, in: Contrast Sensitivity, Shapley, R. M. and Lam, D. M. (Eds), pp. 215-223. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
10. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox, Spatial Vision 10, 443-446.
11. Chubb, C. and Sperling, G. (1988). Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A 5, 1986-2007.
12. Chubb, C. and Sperling, G. (1989). Two motion perception mechanisms revealed by distance driven reversal of apparent motion, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 2985-2989.
13. Davis, E. T., Kramer, P. and Graham, N. (1983). Uncertainty about spatial frequency, spatial position, or contrast of visual patterns, Perception and Psychophysics 33, 20-28.
14. Ellemberg, D., Hess, R. F. and Allen, H. A. (2004). Evidence for spatial frequency and orientation labelled detectors in second-order visual processing, Vision Sciences Society, abstract #E68, p. 137.
15. Graham, N. (1989). Visual Pattern Analyzers. Oxford University Press, New York.
16. Graham, N. (1991). Complex channels, early local nonlinearities, and normalization in perceived texture segregation, in: Computational Models of Visual Processing, Landy, M. S and Movshon, J. A. (Eds), pp. 273-290. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
17. Graham, N. (1992). Breaking the visual stimulus into parts, Current Directions in Psychological Science 1, 55-61.
18. Graham, N. and Sutter, A. (1996). Effect of spatial scale and background luminance on the intensive and spatial nonlinearities in texture segregation, Vision Research 36, 1371-1390.
19. Graham, N. and Sutter, A. (1998). Spatial summation in simple (Fourier) and complex (non-Fourier) texture channels, Vision Research 38, 231-257.
20. Graham, N. and Sutter, A. (2000). Normalization: Contrast-gain control in simple (Fourier) and complex (non-Fourier) pathways of pattern vision, Vision Research 40, 2737-2761.
21. Graham, N. and Wolfson, S. S. (2001). A note about preferred orientations at the first and second stages of complex (second-order) texture channels, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A 18, 2273-2281.
22. Graham, N., Beck, J. and Sutter, A. (1992). Nonlinear processes in spatial-frequency channel models of perceived texlure segregation, Vision Research 32, 719-743.
23. Graham, N., Sutter, A. and Venkatesan, C. (1993). Spatial-frequency and orientation-selectivity of simple and complex channels in region segregation, Vision Research 33, 1893-1911.
24. Heeger, D. J. (1991). Computational model of cat striate physiology, in: Computational Models of Visual Processing, Landy, M. S. and Movshon, J. A. (Eds). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
25. Hood, D. C. and Graham, N. (1998). Threshold fluctuations on temporally modulated backgrounds: a possible physiological explanation based upon a recent computational model, Visual Neuroscience 15, 957-967.
26. Hood, D. C., Graham, N., von Wiegand, T. E. and Chase, V. M. (1997). Probed-sinewave paradigm: a test of models of light-adaptation dynamics, Vision Research 37, 1177-1191.
27. Kramer, P., Graham, N. and Yager, D. (1985). Simultaneous measurement of uncertainty and summation effects: Data and theory, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A 2, 1533-1542.
28. Landy, M. and Graham, N. (2003). Visual perception of texture, in: The Visual Neurosciences, Chalupa, L. M. and Werner, J. S. (Eds). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
29. Landy, M. S. and Oruc, I. (2002). Properties of second-order spatial frequency channels, Vision Research 42, 2311-2329.
30. Lennie, P. (1998). Single units and visual cortical organization, Perception 27, 889-935.
31. Lu, Z.-L., Liu, C. Q. and Dosher, B. A. (2000). Attention mechanisms for multiple-location first- and second-order motion perception, Vision Research 40, 173-186.
32. Oddo, S., Beck, J. and Mingolla, E. (1999). Texture segregation in chromatic element-arrangement patterns, Spatial Vision 12,421-459.
33. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies, Spatial Vision 10, 437-442.
34. Pessoa, L., Beck, J. and Mingolla, E. (1996). Perceived texture segregation in chromatic element-arrangement patterns: high intensity interference, Vision Research 36, 1745-1760.
35. Schofield, A. J. (2000). What does second-order vision see in an image? Perception 29, 1071-1086.
36. Schwartz, O. and Simoncelli, E. P. (2001). Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control, Nature Neuroscience 4, 819-825.
37. Simoncelli, E. P. and Olshausen, B. A. (2001). Natural image statistics and neural representation, Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 1193-1216.
38. Sperling, G. (1989). Three stages and two systems of visual processing, Spatial Vision 4, 183-207.
39. Sutter, A. and Graham, N. (1995). Investigating simple and complex mechanisms in texture segregation using the speed-accuracy tradeoff method, Vision Research 35, 2825-2843.
40. Sutter, A. and Hwang, D. (1999). A comparison of the dynamics of simple (Fourier) and complex (non-Fourier) mechanisms in texture segregation, Vision Research 39, 1943-1962.
41. Sutter, A., Beck, J. and Graham, N. (1989). Contrast and spatial variables in texture segregation: Testing a simple spatial-frequency channels model, Perception and Psychophysics 46, 312-332.
42. Sutter, A., Sperling, G. and Chubb, C. (1995). Measuring the spatial-frequency selectivity of second-order texture mechanisms, Vision Research 35, 915-924.
43. Victor, J. D., Conte, M. M. and Purpura, K. P. (1997). Dynamic shifts of the contrast-response function, Visual Neuroscience 14, 577-587.
44. Wilson, H. R. (1993). Nonlinear processes in visual pattern discrimination, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 9785-9790.
45. Wolfson, S. S. and Graham, N. (2000). Exploring the dynamics of light adaptation: the effects of varying the flickering background's duration in the probed-sinewave paradigm, Vision Research 40, 2277-2289.
46. Wolfson, S. S. and Graham, N. (2001a). Comparing increment and decrement probes in the probedsinewave paradigm, Vision Research 41, 1119-1131.
47. Wolfson, S. S. and Graham, N. (2001b). Processing in the probed-sinewave paradigm is likely retinal. Visual Neuroscience 18, 1003-1010.
48. Wolfson, S. S., Graham, N. and Slinin, O. (2004). Normalization and uncertainty effects in three objective tasks using first-order and second-order textures, Vision Sciences Society, abstract #E56, p. 134.