Optimizing frequency-to-electrode allocation in cochlear implants

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Volumn 15, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 574-584

  Leigh, Jaime R ^a,b   Henshall, Katherine R ^a   McKay, Colette M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b ROYAL VICTORIAN EYE AND EAR HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cochlear implants; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 16644403221     PISSN: 10500545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.15.8.5     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Boothroyd A, Hanin L, Hnath T. (1985) A Sentence Test of Speech Perception: Reliability, Set Equivalence, and Short Term Learning. New York: City University of New York.
2. Cochlear Ltd. (1994) Technical Reference Manual. Sydney: Cochlear Ltd.
3. Dowell RC, Martin LF, Tong YC, Clark GM, Seligman PM, Patrick JF. (1982) A 12-consonant confusion study on a multiple-channel cochlear implant patient. J Speech Hear Res 25:509-516.
4. Fishman KE, Shannon RV, Slattery WH. (1997) Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. J Speech Hear Res 40:1201-1215.
5. Fu QJ, Shannon RV. (1999a) Effects of electrode location and spacing on phoneme recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. Ear Hear 20:321-331.
6. Fu QJ, Shannon RV. (1999b) Effects of electrode configuration and frequency allocation on vowel recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. Ear Hear 20:332-344.
7. Fu QJ, Shannon RV, Galvin JJ, 3rd. (2002) Perceptual learning following changes in the frequency-to-electrode assignment with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 112:1664-1674.
8. Henry BA, McKay CM, McDermott HJ, Clark GM. (2000) The relationship between speech perception and electrode discrimination in cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am 108:1269-1280.
9. Henshall KR, McKay CM. (2001) Optimizing electrode and filter selection in cochlear implant speech processor maps. J Am Acad Audiol 12:478-489.
10. Levitt H. (1978) Adaptive testing in audiology. Scand Audiol Suppl 6:241-291.
11. McDermott HJ, Vandali AE, van Hoesel RJM, McKay CM, Harrison JM, Cohen LT. (1993) A portable programmable digital sound processor for cochlear implant research. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1:94-100.
12. McKay CM, Henshall KR. (2002) Frequency-to-electrode allocation and speech perception with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 111:1036-1044.
13. Miller GA, Nicely PE. (1955) An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J Acoust Soc Am 27:301-315.
14. Nelson DA, Van Tasell DJ, Schroder AC, Soli S, Levine S. (1995) Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 98:1987-1999.
15. Peterson G, Lehiste I. (1962) Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Disord 27:62-70.
16. Skinner MW, Clark GM, Whitford LA, Seligman PM, Staller SJ, Shipp DB, Shallop JK, Everingham C, Menapace CM, Arndt PL, Antogenelli T, Brimacombe JA, Pijl S, Daniels P, George CR, McDermott HJ, Beiter AL. (1994) Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System. Am J Otol 15(suppl. 2):15-27.
17. Skinner MW, Holden LK, Holden TA. (1995) Effect of frequency boundary assignment on speech recognition with the SPEAK speech-coding strategy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 104:307-311.
18. Skinner MW, Holden LK, Holden TA. (1997) Parameter selection to optimize speech recognition with the Nucleus implant. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:188-195.